Literature DB >> 25845689

Increased Automaticity and Altered Temporal Preparation Following Sleep Deprivation.

Danyang Kong1, Christopher L Asplund1,2, Aiqing Ling1, Michael W L Chee1.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: Temporal expectation enables us to focus limited processing resources, thereby optimizing perceptual and motor processing for critical upcoming events. We investigated the effects of total sleep deprivation (TSD) on temporal expectation by evaluating the foreperiod and sequential effects during a psychomotor vigilance task (PVT). We also examined how these two measures were modulated by vulnerability to TSD.
DESIGN: Three 10-min visual PVT sessions using uniformly distributed foreperiods were conducted in the wake-maintenance zone the evening before sleep deprivation (ESD) and three more in the morning following approximately 22 h of TSD. TSD vulnerable and nonvulnerable groups were determined by a tertile split of participants based on the change in the number of behavioral lapses recorded during ESD and TSD. A subset of participants performed six additional 10-min modified auditory PVTs with exponentially distributed foreperiods during rested wakefulness (RW) and TSD to test the effect of temporal distribution on foreperiod and sequential effects.
SETTING: Sleep laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: There were 172 young healthy participants (90 males) with regular sleep patterns. Nineteen of these participants performed the modified auditory PVT. MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS: Despite behavioral lapses and slower response times, sleep deprived participants could still perceive the conditional probability of temporal events and modify their level of preparation accordingly. Both foreperiod and sequential effects were magnified following sleep deprivation in vulnerable individuals. Only the foreperiod effect increased in nonvulnerable individuals.
CONCLUSIONS: The preservation of foreperiod and sequential effects suggests that implicit time perception and temporal preparedness are intact during total sleep deprivation. Individuals appear to reallocate their depleted preparatory resources to more probable event timings in ongoing trials, whereas vulnerable participants also rely more on automatic processes.
© 2015 Associated Professional Sleep Societies, LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  foreperiod; implicit timing; sequential effect; sleep deprivation; temporal expectation; vulnerability

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25845689      PMCID: PMC4507727          DOI: 10.5665/sleep.4896

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sleep        ISSN: 0161-8105            Impact factor:   5.849


  48 in total

1.  Reduced visual processing capacity in sleep deprived persons.

Authors:  Danyang Kong; Chun Siong Soon; Michael W L Chee
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Time-on-task and sleep deprivation effects are evidenced in overlapping brain areas.

Authors:  Christopher L Asplund; Michael W L Chee
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Functional dissociations in temporal preparation: evidence from dual-task performance.

Authors:  Antonino Vallesi; Sandra Arbula; Paolo Bernardis
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2013-11-26

4.  Dissociating temporal preparation processes as a function of the inter-trial interval duration.

Authors:  Antonino Vallesi; Violeta N Lozano; Angel Correa
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2013-01-12

5.  Prefrontal neuropsychological effects of sleep deprivation in young adults--a model for healthy aging?

Authors:  Y Harrison; J A Horne; A Rothwell
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 5.849

Review 6.  The cognitive neuroscience of sustained attention: where top-down meets bottom-up.

Authors:  M Sarter; B Givens; J P Bruno
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  2001-04

7.  Sleep deprivation reduces the rate of rapid picture processing.

Authors:  Danyang Kong; Christopher L Asplund; Michael W L Chee
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-01-25       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Now you hear me, now you don't: eyelid closures as an indicator of auditory task disengagement.

Authors:  Ju Lynn Ong; Christopher L Asplund; Tiffany T Y Chia; Michael W L Chee
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 5.849

9.  Effects of partial and acute total sleep deprivation on performance across cognitive domains, individuals and circadian phase.

Authors:  June C Lo; John A Groeger; Nayantara Santhi; Emma L Arbon; Alpar S Lazar; Sibah Hasan; Malcolm von Schantz; Simon N Archer; Derk-Jan Dijk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Endogenous modulation of low frequency oscillations by temporal expectations.

Authors:  Andre M Cravo; Gustavo Rohenkohl; Valentin Wyart; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  6 in total

1.  Raw scores on subjective sleepiness, fatigue, and vigor metrics consistently define resilience and vulnerability to sleep loss.

Authors:  Courtney E Casale; Erika M Yamazaki; Tess E Brieva; Caroline A Antler; Namni Goel
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 6.313

2.  Concordance of multiple methods to define resiliency and vulnerability to sleep loss depends on Psychomotor Vigilance Test metric.

Authors:  Erika M Yamazaki; Courtney E Casale; Tess E Brieva; Caroline A Antler; Namni Goel
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 6.313

3.  Pupillary fluctuation amplitude preceding target presentation is linked to the variable foreperiod effect on reaction time in Psychomotor Vigilance Tasks.

Authors:  Jumpei Yamashita; Hiroki Terashima; Makoto Yoneya; Kazushi Maruya; Haruo Oishi; Takatsune Kumada
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Cognitive throughput and working memory raw scores consistently differentiate resilient and vulnerable groups to sleep loss.

Authors:  Tess E Brieva; Courtney E Casale; Erika M Yamazaki; Caroline A Antler; Namni Goel
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 6.313

5.  Left Ventricular Ejection Time Measured by Echocardiography Differentiates Neurobehavioral Resilience and Vulnerability to Sleep Loss and Stress.

Authors:  Erika M Yamazaki; Kathleen M Rosendahl-Garcia; Courtney E Casale; Laura E MacMullen; Adrian J Ecker; James N Kirkpatrick; Namni Goel
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 6.  Genetic Markers of Differential Vulnerability to Sleep Loss in Adults.

Authors:  Courtney E Casale; Namni Goel
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 4.096

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.