Literature DB >> 18085950

Developmental dissociations of preparation over time: deconstructing the variable foreperiod phenomena.

Antonino Vallesi1, Tim Shallice.   

Abstract

In a variable foreperiod (FP) paradigm, reaction times (RTs) decrease as a function of FP on trial n (FP effect) but increase with FP on trial n - 1 (sequential effects). These phenomena have traditionally been ascribed to different strategic preparation processes. According to an alternative explanation, common conditioning laws underlie both effects. The present study aims to disentangle these opposite views using a developmental perspective. In Experiment 1A, 4- to 11-year-old children and a control group of adults performed a simple RT task with variable FPs (1, 3, and 5 s). Furthermore, 12 4- to 5-year-old children were retested after 14 months (Experiment 1B). In Experiment 2, a narrower pool of participants (4, 5, and 6 years old) performed a variable FP paradigm with different FPs (1, 2, and 3 s). The results consistently suggest different ontogenetic time courses for the two effects: The sequential effects are already present in the youngest group (4-5 years old), whereas the FP effect appears gradually some years later. These findings are not fully compatible with previous views. A dual-process account is proposed to explain the data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18085950     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.6.1377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  34 in total

1.  Task predictability influences the variable foreperiod effect: evidence of task-specific temporal preparation.

Authors:  Hannes Schröter; Teresa Birngruber; Daniel Bratzke; Jeff Miller; Rolf Ulrich
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-03

2.  Control of oculomotor reflexes: independent effects of strategic and automatic preparation.

Authors:  Martijn Gerbrand Van Koningsbruggen; Robert D Rafal
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Pupillometric and behavioral markers of a developmental shift in the temporal dynamics of cognitive control.

Authors:  Christopher H Chatham; Michael J Frank; Yuko Munakata
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Neural substrates of mounting temporal expectation.

Authors:  Jennifer T Coull
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 8.029

5.  Increased Automaticity and Altered Temporal Preparation Following Sleep Deprivation.

Authors:  Danyang Kong; Christopher L Asplund; Aiqing Ling; Michael W L Chee
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 5.849

6.  Timing a week later: The role of long-term memory in temporal preparation.

Authors:  Rozemarijn M Mattiesing; Wouter Kruijne; Martijn Meeter; Sander A Los
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-12

7.  The expected oddball: effects of implicit and explicit positional expectation on duration perception.

Authors:  Jordan J Wehrman; John Wearden; Paul Sowman
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-09-12

8.  Gating of attentional effort through the central thalamus.

Authors:  N D Schiff; S A Shah; A E Hudson; T Nauvel; S F Kalik; K P Purpura
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Right-lateralized intrinsic brain dynamics predict monitoring abilities.

Authors:  Ettore Ambrosini; Mariagrazia Capizzi; Sandra Arbula; Antonino Vallesi
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  Contribution of reactive and proactive control to children's working memory performance: Insight from item recall durations in response sequence planning.

Authors:  Nicolas Chevalier; Tiffany D James; Sandra A Wiebe; Jennifer Mize Nelson; Kimberly Andrews Espy
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2014-04-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.