Literature DB >> 18089785

Integrated profiling of basal and luminal breast cancers.

José Adélaïde1, Pascal Finetti, Ismahane Bekhouche, Laetitia Repellini, Jeannine Geneix, Fabrice Sircoulomb, Emmanuelle Charafe-Jauffret, Nathalie Cervera, Jérôme Desplans, Daniel Parzy, Eric Schoenmakers, Patrice Viens, Jocelyne Jacquemier, Daniel Birnbaum, François Bertucci, Max Chaffanet.   

Abstract

Basal and luminal are two molecular subtypes of breast cancer with opposite histoclinical features. We report a combined, high-resolution analysis of genome copy number and gene expression in primary basal and luminal breast cancers. First, we identified and compared genomic alterations in 45 basal and 48 luminal tumors by using 244K oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). We found various genome gains and losses and rare high-level gene amplifications that may provide therapeutic targets. We show that gain of 10p is a new alteration in basal breast cancer and that a subregion of the 8p12 amplification is specific of luminal tumors. Rare high-level amplifications contained BCL2L2, CCNE, EGFR, FGFR2, IGF1R, NOTCH2, and PIK3CA. Potential gene breaks involved ETV6 and FLT3. Second, we analyzed both aCGH and gene expression profiles for 42 basal and 32 luminal breast cancers. The results support the existence of specific oncogenic pathways in basal and luminal breast cancers, involving several potential oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes (TSG). In basal tumors, 73 candidate oncogenes were identified in chromosome regions 1q21-23, 10p14, and 12p13 and 28 candidate TSG in regions 4q32-34 and 5q11-23. In luminal breast cancers, 33 potential oncogenes were identified in 1q21-23, 8p12-q21, 11q13, and 16p12-13 and 61 candidate TSG in 16q12-13, 16q22-24, and 17p13. HORMAD1 (P = 6.5 x 10(-5)) and ZNF703 (P = 7 x 10(-4)) were the most significant basal and luminal potential oncogenes, respectively. Finally, among 10p candidate oncogenes associated with basal subtype, we validated CDC123/C10orf7 protein as a basal marker.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18089785     DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2536

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  135 in total

Review 1.  Histological types of breast cancer: how special are they?

Authors:  Britta Weigelt; Felipe C Geyer; Jorge S Reis-Filho
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2010-04-18       Impact factor: 6.603

2.  Identifying functional miRNA-mRNA regulatory modules with correspondence latent dirichlet allocation.

Authors:  Bing Liu; Lin Liu; Anna Tsykin; Gregory J Goodall; Jeffrey E Green; Min Zhu; Chang Hee Kim; Jiuyong Li
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-10-17       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 3.  Biological significance of HORMA domain containing protein 1 (HORMAD1) in epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Mian M K Shahzad; Yong-Hyun Shin; Koji Matsuo; Chunhua Lu; Masato Nishimura; De-Yo Shen; Yu Kang; Wei Hu; Edna M Mora; Cristian Rodriguez-Aguayo; Arvinder Kapur; Justin Bottsford-Miller; Gabriel Lopez-Berestein; Aleksandar Rajkovic; Anil K Sood
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 8.679

4.  Fibroblast growth factor receptor signaling dramatically accelerates tumorigenesis and enhances oncoprotein translation in the mouse mammary tumor virus-Wnt-1 mouse model of breast cancer.

Authors:  Adam C Pond; Jason I Herschkowitz; Kathryn L Schwertfeger; Bryan Welm; Yiqun Zhang; Brian York; Robert D Cardiff; Susan Hilsenbeck; Charles M Perou; Chad J Creighton; Richard E Lloyd; Jeffrey M Rosen
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  The VEGF receptor neuropilin 2 promotes homologous recombination by stimulating YAP/TAZ-mediated Rad51 expression.

Authors:  Ameer L Elaimy; John J Amante; Lihua Julie Zhu; Mengdie Wang; Charlotte S Walmsley; Thomas J FitzGerald; Hira Lal Goel; Arthur M Mercurio
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Triple-negative breast cancer: disease entity or title of convenience?

Authors:  Lisa Carey; Eric Winer; Giuseppe Viale; David Cameron; Luca Gianni
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 66.675

7.  Inferring tumor progression from genomic heterogeneity.

Authors:  Nicholas Navin; Alexander Krasnitz; Linda Rodgers; Kerry Cook; Jennifer Meth; Jude Kendall; Michael Riggs; Yvonne Eberling; Jennifer Troge; Vladimir Grubor; Dan Levy; Pär Lundin; Susanne Månér; Anders Zetterberg; James Hicks; Michael Wigler
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 8.  Genomic analyses as a guide to target identification and preclinical testing of mouse models of breast cancer.

Authors:  Christina N Bennett; Jeffrey E Green
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 1.902

9.  Phosphatase and tensin homologue deleted on chromosome 10 deficiency accelerates tumor induction in a mouse model of ErbB-2 mammary tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Nathalie Dourdin; Babette Schade; Robert Lesurf; Michael Hallett; Robert J Munn; Robert D Cardiff; William J Muller
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Chromosomal changes in aggressive breast cancers with basal-like features.

Authors:  Wayne Yu; Yasmine Kanaan; Young Kyung Bae; Young-Kyung Baed; Edward Gabrielson
Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet       Date:  2009-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.