Literature DB >> 9616472

The effect of inducer polarity and contrast on the perception of illusory figures.

N Matthews1, L Welch.   

Abstract

A study designed to determine how inducer-surround contrast and inducer polarity affect the contour clarity and the lightness of illusory figures is reported. Using magnitude estimation procedures, ten naive subjects rated both the contour clarity and the lightness of Kanizsa squares. The magnitude of the inducer-surround contrast and the inducer polarity (all-black, all-white, or black-and-white) were varied randomly on each trial. The data indicate that contour clarity increases with contrast at the same rate across polarity conditions but that contour clarity at any given contrast level depends significantly on polarity. Contour clarity judgments were significantly lower when the inducers were all-white than when the inducers were all-black or black-and-white, and significantly greater in the 'mixed' polarity case (black-and-white inducers) than in the 'same' polarity case (the average of the all-black and all-white inducer conditions). Inducer contrast and polarity significantly affected the lightness of the illusory figure in a manner consistent with simultaneous spatial contrast. Also, for a given increment in contrast, contour clarity altered significantly more than surface lightness, regardless of inducer polarity. The findings suggest that the mechanism which mediates boundary formation is sensitive to the direction of contrast, and that the boundary formation mechanism is more sensitive than the surface lightness mechanism to changes in contrast magnitude. The results are considered within the context of neural network models of form perception.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9616472     DOI: 10.1068/p261431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  5 in total

1.  Inhibition of return and object-based attentional selection.

Authors:  Alexandra List; Lynn C Robertson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Nonsymbolic numerosity in sets with illusory-contours exploits a context-sensitive, but contrast-insensitive, visual boundary formation process.

Authors:  Andrea Adriano; Luca Rinaldi; Luisa Girelli
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-10-17       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  The experience of stereoblindness does not improve use of texture for slant perception.

Authors:  Pin Yang; Jeffrey A Saunders; Zhongting Chen
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 2.004

4.  Reinterpreting behavioral receptive fields: lightness induction alters visually completed shape.

Authors:  Brian P Keane; Hongjing Lu; Thomas V Papathomas; Steven M Silverstein; Philip J Kellman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Neural Computation of Surface Border Ownership and Relative Surface Depth from Ambiguous Contrast Inputs.

Authors:  Birgitta Dresp-Langley; Stephen Grossberg
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-07-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.