Sanjay Basu1,2, Bruce E Landon3,4,5, John W Williams6, Asaf Bitton3,5,7,8, Zirui Song3,5,9, Russell S Phillips3,4. 1. Center for Population Health Sciences and Center for Primary Care and Outcomes Research, Departments of Medicine and of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University, 1070 Arastradero Road, Office 282, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA. basus@stanford.edu. 2. Center for Primary Care, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. basus@stanford.edu. 3. Center for Primary Care, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 4. Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA. 5. Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 6. Departments of Medicine and Psychiatry, Duke University School of Medicine and Center of Innovation for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham VA Health System, Durham, NC, USA. 7. Division of General Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 8. Ariadne Labs, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. 9. Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: New payments from Medicare encourage behavioral health services to be integrated into primary care practice activities. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the financial impact for primary care practices of integrating behavioral health services. DESIGN: Microsimulation model. PARTICIPANTS: We simulated patients and providers at federally qualified health centers (FQHCs), non-FQHCs in urban and rural high-poverty areas, and practices outside of high-poverty areas surveyed by the National Association of Community Health Centers, National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, and National Health Interview Survey. INTERVENTIONS: A collaborative care model (CoCM), involving telephone-based follow-up from a behaviorist care manager, or a primary care behaviorist model (PCBM), involving an in-clinic behaviorist. MAIN MEASURES: Net revenue change per full-time physician. KEY RESULTS: When behavioral health integration services were offered only to Medicare patients, net revenue was higher under CoCM (averaging $25,026 per MD in year 1 and $28,548/year in subsequent years) than PCBM (-$7052 in year 1 and -$3706/year in subsequent years). When behavioral health integration services were offered to all patients and were reimbursed by Medicare and private payers, only practices adopting the CoCM approach consistently gained net revenues. The outcomes of the model were sensitive to rates of patient referral acceptance, presentation, and therapy completion, but the CoCM approach remained consistently financially viable whereas PCBM would not be in the long-run across practice types. CONCLUSIONS: New Medicare payments may offer financial viability for primary care practices to integrate behavioral health services, but this viability depends on the approach toward care integration.
BACKGROUND: New payments from Medicare encourage behavioral health services to be integrated into primary care practice activities. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the financial impact for primary care practices of integrating behavioral health services. DESIGN: Microsimulation model. PARTICIPANTS: We simulated patients and providers at federally qualified health centers (FQHCs), non-FQHCs in urban and rural high-poverty areas, and practices outside of high-poverty areas surveyed by the National Association of Community Health Centers, National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, and National Health Interview Survey. INTERVENTIONS: A collaborative care model (CoCM), involving telephone-based follow-up from a behaviorist care manager, or a primary care behaviorist model (PCBM), involving an in-clinic behaviorist. MAIN MEASURES: Net revenue change per full-time physician. KEY RESULTS: When behavioral health integration services were offered only to Medicare patients, net revenue was higher under CoCM (averaging $25,026 per MD in year 1 and $28,548/year in subsequent years) than PCBM (-$7052 in year 1 and -$3706/year in subsequent years). When behavioral health integration services were offered to all patients and were reimbursed by Medicare and private payers, only practices adopting the CoCM approach consistently gained net revenues. The outcomes of the model were sensitive to rates of patient referral acceptance, presentation, and therapy completion, but the CoCM approach remained consistently financially viable whereas PCBM would not be in the long-run across practice types. CONCLUSIONS: New Medicare payments may offer financial viability for primary care practices to integrate behavioral health services, but this viability depends on the approach toward care integration.
Entities:
Keywords:
behavioral health; cost-benefit analysis; costs; mental health; primary care
Authors: Emily Woltmann; Andrew Grogan-Kaylor; Brian Perron; Hebert Georges; Amy M Kilbourne; Mark S Bauer Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Matthew J Press; Ryan Howe; Michael Schoenbaum; Sean Cavanaugh; Ann Marshall; Lindsey Baldwin; Patrick H Conway Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-12-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: G E Simon; W J Katon; M VonKorff; J Unützer; E H Lin; E A Walker; T Bush; C Rutter; E Ludman Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2001-10 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Chuan-Fen Liu; Lisa V Rubenstein; JoAnn E Kirchner; John C Fortney; Mark W Perkins; Scott K Ober; Jeffrey M Pyne; Edmund F Chaney Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Chuan-Fen Liu; John Fortney; Susan Vivell; Karen Vollen; William N Raney; Barbara Revay; Maurilio Garcia-Maldonado; Jeffrey Pyne; Lisa V Rubenstein; Edmund Chaney Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Chuan Mei Lee; Claudia Scheuter; Danielle Rochlin; Terry Platchek; Robert M Kaplan Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Danielle H Rochlin; Chuan-Mei Lee; Claudia Scheuter; Terry Platchek; Robert M Kaplan; Arnold Milstein Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2020-09-22 Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Sung Eun Choi; Lisa Simon; Jane R Barrow; Nathan Palmer; Sanjay Basu; Russell S Phillips Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-03-24 Impact factor: 3.390