Literature DB >> 18071719

Safety and morbidity after ultra-low coloanal anastomoses: J-pouch vs end-to-end reconstruction.

Thomas Steffen1, Ignazio Tarantino, Franc Heinrich Hetzer, René Warschkow, Jochen Lange, Michael Zünd.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Anastomotic failure after ultra-low anterior rectum resection is the most important complication, and it is influenced by the type of reconstruction. The aim of this study was to compare retrospectively the straight coloanal anastomosis with the J-pouch reconstruction concerning the development of anastomotic leakage.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-six of 381 consecutive patients underwent low anterior rectum resection with total mesorectal excision and ultra-low coloanal anastomosis at 3-4 cm from the anocutan line. A 5-cm J-pouch (side-to-end) was performed in 25, a straight coloanal anastomosis in 25, and a coloplasty in 6 patients, respectively. RESULTS/
FINDINGS: No influence by age, body mass index, and operating time on anastomotic leakage rate was found. Leakage was found in eight patients with straight coloanal anastomosis, resulting in a leakage rate of 32% compared to one patient in the J-pouch group (P = 0.023). INTERPRETATION/
CONCLUSION: Patient's safety is higher after J-pouch reconstruction because of the lower anastomotic failure rate, and functional results had been reported as similar after J-pouch reconstruction and straight coloanal anastomosis. Therefore, we clearly argue for a J-pouch reconstruction as the standard method after ultra-low coloanal anastomosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18071719     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-007-0414-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  28 in total

Review 1.  Does anastomotic technique influence anorectal function after sphincter-saving rectal cancer resection? A systematic review of evidence from randomized trials.

Authors:  Jamie Murphy; Tobby M Hammond; Charles H Knowles; S Mark Scott; Peter J Lunniss; Norman S Williams
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Anastomotic leakage and functional outcome after anterior resection of the rectum.

Authors:  O Hallböök; R Sjödahl
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Randomized comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomosis after low anterior resection.

Authors:  O Hallböök; L Påhlman; M Krog; S D Wexner; R Sjödahl
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  W I Law; K W Chu; J W Ho; C W Chan
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  [Colo-anal anastomosis: improvement of early function outcome by reconstruction with the colonic pouch].

Authors:  P Götzinger; P Wamser; F Herbst
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  Small colonic J-pouch improves colonic retention of liquids--randomized, controlled trial with scintigraphy.

Authors:  Yik-Hong Ho; Sidney Yu; Ee-Sin Ang; F Seow-Choen; Felix Sundram
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Colonic pouch vs. side-to-end anastomosis in low anterior resection.

Authors:  F T Huber; B Herter; J R Siewert
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Influence of a defunctioning stoma on leakage rates after low colorectal anastomosis and colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  N Dehni; R D Schlegel; C Cunningham; M Guiguet; E Tiret; R Parc
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Resection of the rectum with construction of a colonic reservoir and colo-anal anastomosis for carcinoma of the rectum.

Authors:  F Lazorthes; P Fages; P Chiotasso; J Lemozy; E Bloom
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Resection and colo-anal anastomosis with colonic reservoir for rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  R Parc; E Tiret; P Frileux; E Moszkowski; J Loygue
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Risk factors and predictive factors for anastomotic leakage after resection for colorectal cancer: reappraisal of the literature.

Authors:  Fumihiko Fujita; Yasuhiro Torashima; Tamotsu Kuroki; Susumu Eguchi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Baseline mortality-adjusted survival in colon cancer patients.

Authors:  Kristjan Ukegjini; Marcel Zadnikar; Rene Warschkow; Sascha Müller; Bruno M Schmied; Lukas Marti
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Comparison of the colonic J-pouch versus straight (end-to-end) anastomosis following low anterior resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shafquat Zaman; Ali Yasen Y Mohamedahmed; Adewale Adeoba Ayeni; Elizabeth Peterknecht; Sadiq Mawji; Mohamed Albendary; Rajnish Mankotia; Akinfemi Akingboye
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Transanal natural orifice specimen extraction for laparoscopic anterior resection in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Fang-Hai Han; Li-Xin Hua; Zhi Zhao; Jian-Hai Wu; Wen-Hua Zhan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Comparison of Colonic J-pouch and Straight Coloanal anastomosis after Low Anterior Resection.

Authors:  Shaban Mehrvarz; Seyed Mohsen Towliat; Hassan Ali Mohebbi; Saieed Derakhshani; Mahdi Abavisani
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 0.611

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.