Literature DB >> 18077520

Cochlear implant benefits in deafness rehabilitation: PET study of temporal voice activations.

Arnaud Coez1, Monica Zilbovicius, Evelyne Ferrary, Didier Bouccara, Isabelle Mosnier, Emmanuèle Ambert-Dahan, Eric Bizaguet, André Syrota, Yves Samson, Olivier Sterkers.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Cochlear implants may improve the medical and social prognosis of profound deafness. Nevertheless, some patients have experienced poor results without any clear explanations. One correlate may be an alteration in cortical voice processing. To test this hypothesis, we studied the activation of human temporal voice areas (TVA) using a well-standardized PET paradigm adapted from previous functional MRI (fMRI) studies.
METHODS: A PET H(2)(15)O activation study was performed on 3 groups of adult volunteers: normal-hearing control subjects (n = 6) and cochlear-implanted postlingually deaf patients with >2 y of cochlear implant experience, with intelligibility scores in the "Lafon monosyllabic task" >80% (GOOD group; n = 6) or <20% (POOR group; n = 6). Relative cerebral blood flow was measured in 3 conditions: rest, passive listening to human voice, and nonvoice stimuli.
RESULTS: Compared with silence, the activations induced by nonvoice stimuli were bilaterally located in the superior temporal regions in all groups. However these activations were significantly and similarly reduced in both cochlear implant groups, whereas control subjects showed supplementary activations. Compared with nonvoice, the voice stimuli induced bilateral activation of the TVA along the superior temporal sulcus (STS) in both the control and the GOOD groups. In contrast, these activations were not detected in the POOR group, which showed only left unilateral middle STS activation.
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that PET is an adequate method to explore cochlear implant benefits and that this benefit could be linked to the activation of the TVA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18077520     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.107.044545

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  16 in total

1.  Auditory cortical activity during cochlear implant-mediated perception of spoken language, melody, and rhythm.

Authors:  Charles J Limb; Anne T Molloy; Patpong Jiradejvong; Allen R Braun
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-08-07

2.  The role of the salience network in processing lexical and nonlexical stimuli in cochlear implant users: an ALE meta-analysis of PET studies.

Authors:  Jae-Jin Song; Sven Vanneste; Diane S Lazard; Paul Van de Heyning; Joo Hyun Park; Seung Ha Oh; Dirk De Ridder
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  The renaissance of functional 18F-FDG PET brain activation imaging.

Authors:  Antoine Verger; Eric Guedj
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Voice Discrimination by Adults with Cochlear Implants: the Benefits of Early Implantation for Vocal-Tract Length Perception.

Authors:  Yael Zaltz; Raymond L Goldsworthy; Liat Kishon-Rabin; Laurie S Eisenberg
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-01-08

5.  Connectivity in Language Areas of the Brain in Cochlear Implant Users as Revealed by fNIRS.

Authors:  Colette M McKay; Adnan Shah; Abd-Krim Seghouane; Xin Zhou; William Cross; Ruth Litovsky
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

6.  Evolution of crossmodal reorganization of the voice area in cochlear-implanted deaf patients.

Authors:  Julien Rouger; Sébastien Lagleyre; Jean-François Démonet; Bernard Fraysse; Olivier Deguine; Pascal Barone
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Neuroimaging with near-infrared spectroscopy demonstrates speech-evoked activity in the auditory cortex of deaf children following cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Alexander B G Sevy; Heather Bortfeld; Theodore J Huppert; Michael S Beauchamp; Ross E Tonini; John S Oghalai
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 8.  Multisensory Integration in Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Ryan A Stevenson; Sterling W Sheffield; Iliza M Butera; René H Gifford; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Cortical reorganization in children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Phillip M Gilley; Anu Sharma; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-18       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Brain voice processing with bilateral cochlear implants: a positron emission tomography study.

Authors:  Arnaud Coez; Monica Zilbovicius; Evelyne Ferrary; Didier Bouccara; Isabelle Mosnier; Emmanuèle Ambert-Dahan; Eric Bizaguet; Jean-Luc Martinot; Yves Samson; Olivier Sterkers
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-11-23       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.