Literature DB >> 18077667

Trial-by-trial updating of the gain in preparation for smooth pursuit eye movement based on past experience in humans.

Hiromitsu Tabata1, Kenichiro Miura, Kenji Kawano.   

Abstract

To understand how the CNS uses past experiences to generate movements that accommodate minute-by-minute environmental changes, we studied the trial-by-trial updating of the gain for initiating smooth pursuit eye movements and how this relates to the history of previous trials. Ocular responses in humans elicited by a small perturbing motion presented 300 ms after appearance of a target were used as a measure of the gain of visuomotor transmission. After the perturbation, the target was either moved horizontally (pursuit trial) or remained in a stationary position (fixation trial). The trial sequence randomly included pursuit and fixation. The amplitude of the response to the perturbation was modulated in a trial-by-trial manner based on the immediately preceding trial, with preceding fixation and pursuit trials decreasing and increasing the gain, respectively. The effect of the previous trial was larger with shorter intertrial intervals, but did not diminish for at least 2,000 ms. A time-series analysis showed that the response amplitude was significantly correlated with the past few trials, with dynamics that could be approximated by a first-order linear system. The results suggest that the CNS integrates recent experiences to set the gain in preparation for upcoming tracking movements in a changing environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18077667     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00714.2007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  10 in total

1.  Learning on multiple timescales in smooth pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  Yan Yang; Stephen G Lisberger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Neural activity in the frontal pursuit area does not underlie pursuit target selection.

Authors:  Shaun Mahaffy; Richard J Krauzlis
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Active linear head motion improves dynamic visual acuity in pursuing a high-speed moving object.

Authors:  Tatsuhisa Hasegawa; Masayuki Yamashita; Toshihiro Suzuki; Yasuo Hisa; Yoshiro Wada
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Adaptations of lateral hand movements to early and late visual occlusion in catching.

Authors:  Joost C Dessing; Leonie Oostwoud Wijdenes; C Lieke E Peper; Peter J Beek
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  A switching cost for motor planning.

Authors:  Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry; Philippe Lefèvre
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Predictive eye movements in natural vision.

Authors:  Mary M Hayhoe; Travis McKinney; Kelly Chajka; Jeff B Pelz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Short-term adaptations of the dynamic disparity vergence and phoria systems.

Authors:  Eun H Kim; Vincent R Vicci; Bérangère Granger-Donetti; Tara L Alvarez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  Visual guidance of smooth-pursuit eye movements: sensation, action, and what happens in between.

Authors:  Stephen G Lisberger
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 9.  Filling gaps in visual motion for target capture.

Authors:  Gianfranco Bosco; Sergio Delle Monache; Silvio Gravano; Iole Indovina; Barbara La Scaleia; Vincenzo Maffei; Myrka Zago; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-23

10.  The influence of stimulus and behavioral histories on predictive control of smooth pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  Takeshi Miyamoto; Yutaka Hirata; Akira Katoh; Kenichiro Miura; Seiji Ono
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.