OBJECTIVE: To document time allocated to care management activities and care manager workload capacity using data collected for studies of telephone care management of depression. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional, descriptive analysis of depression care manager (DCM) activities and workload in 2 collaborative depression care interventions (1 implementation study and 1 effectiveness study) at Department of Veterans Affairs primary care facilities. METHODS: Each intervention tracked specific care management activities for 4 weeks, recording the number of events for each activity type and length of time for each activity. Patient workload data were obtained from the patient tracking systems for the 2 projects. We calculated the average time for each activity type, the average total time required to complete an initial assessment call and follow-up call, and the maximum patient panel for both projects. RESULTS: The total time per successful initial assessment was 75 to 95 minutes, and the total time per successful follow-up call was 51 to 60 minutes, with more time spent on ancillary activities (precall preparation, postcall documentation, and provider communication) than on direct patient contact. A significant amount of time was spent in unsuccessful call attempts, requiring 9 to 11 minutes for each attempt. The maximum panel size per care manager per quarter was in the range of 143 to 165 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The study found similar DCM time allocations and panel sizes across 2 studies and 3 regions with full-time DCMs. Reductions in DCM time spent on ancillary activities may be achievable through improved informatics and other support for panel management.
OBJECTIVE: To document time allocated to care management activities and care manager workload capacity using data collected for studies of telephone care management of depression. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional, descriptive analysis of depression care manager (DCM) activities and workload in 2 collaborative depression care interventions (1 implementation study and 1 effectiveness study) at Department of Veterans Affairs primary care facilities. METHODS: Each intervention tracked specific care management activities for 4 weeks, recording the number of events for each activity type and length of time for each activity. Patient workload data were obtained from the patient tracking systems for the 2 projects. We calculated the average time for each activity type, the average total time required to complete an initial assessment call and follow-up call, and the maximum patient panel for both projects. RESULTS: The total time per successful initial assessment was 75 to 95 minutes, and the total time per successful follow-up call was 51 to 60 minutes, with more time spent on ancillary activities (precall preparation, postcall documentation, and provider communication) than on direct patient contact. A significant amount of time was spent in unsuccessful call attempts, requiring 9 to 11 minutes for each attempt. The maximum panel size per care manager per quarter was in the range of 143 to 165 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The study found similar DCM time allocations and panel sizes across 2 studies and 3 regions with full-time DCMs. Reductions in DCM time spent on ancillary activities may be achievable through improved informatics and other support for panel management.
Authors: Gregory E Simon; James D Ralston; James Savarino; Chester Pabiniak; Christine Wentzel; Belinda H Operskalski Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2011-03-08 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Chuan-Fen Liu; Lisa V Rubenstein; JoAnn E Kirchner; John C Fortney; Mark W Perkins; Scott K Ober; Jeffrey M Pyne; Edmund F Chaney Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Sanjay Basu; Bruce E Landon; John W Williams; Asaf Bitton; Zirui Song; Russell S Phillips Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: James E Aikens; Marcia Valenstein; Melissa A Plegue; Ananda Sen; Nicolle Marinec; Eric Achtyes; John D Piette Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2021-06-04 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Laura M Bonner; Carol E Simons; Louise E Parker; Elizabeth M Yano; Joann E Kirchner Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2010-08-20 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Jeffrey L Smith; John W Williams; Richard R Owen; Lisa V Rubenstein; Edmund Chaney Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2008-12-31 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Marcia Valenstein; Daniel Eisenberg; John F McCarthy; Karen L Austin; Dara Ganoczy; Hyungjin Myra Kim; Kara Zivin; John D Piette; Mark Olfson; Frederic C Blow Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 4.157