Literature DB >> 21916467

Chemical structural novelty: on-targets and off-targets.

Emmanuel R Yera1, Ann E Cleves, Ajay N Jain.   

Abstract

Drug structures may be quantitatively compared based on 2D topological structural considerations and based on 3D characteristics directly related to binding. A framework for combining multiple similarity computations is presented along with its systematic application to 358 drugs with overlapping pharmacology. Given a new molecule along with a set of molecules sharing some biological effect, a single score based on comparison to the known set is produced, reflecting either 2D similarity, 3D similarity, or their combination. For prediction of primary targets, the benefit of 3D over 2D was relatively small, but for prediction of off-targets, the added benefit was large. In addition to assessing prediction, the relationship between chemical similarity and pharmacological novelty was studied. Drug pairs that shared high 3D similarity but low 2D similarity (i.e., a novel scaffold) were shown to be much more likely to exhibit pharmacologically relevant differences in terms of specific protein target modulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21916467      PMCID: PMC3188662          DOI: 10.1021/jm200666a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Chem        ISSN: 0022-2623            Impact factor:   7.446


  38 in total

1.  Collecting and harvesting biological data: the GPCRDB and NucleaRDB information systems.

Authors:  F Horn; G Vriend; F E Cohen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Morphological similarity: a 3D molecular similarity method correlated with protein-ligand recognition.

Authors:  A N Jain
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  The Binding Database: data management and interface design.

Authors:  Xi Chen; Yuhmei Lin; Ming Liu; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Ligand-based structural hypotheses for virtual screening.

Authors:  Ajay N Jain
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-02-12       Impact factor: 7.446

5.  The first potent and selective non-imidazole human histamine H4 receptor antagonists.

Authors:  Jill A Jablonowski; Cheryl A Grice; Wenying Chai; Curt A Dvorak; Jennifer D Venable; Annette K Kwok; Kiev S Ly; Jianmei Wei; Sherry M Baker; Pragnya J Desai; Wen Jiang; Sandy J Wilson; Robin L Thurmond; Lars Karlsson; James P Edwards; Timothy W Lovenberg; Nicholas I Carruthers
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2003-09-11       Impact factor: 7.446

6.  Studies on muscarinic binding sites in human brain identified with [3H]pirenzepine.

Authors:  S C Lin; K C Olson; H Okazaki; E Richelson
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 5.372

7.  Molecular shape and medicinal chemistry: a perspective.

Authors:  Anthony Nicholls; Georgia B McGaughey; Robert P Sheridan; Andrew C Good; Gregory Warren; Magali Mathieu; Steven W Muchmore; Scott P Brown; J Andrew Grant; James A Haigh; Neysa Nevins; Ajay N Jain; Brian Kelley
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 7.446

8.  Mesoridazine: an open-channel blocker of human ether-a-go-go-related gene K+ channel.

Authors:  Zhi Su; Ruth Martin; Bryan F Cox; Gary Gintant
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.000

9.  Interaction of amoxapine with muscarinic cholinergic receptors: an in vitro assessment.

Authors:  J Coupet; S K Fisher; C E Rauh; F Lai; B Beer
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  1985-06-07       Impact factor: 4.432

10.  ChemProt: a disease chemical biology database.

Authors:  Olivier Taboureau; Sonny Kim Nielsen; Karine Audouze; Nils Weinhold; Daniel Edsgärd; Francisco S Roque; Irene Kouskoumvekaki; Alina Bora; Ramona Curpan; Thomas Skøt Jensen; Søren Brunak; Tudor I Oprea
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  25 in total

1.  Comparison of ultra-fast 2D and 3D ligand and target descriptors for side effect prediction and network analysis in polypharmacology.

Authors:  Alvaro Cortés-Cabrera; Garrett M Morris; Paul W Finn; Antonio Morreale; Federico Gago
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  Prediction of off-target drug effects through data fusion.

Authors:  Emmanuel R Yera; Ann E Cleves; Ajay N Jain
Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput       Date:  2014

Review 3.  90 years of monoamine oxidase: some progress and some confusion.

Authors:  Keith F Tipton
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 3.575

4.  Does your model weigh the same as a duck?

Authors:  Ajay N Jain; Ann E Cleves
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Relating Essential Proteins to Drug Side-Effects Using Canonical Component Analysis: A Structure-Based Approach.

Authors:  Tianyun Liu; Russ B Altman
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Candidate Therapeutics by Screening for Multitargeting Ligands: Combining the CB2 Receptor With CB1, PPARγ and 5-HT4 Receptors.

Authors:  Shayma El-Atawneh; Amiram Goldblum
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 5.810

7.  A targeted library screen reveals a new inhibitor scaffold for protein kinase D.

Authors:  Manuj Tandon; Lirong Wang; Qi Xu; Xiangqun Xie; Peter Wipf; Qiming Jane Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Knowledge-guided docking: accurate prospective prediction of bound configurations of novel ligands using Surflex-Dock.

Authors:  Ann E Cleves; Ajay N Jain
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Prospective performance evaluation of selected common virtual screening tools. Case study: Cyclooxygenase (COX) 1 and 2.

Authors:  Teresa Kaserer; Veronika Temml; Zsofia Kutil; Tomas Vanek; Premysl Landa; Daniela Schuster
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 6.514

10.  Substrate-driven mapping of the degradome by comparison of sequence logos.

Authors:  Julian E Fuchs; Susanne von Grafenstein; Roland G Huber; Christian Kramer; Klaus R Liedl
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.