Literature DB >> 20510853

Visual guidance of smooth-pursuit eye movements: sensation, action, and what happens in between.

Stephen G Lisberger1.   

Abstract

Smooth-pursuit eye movements transform 100 ms of visual motion into a rapid initiation of smooth eye movement followed by sustained accurate tracking. Both the mean and variation of the visually driven pursuit response can be accounted for by the combination of the mean tuning curves and the correlated noise within the sensory representation of visual motion in extrastriate visual area MT. Sensory-motor and motor circuits have both housekeeping and modulatory functions, implemented in the cerebellum and the smooth eye movement region of the frontal eye fields. The representation of pursuit is quite different in these two regions of the brain, but both regions seem to control pursuit directly with little or no noise added downstream. Finally, pursuit exhibits a number of voluntary characteristics that happen on short timescales. These features make pursuit an excellent exemplar for understanding the general properties of sensory-motor processing in the brain. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20510853      PMCID: PMC2887486          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuron        ISSN: 0896-6273            Impact factor:   17.173


  97 in total

1.  Regulation of the gain of visually guided smooth-pursuit eye movements by frontal cortex.

Authors:  M Tanaka; S G Lisberger
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-01-11       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Visual tracking and the primate flocculus.

Authors:  F A Miles; J H Fuller
Journal:  Science       Date:  1975-09-19       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Role of the dorsolateral pontine nucleus in short-term adaptation of the horizontal vestibuloocular reflex.

Authors:  Seiji Ono; Vallabh E Das; Michael J Mustari
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The sources of variability in saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Robert J van Beers
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Coding of intention in the posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  L H Snyder; A P Batista; R A Andersen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-03-13       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Visual responses of Purkinje cells in the cerebellar flocculus during smooth-pursuit eye movements in monkeys. I. Simple spikes.

Authors:  L S Stone; S G Lisberger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Activity of substantia nigra pars reticulata neurons during smooth pursuit eye movements in monkeys.

Authors:  Michele A Basso; Jennifer J Pokorny; Ping Liu
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.386

8.  Saccades are spatially, not retinocentrically, coded.

Authors:  L E Mays; D L Sparks
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-06-06       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Relation of cortical areas MT and MST to pursuit eye movements. III. Interaction with full-field visual stimulation.

Authors:  H Komatsu; R H Wurtz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Changes in the responses of Purkinje cells in the floccular complex of monkeys after motor learning in smooth pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  M Kahlon; S G Lisberger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  85 in total

Review 1.  Consensus paper: roles of the cerebellum in motor control--the diversity of ideas on cerebellar involvement in movement.

Authors:  Mario Manto; James M Bower; Adriana Bastos Conforto; José M Delgado-García; Suzete Nascimento Farias da Guarda; Marcus Gerwig; Christophe Habas; Nobuhiro Hagura; Richard B Ivry; Peter Mariën; Marco Molinari; Eiichi Naito; Dennis A Nowak; Nordeyn Oulad Ben Taib; Denis Pelisson; Claudia D Tesche; Caroline Tilikete; Dagmar Timmann
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Similar effects of feature-based attention on motion perception and pursuit eye movements at different levels of awareness.

Authors:  Miriam Spering; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Manual tracking enhances smooth pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  Diederick C Niehorster; Wilfred W F Siu; Li Li
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  A framework for using signal, noise, and variation to determine whether the brain controls movement synergies or single muscles.

Authors:  Mati Joshua; Stephen G Lisberger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Memory and prediction in natural gaze control.

Authors:  Gabriel Diaz; Joseph Cooper; Mary Hayhoe
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Diversity of vestibular nuclei neurons targeted by cerebellar nodulus inhibition.

Authors:  Hui Meng; Pablo M Blázquez; J David Dickman; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  A neurally efficient implementation of sensory population decoding.

Authors:  Kris S Chaisanguanthum; Stephen G Lisberger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Role of MSTd extraretinal signals in smooth pursuit adaptation.

Authors:  Seiji Ono; Michael J Mustari
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Sensory versus motor loci for integration of multiple motion signals in smooth pursuit eye movements and human motion perception.

Authors:  Yu-Qiong Niu; Stephen G Lisberger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 10.  Acting without seeing: eye movements reveal visual processing without awareness.

Authors:  Miriam Spering; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 13.837

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.