Literature DB >> 18085948

Trade-offs between gaze and working memory use.

Jason A Droll1, Mary M Hayhoe.   

Abstract

Eye movements during natural tasks suggest that observers do not use working memory to capacity but instead use eye movements to acquire relevant information immediately before needed. Results here however, show that this strategy is sensitive to memory load and to observers' expectations about what information will be relevant. Depending upon the predictability of what object features would be needed in a brick sorting task, subjects spontaneously modulated the order in which they sampled and stored visual information using working memory more when the task was predictable and reverting to a just-in-time strategy when the task was unpredictable and the memory load was higher. This self organization was evidenced by subjects' sequence of eye movements and also their sorting decisions following missed feature changes. These results reveal that attentional selection, fixations, and use of working memory reflect a dynamic optimization with respect to a set of constraints, such as task predictablity and memory load. They also reveal that change blindness depends critically on the local task context, by virtue of its influence on the information selected for storage in working memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18085948     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.6.1352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  36 in total

1.  Eye-response lags during a continuous monitoring task.

Authors:  Christina J Howard; Tom Troscianko; Iain D Gilchrist
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-10

2.  Priorities for selection and representation in natural tasks.

Authors:  Benjamin W Tatler; Yoriko Hirose; Sarah K Finnegan; Riina Pievilainen; Clare Kirtley; Alan Kennedy
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Vision and the representation of the surroundings in spatial memory.

Authors:  Benjamin W Tatler; Michael F Land
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Do object refixations during scene viewing indicate rehearsal in visual working memory?

Authors:  Gregory J Zelinsky; Lester C Loschky; Christopher A Dickinson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-05

5.  Does task sustainability provide a unified measure of subjective task difficulty?

Authors:  David A Rosenbaum; Bill V Bui
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-12

6.  The function of regressions in reading: backward eye movements allow rereading.

Authors:  Robert W Booth; Ulrich W Weger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-01

7.  Prefrontal cortex, cognitive control, and the registration of decision costs.

Authors:  Joseph T McGuire; Matthew M Botvinick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Looking Behavior and Audiovisual Speech Understanding in Children With Normal Hearing and Children With Mild Bilateral or Unilateral Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Dawna E Lewis; Nicholas A Smith; Jody L Spalding; Daniel L Valente
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Recentering bias for temporal saccades only: Evidence from binocular recordings of eye movements.

Authors:  Jérôme Tagu; Karine Doré-Mazars; Judith Vergne; Christelle Lemoine-Lardennois; Dorine Vergilino-Perez
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  The strategic retention of task-relevant objects in visual working memory.

Authors:  Ashleigh M Maxcey-Richard; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.