Literature DB >> 20080934

Genomic analyses as a guide to target identification and preclinical testing of mouse models of breast cancer.

Christina N Bennett1, Jeffrey E Green.   

Abstract

Cross-species genomic analyses have proven useful for identifying common genomic alterations that occur in human cancers and mouse models designed to recapitulate human tumor development. High-throughput molecular analyses provide a valuable tool for identifying particular animal models that may represent aspects of specific subtypes of human cancers. Corresponding alterations in gene copy number and expression in tumors from mouse and human suggest that these conserved changes may be mechanistically essential for cancer development and progression, and therefore, they may be critical targets for therapeutic intervention. Using a cross-species analysis approach, mouse models in which the functions of p53, Rb, and BRCA1 have been disrupted demonstrate molecular features of human, triple-negative (ER-, PR-, and ERBB2-), basal-type breast cancer. Using mouse tumor models based on the targeted abrogation of p53 and Rb function, we identified a large, integrated genetic network that correlates to poor outcome in several human epithelial cancers. This gene signature is highly enriched for genes involved in DNA replication and repair, chromosome maintenance, cell cycle regulation, and apoptosis. Current studies are determining whether inactivation of specific members within this signature, using drugs or siRNA, will identify potentially important new targets to inhibit triple-negative, basal-type breast cancer for which no targeted therapies currently exist.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20080934      PMCID: PMC3483042          DOI: 10.1177/0192623309357074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Pathol        ISSN: 0192-6233            Impact factor:   1.902


  46 in total

1.  Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer.

Authors:  Laura J van 't Veer; Hongyue Dai; Marc J van de Vijver; Yudong D He; Augustinus A M Hart; Mao Mao; Hans L Peterse; Karin van der Kooy; Matthew J Marton; Anke T Witteveen; George J Schreiber; Ron M Kerkhoven; Chris Roberts; Peter S Linsley; René Bernards; Stephen H Friend
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Syngeneic mouse mammary carcinoma cell lines: two closely related cell lines with divergent metastatic behavior.

Authors:  Alexander D Borowsky; Ruria Namba; Lawrence J T Young; Kent W Hunter; J Graeme Hodgson; Clifford G Tepper; Erik T McGoldrick; William J Muller; Robert D Cardiff; Jeffrey P Gregg
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.150

3.  Haploid loss of Ki-ras delays mammary tumor progression in C3 (1)/SV40 Tag transgenic mice.

Authors:  M L Liu; M A Shibata; F C Von Lintig; W Wang; S Cassenaer; G R Boss; J E Green
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2001-04-12       Impact factor: 9.867

4.  A recurring pattern of chromosomal aberrations in mammary gland tumors of MMTV-cmyc transgenic mice.

Authors:  Z A Weaver; S J McCormack; M Liyanage; S du Manoir; A Coleman; E Schröck; R B Dickson; T Ried
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 5.006

5.  Multiple genetic changes are associated with mammary tumorigenesis in Brca1 conditional knockout mice.

Authors:  S G Brodie; X Xu; W Qiao; W M Li; L Cao; C X Deng
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2001-11-08       Impact factor: 9.867

6.  Mammary tumors in mice conditionally mutant for Brca1 exhibit gross genomic instability and centrosome amplification yet display a recurring distribution of genomic imbalances that is similar to human breast cancer.

Authors:  Zoë Weaver; Cristina Montagna; Xiaoling Xu; Tamara Howard; Massimo Gadina; Steven G Brodie; Chu-Xia Deng; Thomas Ried
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 9.867

7.  The Septin 9 (MSF) gene is amplified and overexpressed in mouse mammary gland adenocarcinomas and human breast cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Cristina Montagna; Myung-Soo Lyu; Kent Hunter; Luanne Lukes; William Lowther; Tricia Reppert; Bruce Hissong; Zoë Weaver; Thomas Ried
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer.

Authors:  Marc J van de Vijver; Yudong D He; Laura J van't Veer; Hongyue Dai; Augustinus A M Hart; Dorien W Voskuil; George J Schreiber; Johannes L Peterse; Chris Roberts; Matthew J Marton; Mark Parrish; Douwe Atsma; Anke Witteveen; Annuska Glas; Leonie Delahaye; Tony van der Velde; Harry Bartelink; Sjoerd Rodenhuis; Emiel T Rutgers; Stephen H Friend; René Bernards
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-12-19       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Conditional mutation of Brca1 in mammary epithelial cells results in blunted ductal morphogenesis and tumour formation.

Authors:  X Xu; K U Wagner; D Larson; Z Weaver; C Li; T Ried; L Hennighausen; A Wynshaw-Boris; C X Deng
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  The functional loss of the retinoblastoma tumour suppressor is a common event in basal-like and luminal B breast carcinomas.

Authors:  Jason I Herschkowitz; Xiaping He; Cheng Fan; Charles M Perou
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  7 in total

1.  Loss of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 expression delays mammary tumorigenesis and reduces localized inflammation in the C3(1)/SV40Tag triple negative breast cancer model.

Authors:  Taryn L Cranford; Kandy T Velázquez; Reilly T Enos; Jackie E Bader; Meredith S Carson; Ioulia Chatzistamou; Mitzi Nagarkatti; E Angela Murphy
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 4.742

2.  Benefits of exercise training on breast cancer progression and inflammation in C3(1)SV40Tag mice.

Authors:  E A Murphy; J M Davis; T L Barrilleaux; J L McClellan; J L Steiner; M D Carmichael; M M Pena; J R Hebert; J E Green
Journal:  Cytokine       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 3.861

3.  Presence of insulin-like growth factor binding proteins correlates with tumor-promoting effects of matrix metalloproteinase 9 in breast cancer.

Authors:  Jae-Hyun Park; Morten Grønbech Rasch; Jing Qiu; Ida Katrine Lund; Mikala Egeblad
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 5.715

4.  Genome-wide screen for differentially methylated long noncoding RNAs identifies Esrp2 and lncRNA Esrp2-as regulated by enhancer DNA methylation with prognostic relevance for human breast cancer.

Authors:  K Heilmann; R Toth; C Bossmann; K Klimo; C Plass; C Gerhauser
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 9.867

5.  Comparative study and meta-analysis of meta-analysis studies for the correlation of genomic markers with early cancer detection.

Authors:  Zoi Lanara; Efstathia Giannopoulou; Marta Fullen; Evangelos Kostantinopoulos; Jean-Christophe Nebel; Haralabos P Kalofonos; George P Patrinos; Cristiana Pavlidis
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 4.639

6.  Age-specific gene expression signatures for breast tumors and cross-species conserved potential cancer progression markers in young women.

Authors:  Dilek Colak; Asmaa Nofal; Albandary Albakheet; Maimoona Nirmal; Hatim Jeprel; Abdelmoneim Eldali; Taher Al-Tweigeri; Asma Tulbah; Dahish Ajarim; Osama Al Malik; Mehmet S Inan; Namik Kaya; Ben H Park; Suad M Bin Amer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Profiling the tyrosine phosphoproteome of different mouse mammary tumour models reveals distinct, model-specific signalling networks and conserved oncogenic pathways.

Authors:  Naveid A Ali; Jianmin Wu; Falko Hochgräfe; Howard Chan; Radhika Nair; Sunny Ye; Luxi Zhang; Ruth J Lyons; Mark Pinese; Hong Ching Lee; Nicola Armstrong; Christopher J Ormandy; Susan J Clark; Alexander Swarbrick; Roger J Daly
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 6.466

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.