Literature DB >> 18072477

Fast prostate segmentation in 3D TRUS images based on continuity constraint using an autoregressive model.

Mingyue Ding1, Bernard Chiu, Igor Gyacskov, Xiaping Yuan, Maria Drangova, Dònal B Downey, Aaron Fenster.   

Abstract

In this article a new slice-based 3D prostate segmentation method based on a continuity constraint, implemented as an autoregressive (AR) model is described. In order to decrease the propagated segmentation error produced by the slice-based 3D segmentation method, a continuity constraint was imposed in the prostate segmentation algorithm. A 3D ultrasound image was segmented using the slice-based segmentation method. Then, a cross-sectional profile of the resulting contours was obtained by intersecting the 2D segmented contours with a coronal plane passing through the midpoint of the manually identified rotational axis, which is considered to be the approximate center of the prostate. On the coronal cross-sectional plane, these intersections form a set of radial lines directed from the center of the prostate. The lengths of these radial lines were smoothed using an AR model. Slice-based 3D segmentations were performed in the clockwise and in the anticlockwise directions, where clockwise and anticlockwise are defined with respect to the propagation directions on the coronal view. This resulted in two different segmentations for each 2D slice. For each pair of unmatched segments, in which the distance between the contour generated clockwise and that generated anticlockwise was greater than 4 mm, a method was used to select the optimal contour. Experiments performed using 3D prostate ultrasound images of nine patients demonstrated that the proposed method produced accurate 3D prostate boundaries without manual editing. The average distance between the proposed method and manual segmentation was 1.29 mm. The average intraobserver coefficient of variation (i.e., the standard deviation divided by the average volume) of the boundaries segmented by the proposed method was 1.6%. The average segmentation time of a 352 x 379 x 704 image on a Pentium IV 2.8 GHz PC was 10 s.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18072477     DOI: 10.1118/1.2777005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  11 in total

1.  Fast plaque burden assessment of the femoral artery using 3D black-blood MRI and automated segmentation.

Authors:  Bernard Chiu; Jie Sun; Xihai Zhao; Jinnan Wang; Niranjan Balu; Jiachang Chi; Jianrong Xu; Chun Yuan; William S Kerwin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  3D ultrasound image segmentation using wavelet support vector machines.

Authors:  Hamed Akbari; Baowei Fei
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Prostate segmentation in HIFU therapy.

Authors:  Carole Garnier; Jean-Jacques Bellanger; Ke Wu; Huazhong Shu; Nathalie Costet; Romain Mathieu; Renaud de Crevoisier; Jean-Louis Coatrieux
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-11-29       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  3D Prostate Segmentation of Ultrasound Images Combining Longitudinal Image Registration and Machine Learning.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Yang; Baowei Fei
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2012-02-23

5.  Contemporary technique of intraoperative 3-dimensional ultrasonography-guided transperineal prostate cryotherapy.

Authors:  Venu Chalasani; Lori Gardi; Carlos H Martinez; Donal B Downey; Aaron Fenster; Joseph L Chin
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Three-dimensional ultrasound scanning.

Authors:  Aaron Fenster; Grace Parraga; Jeff Bax
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 3.906

7.  Evaluation of uterine ultrasound imaging in cervical radiotherapy; a comparison of autoscan and conventional probe.

Authors:  Mariwan Baker; David T Cooper; Claus F Behrens
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Segmentation of prostate from ultrasound images using level sets on active band and intensity variation across edges.

Authors:  Xu Li; Chunming Li; Andriy Fedorov; Tina Kapur; Xiaoping Yang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  A Molecular Image-directed, 3D Ultrasound-guided Biopsy System for the Prostate.

Authors:  Baowei Fei; David M Schuster; Viraj Master; Hamed Akbari; Aaron Fenster; Peter Nieh
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2012-02-16

10.  Ultrasound prostate segmentation based on multidirectional deeply supervised V-Net.

Authors:  Yang Lei; Sibo Tian; Xiuxiu He; Tonghe Wang; Bo Wang; Pretesh Patel; Ashesh B Jani; Hui Mao; Walter J Curran; Tian Liu; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.