Literature DB >> 8678619

Randomized comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomosis after low anterior resection.

O Hallböök1, L Påhlman, M Krog, S D Wexner, R Sjödahl.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The authors compared clinical bowel function and complications of a low anterior resection with either a straight or colonic J pouch anastomosis. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Urgency and frequent bowel movements after rectal resection with a low anastomosis have been related to the loss of rectal reservoir function. Reconstruction with a colonic J pouch possibly can obviate some of this dysfunction. Earlier reports have been favorable, but they must be verified in randomized trials.
METHOD: One hundred patients with rectal cancer in whom a sphincter-saving procedure was appropriate were randomized to reconstruction with either a straight or a colonic J pouch anastomosis.
RESULTS: The incidence of symptomatic anastomotic leakage was lower in the pouch group (2% vs. 15%, p = 0.03). Eighty-nine patients could be evaluated after 1 year. The pouch patients had significantly fewer bowel movements per 24 hours, and less nocturnal evacuations, urgency, and incontinence. Overall well-being owing to the bowel function was rated significantly higher by the pouch patients.
CONCLUSION: Reconstruction with a colonic J pouch was associated with a lower incidence of anastomotic leakage and better clinical bowel function when compared with the traditional straight anastomosis. Functional superiority was especially evident during the first 2 months.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8678619      PMCID: PMC1235247          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199607000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  19 in total

1.  Low end to side rectosigmoidal anastomosis; description of technic.

Authors:  J W BAKER
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1950-07

2.  Carcinoma of the rectum and the rectosigmoid. A review of 729 cases.

Authors:  R M Zollinger; M H Sheppard
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1971-04

Review 3.  The rationale for preservation of the anal sphincter in patients with low rectal cancer.

Authors:  N S Williams
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Laser Doppler blood flow measurement in rectal resection for carcinoma--comparison between the straight and colonic J pouch reconstruction.

Authors:  O Hallböök; K Johansson; R Sjödahl
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Decrease in the anorectal pressure gradient after low anterior resection of the rectum. A study using continuous ambulatory manometry.

Authors:  M E Williamson; W G Lewis; P J Holdsworth; P J Finan; D Johnston
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Resection and colo-anal anastomosis with colonic reservoir for rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  R Parc; E Tiret; P Frileux; E Moszkowski; J Loygue
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  The long term effect of sphincter preserving operations for rectal carcinoma on function of the anal sphincter in man.

Authors:  N S Williams; R Price; D Johnston
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  New perspective in the treatment of low rectal cancer: total rectal resection and coloendoanal anastomosis.

Authors:  E Leo; F Belli; M T Baldini; M Vitellaro; L Mascheroni; S Andreola; M Bellomi; R Zucali
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Prospective randomized trial comparing J colonic pouch-anal anastomosis and straight coloanal reconstruction.

Authors:  F Seow-Choen; H S Goh
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Coloanal anastomosis: are functional results better with a pouch?

Authors:  H Ortiz; M De Miguel; P Armendáriz; J Rodriguez; C Chocarro
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  67 in total

1.  Detection of a rectocele-like prolapse in the colonic J-pouch using pouchography: cause or effect of evacuation difficulties?

Authors:  J Hida; M Yasutomi; T Maruyama; T Yoshifuji; T Tokoro; T Wakano; T Uchida; K Ueda
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Comparison of J-pouch and coloplasty pouch for low rectal cancers: a randomized, controlled trial investigating functional results and comparative anastomotic leak rates.

Authors:  Yik-Hong Ho; Steven Brown; Siu-Meng Heah; Charles Tsang; Francis Seow-Choen; Kong-Weng Eu; Choong Leong Tang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  [Reconstructive surgery after anterior resection of the rectum].

Authors:  S Willis; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Ileocecal reservoir reconstruction after total mesorectal excision: functional results of the long-term follow-up.

Authors:  C T Hamel; J Metzger; G Curti; L Degen; F Harder; M O von Flüe
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Is laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery equal to open surgery? An evidence based perspective.

Authors:  Beat M Künzli; Helmut Friess; Shailesh V Shrikhande
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-04-27

Review 6.  Pouch operation for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jin-ichi Hida; Kiyotaka Okuno
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Long-term functional outcome of colonic J-pouch reconstruction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jin-Ichi Hida; Takehito Yoshifuji; Kiyotaka Okuno; Tomohiko Matsuzaki; Toshihiro Uchida; Eizaburou Ishimaru; Tadao Tokoro; Masayuki Yasutomi; Hitoshi Shiozaki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 8.  A systematic review of the function and complications of colonic pouches.

Authors:  Poh-Koon Koh; Choong-Leong Tang; Kong-Weng Eu; Miny Samuel; Edwin Chan
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-09-13       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  [The transverse coloplasty pouch after low anterior resection: early postoperative results].

Authors:  A Ulrich; K Z'graggen; B Schmied; J Weitz; M W Büchler
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 0.955

10.  Reconstruction techniques after proctectomy: what's the best?

Authors:  Sebastian G de la Fuente; Christopher R Mantyh
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.