BACKGROUND: To determine whether combined astigmatic keratotomy and cataract surgery induces a sustained reduction in astigmatism. METHODS: Patients who had previously undergone combined cataract surgery and astigmatic keratotomy for naturally occurring astigmatism were identified and their notes reviewed. Mean final follow-up was 34 months (30-42 months). Fourteen eyes of 11 patients were eligible for study. Arcuate corneal incisions had been employed using the Buzard nomogram. Using power vector analysis, the post-operative refractive change at 6 months and final follow-up was determined. RESULTS: The mean preoperative manifest cylindrical refractive error was 2.88 D (1.50-5.50 D). The mean postoperative manifest cylindrical refractive error was 1.89 and 1.79 D at 6 months and final follow-up, respectively. Power vector analysis demonstrated a significant postoperative reduction in refractive blur at 6 months and final follow-up (P = 0.006, P = 0.004, respectively): mean preoperative blur strength was 2.90 D and mean postoperative blur strength was 1.33 and 1.25 D at 6 months and final follow-up, respectively. Sustained postoperative reduction in astigmatism was noted in 12 of 14 eyes at final follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Astigmatic keratotomy is a well-established treatment for astigmatism. In this series, the refractive benefit from combined astigmatic keratotomy and cataract surgery is maintained for several years. No surgical complications were observed.
BACKGROUND: To determine whether combined astigmatic keratotomy and cataract surgery induces a sustained reduction in astigmatism. METHODS:Patients who had previously undergone combined cataract surgery and astigmatic keratotomy for naturally occurring astigmatism were identified and their notes reviewed. Mean final follow-up was 34 months (30-42 months). Fourteen eyes of 11 patients were eligible for study. Arcuate corneal incisions had been employed using the Buzard nomogram. Using power vector analysis, the post-operative refractive change at 6 months and final follow-up was determined. RESULTS: The mean preoperative manifest cylindrical refractive error was 2.88 D (1.50-5.50 D). The mean postoperative manifest cylindrical refractive error was 1.89 and 1.79 D at 6 months and final follow-up, respectively. Power vector analysis demonstrated a significant postoperative reduction in refractive blur at 6 months and final follow-up (P = 0.006, P = 0.004, respectively): mean preoperative blur strength was 2.90 D and mean postoperative blur strength was 1.33 and 1.25 D at 6 months and final follow-up, respectively. Sustained postoperative reduction in astigmatism was noted in 12 of 14 eyes at final follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Astigmatic keratotomy is a well-established treatment for astigmatism. In this series, the refractive benefit from combined astigmatic keratotomy and cataract surgery is maintained for several years. No surgical complications were observed.
Authors: Alessandro Meduri; Mario Urso; Giuseppe A Signorino; Miguel Rechichi; Cosimo Mazzotta; Stephen Kaufman Journal: Int J Ophthalmol Date: 2017-07-18 Impact factor: 1.779