Literature DB >> 21107615

Endoscopic submucosal dissection as a treatment for gastric noninvasive neoplasia: a multicenter study by Osaka University ESD Study Group.

Motohiko Kato1, Tsutomu Nishida, Shusaku Tsutsui, Masato Komori, Tomoki Michida, Katsumi Yamamoto, Naoki Kawai, Shinji Kitamura, Shinichiro Zushi, Akihiro Nishihara, Fumihiko Nakanishi, Kazuo Kinoshita, Takuya Yamada, Hideki Iijima, Masahiko Tsujii, Norio Hayashi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treatment with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastric noninvasive neoplasia (NIN) diagnosed by endoscopic forceps biopsy specimen, whether as a follow-up or "total incisional biopsy", is controversial. To validate the use of ESD for total incisional biopsy in NIN, we examined the underdiagnosis rate of NIN and the rates of complication associated with ESD.
METHODS: This is a cross-sectional multicenter retrospective study from 10 hospitals. Subjects diagnosed with NIN (equivalent to category 3 or 4.1 of the Vienna classification) by endoscopic forceps biopsy and treated with ESD were included. From March 2003 to December 2009, a total of 468 subjects were included and analyzed. The underdiagnosis rate was defined as the proportion of lesions diagnosed with adenocarcinoma after ESD. We assessed the complete en-bloc resection rate and the complication rate of ESD.
RESULTS: Among the 468 subjects with NIN, 205 were diagnosed with adenocarcinoma after ESD, with an underdiagnosis rate of 44% (95% confidence interval: 39-49%). Two submucosal cancer lesions had invaded beyond 500 μm and one had lymphatic involvement. The complete en-bloc resection rate was 97%. The incidences of post-ESD bleeding, perforation, and serious complications were 5.5, 4.7, and 0.43%, respectively. There were no procedure-related deaths.
CONCLUSIONS: In this large-scale, multicenter cross-sectional study, over 40% of the noninvasive gastric neoplasia specimens were determined to have adenocarcinoma, and the ESD-related complication rate was relatively low. Therefore, ESD was useful and may be a therapeutic option for gastric NIN.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21107615     DOI: 10.1007/s00535-010-0350-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0944-1174            Impact factor:   7.527


  17 in total

Review 1.  The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Diagnostic accuracy of forceps biopsy versus polypectomy for gastric polyps: a prospective multicentre study.

Authors:  S M Muehldorfer; M Stolte; P Martus; E G Hahn; C Ell
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Flat gastric polyps: results of forceps biopsy, endoscopic mucosal resection, and long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Tibor Szalóki; Veronika Tóth; László Tiszlavicz; László Czakó
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.423

4.  Short-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric neoplasm: multicenter survey by osaka university ESD study group.

Authors:  Tomofumi Akasaka; Tsutomu Nishida; Shusaku Tsutsui; Tomoki Michida; Takuya Yamada; Hideharu Ogiyama; Shinji Kitamura; Makoto Ichiba; Masato Komori; Osamu Nishiyama; Fumihiko Nakanishi; Shinichiro Zushi; Akihiro Nishihara; Hideki Iijima; Masahiko Tsujii; Norio Hayashi
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 7.559

5.  The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  R J Schlemper; R H Riddell; Y Kato; F Borchard; H S Cooper; S M Dawsey; M F Dixon; C M Fenoglio-Preiser; J F Fléjou; K Geboes; T Hattori; T Hirota; M Itabashi; M Iwafuchi; A Iwashita; Y I Kim; T Kirchner; M Klimpfinger; M Koike; G Y Lauwers; K J Lewin; G Oberhuber; F Offner; A B Price; C A Rubio; M Shimizu; T Shimoda; P Sipponen; E Solcia; M Stolte; H Watanabe; H Yamabe
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  The long term outcome of gastric non-invasive neoplasia.

Authors:  M Rugge; M Cassaro; F Di Mario; G Leo; G Leandro; V M Russo; G Pennelli; F Farinati
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Risk factors for complications of endoscopic submucosal dissection in gastric tumors: analysis of 478 lesions.

Authors:  Kotaro Mannen; Seiji Tsunada; Megumi Hara; Kanako Yamaguchi; Yasuhisa Sakata; Takehiro Fujise; Takahiro Noda; Ryo Shimoda; Hiroyuki Sakata; Shinichi Ogata; Ryuichi Iwakiri; Kazuma Fujimoto
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 7.527

8.  Depressed adenoma of the stomach.

Authors:  K Nakamura; H Sakaguchi; M Enjoji
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1988-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Gastric cancer risk in patients with premalignant gastric lesions: a nationwide cohort study in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Annemarie C de Vries; Nicole C T van Grieken; Caspar W N Looman; Mariël K Casparie; Esther de Vries; Gerrit A Meijer; Ernst J Kuipers
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a large-scale feasibility study.

Authors:  H Isomoto; S Shikuwa; N Yamaguchi; E Fukuda; K Ikeda; H Nishiyama; K Ohnita; Y Mizuta; J Shiozawa; S Kohno
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  52 in total

1.  Shall we use endoscopic submucosal dissection for every gastric neoplasia?

Authors:  László Czakó; Viktória Terzin; Tibor Szalóki
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 7.527

2.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasms.

Authors:  Kuniomi Honda; Hirotada Akiho
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2012-04-15

3.  Management and associated factors of delayed perforation after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Authors:  Haruhisa Suzuki; Ichiro Oda; Masau Sekiguchi; Seiichiro Abe; Satoru Nonaka; Shigetaka Yoshinaga; Takeshi Nakajima; Yutaka Saito
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging is useful in the differential diagnosis between low-grade adenoma and early cancer of superficial elevated gastric lesions.

Authors:  Shinichiro Maki; Kenshi Yao; Takashi Nagahama; Takahiro Beppu; Takashi Hisabe; Yasuhiro Takaki; Fumihito Hirai; Toshiyuki Matsui; Hiroshi Tanabe; Akinori Iwashita
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 7.370

5.  Training in endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Authors:  Roxana M Coman; Takuji Gotoda; Peter V Draganov
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-08-16

Review 6.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection for malignant esophageal lesions.

Authors:  Hazem Hammad; Tonya Kaltenbach; Roy Soetikno
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2014

Review 7.  Optimal management of biopsy-proven low-grade gastric dysplasia.

Authors:  Jung-Wook Kim; Jae Young Jang
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-04-16

8.  Can endoscopic submucosal dissection be safely performed in a smaller specialized clinic?

Authors:  Naondo Sohara; Satoshi Hagiwara; Riki Arai; Haruhisa Iizuka; Yasuhiro Onozato; Satoru Kakizaki
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Clinical features of negative pathologic results after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Authors:  Dong Il Jeong; Hyung Wook Kim; Cheol Woong Choi; Dae Hwan Kang; Su Bum Park; Su Jin Kim; Hyeong Seok Nam
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Endoscopic transgastric drainage of a gastric wall abscess after endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Authors:  Osamu Dohi; Moyu Dohi; Ken Inoue; Yasuyuki Gen; Masayasu Jo; Kazuhiko Tokita
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.