Literature DB >> 18083738

Jamming avoidance response of big brown bats in target detection.

Mary E Bates1, Sarah A Stamper, James A Simmons.   

Abstract

When searching for prey, big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) enhance the range of their sonar by concentrating more energy in the nearly constant-frequency (CF) tail portion of their frequency-modulated (FM) sweeps. We hypothesize that this portion of their signals may be vulnerable to interference from conspecifics using the same frequencies in their own emissions. To determine how bats modify their signals when confronted with an interfering stimulus, we compared the echolocation calls of bats when a CF jamming tone was on and off. The bats performed a two-alternative forced-choice detection task in the laboratory that required the use of echolocation. All three bats shifted the tail-end CF component of their emitted frequency bidirectionally away from the CF jamming stimulus only when the jamming frequency was within 2-3 kHz of the preferred baseline frequency of the bat. The duration of their emissions did not differ between the jamming and no-jamming trials. The jamming avoidance response of bats may serve to avoid masking or interference in a narrow range of frequencies important for target detection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18083738     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.009688

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  32 in total

1.  Convergence of reference frequencies by multiple CF-FM bats (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum nippon) during paired flights evaluated with onboard microphones.

Authors:  Yuto Furusawa; Shizuko Hiryu; Kohta I Kobayasi; Hiroshi Riquimaroux
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  FM echolocating bats shift frequencies to avoid broadcast-echo ambiguity in clutter.

Authors:  Shizuko Hiryu; Mary E Bates; James A Simmons; Hiroshi Riquimaroux
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Calling louder and longer: how bats use biosonar under severe acoustic interference from other bats.

Authors:  Eran Amichai; Gaddi Blumrosen; Yossi Yovel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  The predictability of evolution: glimpses into a post-Darwinian world.

Authors:  Simon Conway Morris
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2009-09-23

5.  On-board recordings reveal no jamming avoidance in wild bats.

Authors:  Noam Cvikel; Eran Levin; Edward Hurme; Ivailo Borissov; Arjan Boonman; Eran Amichai; Yossi Yovel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Adaptive vocal behavior drives perception by echolocation in bats.

Authors:  Cynthia F Moss; Chen Chiu; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 6.627

7.  Echolocating bats rely on audiovocal feedback to adapt sonar signal design.

Authors:  Jinhong Luo; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Modeling active sensing reveals echo detection even in large groups of bats.

Authors:  Thejasvi Beleyur; Holger R Goerlitz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  When echolocating bats do not echolocate.

Authors:  Chen Chiu; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2008

10.  Probing the natural scene by echolocation in bats.

Authors:  Cynthia F Moss; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.