Literature DB >> 18074107

Effects of inductive bias on computational evaluations of ligand-based modeling and on drug discovery.

Ann E Cleves1, Ajay N Jain.   

Abstract

Inductive bias is the set of assumptions that a person or procedure makes in making a prediction based on data. Different methods for ligand-based predictive modeling have different inductive biases, with a particularly sharp contrast between 2D and 3D similarity methods. A unique aspect of ligand design is that the data that exist to test methodology have been largely man-made, and that this process of design involves prediction. By analyzing the molecular similarities of known drugs, we show that the inductive bias of the historic drug discovery process has a very strong 2D bias. In studying the performance of ligand-based modeling methods, it is critical to account for this issue in dataset preparation, use of computational controls, and in the interpretation of results. We propose specific strategies to explicitly address the problems posed by inductive bias considerations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18074107     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-007-9150-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  18 in total

1.  Protein-based virtual screening of chemical databases. 1. Evaluation of different docking/scoring combinations.

Authors:  C Bissantz; G Folkers; D Rognan
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2000-12-14       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  Ligand-based structural hypotheses for virtual screening.

Authors:  Ajay N Jain
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-02-12       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  ZINC--a free database of commercially available compounds for virtual screening.

Authors:  John J Irwin; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  Comparison of shape-matching and docking as virtual screening tools.

Authors:  Paul C D Hawkins; A Geoffrey Skillman; Anthony Nicholls
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 5.  Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors--drug design and differentiation based on selectivity, pharmacokinetic and efficacy profiles.

Authors:  Claudiu T Supuran; Antonio Mastrolorenzo; Giuseppe Barbaro; Andrea Scozzafava
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.116

Review 6.  Statin-induced rhabdomyolysis.

Authors:  Donald H Schreiber; Thomas R Anderson
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.484

Review 7.  Safety of high-dose atorvastatin therapy.

Authors:  David D Waters
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2005-09-05       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  A postmarketing study of relative abuse liability of hypnotic sedative drugs.

Authors:  Jerome H Jaffe; Roger Bloor; Ilana Crome; Malcolm Carr; Farrukh Alam; Arnol Simmons; Roger E Meyer
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.526

Review 9.  Vardenafil treatment for erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  Susan M Crowe; Daniel S Streetman
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  Surflex-Dock 2.1: robust performance from ligand energetic modeling, ring flexibility, and knowledge-based search.

Authors:  Ajay N Jain
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 4.179

View more
  21 in total

1.  Prediction of off-target drug effects through data fusion.

Authors:  Emmanuel R Yera; Ann E Cleves; Ajay N Jain
Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput       Date:  2014

2.  Chemical structural novelty: on-targets and off-targets.

Authors:  Emmanuel R Yera; Ann E Cleves; Ajay N Jain
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  A Simple Representation of Three-Dimensional Molecular Structure.

Authors:  Seth D Axen; Xi-Ping Huang; Elena L Cáceres; Leo Gendelev; Bryan L Roth; Michael J Keiser
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Comparative modeling and benchmarking data sets for human histone deacetylases and sirtuin families.

Authors:  Jie Xia; Ermias Lemma Tilahun; Eyob Hailu Kebede; Terry-Elinor Reid; Liangren Zhang; Xiang Simon Wang
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Does your model weigh the same as a duck?

Authors:  Ajay N Jain; Ann E Cleves
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Benchmarking methods and data sets for ligand enrichment assessment in virtual screening.

Authors:  Jie Xia; Ermias Lemma Tilahun; Terry-Elinor Reid; Liangren Zhang; Xiang Simon Wang
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.608

7.  Optimal assignment methods for ligand-based virtual screening.

Authors:  Andreas Jahn; Georg Hinselmann; Nikolas Fechner; Andreas Zell
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 5.514

8.  Molecular shape and medicinal chemistry: a perspective.

Authors:  Anthony Nicholls; Georgia B McGaughey; Robert P Sheridan; Andrew C Good; Gregory Warren; Magali Mathieu; Steven W Muchmore; Scott P Brown; J Andrew Grant; James A Haigh; Neysa Nevins; Ajay N Jain; Brian Kelley
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 7.446

9.  Physical binding pocket induction for affinity prediction.

Authors:  James J Langham; Ann E Cleves; Russell Spitzer; Daniel Kirshner; Ajay N Jain
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 7.446

10.  Computational analysis reveal inhibitory action of nimbin against dengue viral envelope protein.

Authors:  P Lavanya; Sudha Ramaiah; Anand Anbarasu
Journal:  Virusdisease       Date:  2015-11-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.