Literature DB >> 18086139

Flexural strength, elastic modulus, and pH profile of self-etch resin luting cements.

Egle Saskalauskaite1, Laura E Tam, Dorothy McComb.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the flexural strength, modulus of elasticity, and 24-hour pH profile of three self-etching resin luting cements and to obtain comparative data for representative conventional resin and resin-modified glass ionomer luting cements.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three self-etching resin luting cements [RelyX Unicem (3M ESPE), Maxcem (Kerr), Embrace Wetbond (Pulpdent)] were tested and compared with two conventional resin cements [RelyX ARC (3M ESPE), Linkmax (GC)] plus two resin-modified glass ionomer luting cements [Fuji Plus (GC), RelyX Luting Plus (3M ESPE)]. Flexural strength and modulus of elasticity were determined using bar-shaped specimens (2 x 2 x 25 mm(3)) at 24 hours, using an Instron universal testing machine. Setting pH was measured using a flat-surface pH electrode at 0, 2, 5, 15, and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours after mixing. Testing was performed under both dual-cured and self-cured conditions for all dual-cure cements. Data analysis included ANOVA and Tukey's test (p < 0.05).
RESULTS: The self-etching cements showed similar flexural strength to the conventional resin cements, except for Embrace Wetbond self-cured, which was considerably lower. Modulus of elasticity results were both higher and lower than for conventional resin cements. All photopolymerized conventional and self-etch dual-cure cements showed markedly higher flexural strength and modulus than when solely self-cured. The resin-modified glass ionomer cements were characterized by lower flexural strength and elastic modulus. Self-etching resin cements showed lower initial pH (2.0 to 2.4) than conventional resin cements (4.8 to 5.2) and a wide range of final pH values (3.9 to 7.3) at 24 hours. One self-etching cement (Unicem) revealed a unique pH profile characterized by a more rapid rise in pH to neutrality both when dual-cured (15 minutes) and when auto-cured (1 hour).
CONCLUSIONS: The self-etching resin cements evaluated in this study displayed disparate properties and cannot be considered a homogeneous group. Flexural strength properties were most uniform and were similar to those of the conventional resin cements, whereas moduli of elasticity showed greater variation. Setting pH profiles differed, depending on the brand and mode of cure, even within the same category of luting cement. All cements with dual-cure capability, both conventional and self-etch, showed significantly superior properties when photopolymerized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18086139     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00278.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthodont        ISSN: 1059-941X            Impact factor:   2.752


  23 in total

1.  Four-year clinical evaluation of a self-adhesive luting agent for ceramic inlays.

Authors:  Marleen Peumans; M Voet; J De Munck; K Van Landuyt; A Van Ende; B Van Meerbeek
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-06-17       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to different treated indirect composites.

Authors:  M Victoria Fuentes; Laura Ceballos; Santiago González-López
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Immediate bonding effectiveness of contemporary composite cements to dentin.

Authors:  Mouhamed Sarr; Atsushi Mine; Jan De Munck; Marcio Vivan Cardoso; Abdoul Wakhabe Kane; José Vreven; Bart Van Meerbeek; Kirsten L Van Landuyt
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Effect of thermal cycling on the bond strength of self-adhesive cements to fiber posts.

Authors:  Claudia Mazzitelli; Francesca Monticelli; Manuel Toledano; Marco Ferrari; Raquel Osorio
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Effect of selective enamel etching on clinical performance of CAD/CAM partial ceramic crowns luted with a self-adhesive resin cement.

Authors:  Marianne Federlin; Karl-Anton Hiller; Gottfried Schmalz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Self-adhesive resin cements: pH-neutralization, hydrophilicity, and hygroscopic expansion stress.

Authors:  Lena Roedel; Vera Bednarzig; Renan Belli; Anselm Petschelt; Ulrich Lohbauer; José Zorzin
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Damage of lithium-disilicate all-ceramic restorations by an experimental self-adhesive resin cement used as core build-ups.

Authors:  G Sterzenbach; G Karajouli; R Tunjan; T Spintig; K Bitter; M Naumann
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Effect of Surface Treatment and Cement on Fracture Load of Traditional Zirconia (3Y), Translucent Zirconia (5Y), and Lithium Disilicate Crowns.

Authors:  Nathaniel C Lawson; Carlos A Jurado; Chan-Te Huang; Geoffrey P Morris; John O Burgess; Perng-Ru Liu; Keith E Kinderknecht; Chee Paul Lin; Daniel A Givan
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  Physical, Mechanical, and Adhesive Properties of Novel Self-Adhesive Resin Cement.

Authors:  Long Ling; Yumeng Ma; Yulin Chen; Raj Malyala
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2022-04-08

10.  Influence of immediate dentin sealing on the shear bond strength of pressed ceramic luted to dentin with self-etch resin cement.

Authors:  Robert Dalby; Ayman Ellakwa; Brian Millar; F Elizabeth Martin
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2012-01-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.