Literature DB >> 30197843

Design and Integration of an Inexpensive Wearable Mechanotactile Feedback System for Myoelectric Prostheses.

Katherine R Schoepp1, Michael R Dawson1, Jonathon S Schofield2, Jason P Carey3, Jacqueline S Hebert1,4.   

Abstract

The aim of this paper was to demonstrate the functionality of an inexpensive mechanotactile sensory feedback system for transhumeral myoelectric prostheses. We summarize the development of a tactile-integrated prosthesis, including 1) evaluation of sensors that were retrofit onto existing commercial terminal devices; 2) design of two custom mechanotactile tactors that were integrated into a socket without compromising suction suspension; 3) design of a modular controller which translated sensor input to tactor output, was wirelessly adjusted, and fit within a prosthetic forearm; and 4) evaluation of the system with a single transhumeral participant. Prosthesis functionality was demonstrated over three test sessions; the participant was able to identify tactor stimulation location and demonstrated a reduction in grasp force with the mechanotactile stimulation. This system offers an inexpensive and modular solution for integration of a mechanotactile sensory feedback system into a prosthetic socket without compromising the suction seal. These principles can be applied in future studies to investigate the direct impact of sensory feedback on tangible outcomes for prosthetic users, thereby reducing barriers to clinical translation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medical robotics; force feedback; haptic interfaces; prosthetics

Year:  2018        PMID: 30197843      PMCID: PMC6126793          DOI: 10.1109/JTEHM.2018.2866105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med        ISSN: 2168-2372            Impact factor:   3.316


  39 in total

Review 1.  Extended physiologic taction: design and evaluation of a proportional force feedback system.

Authors:  S G Meek; S C Jacobsen; P P Goulding
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  1989

2.  Sensory feedback for powered limb prostheses.

Authors:  T A Rohland
Journal:  Med Biol Eng       Date:  1975-03

Review 3.  Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: a survey of the last 25 years.

Authors:  Elaine A Biddiss; Tom T Chau
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Design and evaluation of a sensory feedback system that provides grasping pressure in a myoelectric hand.

Authors:  P E Patterson; J A Katz
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  1992

5.  A novel concept for a prosthetic hand with a bidirectional interface: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Christian Cipriani; Christian Antfolk; Christian Balkenius; Birgitta Rosén; Goran Lundborg; Maria Chiara Carrozza; Fredrik Sebelius
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Transfer of tactile input from an artificial hand to the forearm: experiments in amputees and able-bodied volunteers.

Authors:  Christian Antfolk; Christian Cipriani; Maria Chiara Carrozza; Christian Balkenius; Anders Björkman; Göran Lundborg; Birgitta Rosén; Fredrik Sebelius
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol       Date:  2012-08-28

7.  A myoelectrically-controlled prosthesis with sensory feedback.

Authors:  G F Shannon
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Sensory feedback prosthesis reduces phantom limb pain: proof of a principle.

Authors:  Caroline Dietrich; Katrin Walter-Walsh; Sandra Preissler; Gunther O Hofmann; Otto W Witte; Wolfgang H R Miltner; Thomas Weiss
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  Investigation of rotational skin stretch for proprioceptive feedback with application to myoelectric systems.

Authors:  Jason Wheeler; Karlin Bark; Joan Savall; Mark Cutkosky
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 3.802

10.  The clinical relevance of advanced artificial feedback in the control of a multi-functional myoelectric prosthesis.

Authors:  Marko Markovic; Meike A Schweisfurth; Leonard F Engels; Tashina Bentz; Daniela Wüstefeld; Dario Farina; Strahinja Dosen
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 4.262

View more
  5 in total

1.  Preliminary Evaluation of the Effect of Mechanotactile Feedback Location on Myoelectric Prosthesis Performance Using a Sensorized Prosthetic Hand.

Authors:  Eric D Wells; Ahmed W Shehata; Michael R Dawson; Jason P Carey; Jacqueline S Hebert
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Online Closed-Loop Control Using Tactile Feedback Delivered Through Surface and Subdermal Electrotactile Stimulation.

Authors:  Jian Dong; Winnie Jensen; Bo Geng; Ernest Nlandu Kamavuako; Strahinja Dosen
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 4.677

3.  A Haptic Sleeve as a Method of Mechanotactile Feedback Restoration for Myoelectric Hand Prosthesis Users.

Authors:  Violet R Borkowska; Alistair McConnell; Sethu Vijayakumar; Adam Stokes; Aidan D Roche
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2022-04-25

4.  Sensory Feedback in Hand Prostheses: A Prospective Study of Everyday Use.

Authors:  Ulrika Wijk; Ingela K Carlsson; Christian Antfolk; Anders Björkman; Birgitta Rosén
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Psychometric characterization of incidental feedback sources during grasping with a hand prosthesis.

Authors:  Meike Annika Wilke; Christian Niethammer; Britta Meyer; Dario Farina; Strahinja Dosen
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 4.262

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.