Literature DB >> 18070010

Endoscopic mucosal resection: not only therapeutic, but a diagnostic procedure for sessile gastric polyps.

Tibor Szalóki1, Veronika Tóth, István Németh, László Tiszlavicz, János Lonovics, László Czakó.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Histological examination of specimens obtained by forceps biopsy sampling of gastric lesions is of limited accuracy, and their management on this basis is therefore controversial. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) was initially developed in Japan for the resection of early gastric cancer (EGC). The potential use of EMR as a diagnostic tool has been suggested. The aims of the present study were to assess the value of forceps biopsy sampling in establishing the correct diagnosis revealed by EMR and to evaluate the efficacy of EMR.
METHODS: Fifty-six subjects with sessile gastric polyps of epithelial origin, at least 0.5 cm in diameter, and not associated with polyposis syndromes, were included. Following forceps biopsy sampling, EMR was performed with an inject-and-cut technique or with cap-fitted methods. The histological results on the forceps biopsy and the resected specimens were analyzed.
RESULTS: Histology on the resected specimens revealed neoplastic lesions in 34 cases, including seven EGC, and there were hyperplastic-inflammatory lesions in 21 cases. Complete agreement between the previous histological results of the forceps biopsy samples and the resected specimens was seen in only 76.7% of the lesions. Altogether, the sensitivity and specificity of the forceps biopsy procedure for diagnosing neoplastic lesions were 87.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 76.0-98.9%) and 65.2% (95% CI = 45.7-84.7), respectively. A clinically relevant discrimination between neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions was not achieved in seven cases. No complications, such as perforation or massive bleeding necessitating surgical treatment, were encountered. EMR was considered complete in five patients. None of the EGC recurred during the mean 38-month (6-72) follow up.
CONCLUSIONS: Forceps biopsy is not fully representative of the entire lesion, and a simple biopsy may therefore lead to a faulty differentiation between neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions. EMR proposes diagnostic and staging advantage in assessing patients with EGC as compared to forceps biopsy, because it provides more intact mucosa and submucosa for histological analysis. Sessile gastric polyps should be fully resected by EMR for a final diagnosis and (depending on the lesion size and type) possibly definitive treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18070010     DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2007.05247.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0815-9319            Impact factor:   4.029


  12 in total

1.  Discrepancies in histologic diagnoses of early gastric cancer between biopsy and endoscopic mucosal resection specimens.

Authors:  Madoka Takao; Naomi Kakushima; Kohei Takizawa; Masaki Tanaka; Yuichiro Yamaguchi; Hiroyuki Matsubayashi; Kimihide Kusafuka; Hiroyuki Ono
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 7.370

2.  A randomized trial to determine the diagnostic accuracy of conventional vs. jumbo forceps biopsy of gastric epithelial neoplasias before endoscopic submucosal dissection; open-label study.

Authors:  Hyo Keun Jeon; Ho Yoel Ryu; Mee Yon Cho; Hyun-Soo Kim; Jae Woo Kim; Hong Jun Park; Moon Young Kim; Soon Koo Baik; Sang Ok Kwon; Su Yeon Park; Sung Ho Won
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 7.370

3.  Treatment strategy for gastric non-invasive intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosed by endoscopic biopsy.

Authors:  Tsutomu Nishida; Shusaku Tsutsui; Motohiko Kato; Takuya Inoue; Shunsuke Yamamoto; Yoshito Hayashi; Tomofumi Akasaka; Takuya Yamada; Shinichiro Shinzaki; Hideki Iijima; Masahiko Tsujii; Tetsuo Takehara
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2011-12-15

4.  Discrepancy between endoscopic forceps biopsy and endoscopic resection in gastric epithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  Hyun Lim; Hwoon-Yong Jung; Young Soo Park; Hee Kyong Na; Ji Yong Ahn; Ji Young Choi; Jeong Hoon Lee; Mi-Young Kim; Kwi-Sook Choi; Do Hoon Kim; Kee Don Choi; Ho June Song; Gin Hyug Lee; Jin-Ho Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Intermittent gastric outlet obstruction caused by a prolapsing antral gastric polyp.

Authors:  Mehul Parikh; Brian Kelley; Gabriel Rendon; Bincy Abraham
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2010-05-15

6.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection as a treatment for gastric noninvasive neoplasia: a multicenter study by Osaka University ESD Study Group.

Authors:  Motohiko Kato; Tsutomu Nishida; Shusaku Tsutsui; Masato Komori; Tomoki Michida; Katsumi Yamamoto; Naoki Kawai; Shinji Kitamura; Shinichiro Zushi; Akihiro Nishihara; Fumihiko Nakanishi; Kazuo Kinoshita; Takuya Yamada; Hideki Iijima; Masahiko Tsujii; Norio Hayashi
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 7.527

7.  Endoscopic ultrasonographic assessment of gastric polyps and endoscopic mucosal resection.

Authors:  Brintha K Enestvedt; Vinay Chandrasekhara; Gregory G Ginsberg
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2012-12

8.  The Diagnostic Accuracy of Conventional Forceps Biopsy Compared to ESD.

Authors:  Shimin Wu; Xinjian Zhu; Lijuan Xiang; Jianqiang Chen; Chunxiao Chen
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2017-08-12

Review 9.  Is screening and surveillance for early detection of gastric cancer needed in Korean Americans?

Authors:  Gwang Ha Kim; Sung Jo Bang; Alexander R Ende; Joo Ha Hwang
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 2.884

10.  Antral hyperplastic polyp: A rare cause of gastric outlet obstruction.

Authors:  Ibrahim Aydin; Ender Ozer; Halil Rakici; Ibrahim Sehitoglu; Ahmet Fikret Yucel; Ahmet Pergel; Dursun Ali Sahin
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2014-03-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.