James E Aikens1, Marcia Valenstein2,3, Melissa A Plegue1, Ananda Sen1,4, Nicolle Marinec3,5, Eric Achtyes6,7, John D Piette3,5. 1. Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. 2. Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. 3. VA Ann Arbor Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. 4. Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. 5. Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. 6. Cherry Health, Heart of the City Health Center, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA. 7. Division of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Abstract
Purpose: To test whether technology-facilitated self-management support improves depression in primary care settings. Methods: We randomized 204 low-income primary care patients who had at least moderate depressive symptoms to intervention or control. Intervention participants received 12 months of weekly automated interactive voice response telephone calls that assessed their symptom severity and provided self-management strategies. Their patient-nominated supporter (CarePartner) received corresponding guidance on self-management support, and their primary care team received urgent notifications. Those randomized to enhanced usual care received printed generic self-management instructions. Results: One-year attrition rate was 14%. By month 6, symptom severity on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) decreased 2.5 points more in the intervention arm than in the control arm (95% CI -4.2 to -0.8, p = 0.003). This benefit was similar at month 12 (p = 0.004). Intervention was also over twice as likely to lead to ≥50% reduction in symptom severity by month 6 (OR = 2.2 (1.1, 4.7)) and a decrease of ≥5 PHQ-9 points by month 12 (OR = 2.3 (1.2, 4.4)). Conclusions: Technology-facilitated self-management guidance with lay support and clinician notifications improves depression for primary care patients. Subsequent research should examine implementation and generalization to other chronic conditions. clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT01834534.
Purpose: To test whether technology-facilitated self-management support improves depression in primary care settings. Methods: We randomized 204 low-income primary care patients who had at least moderate depressive symptoms to intervention or control. Intervention participants received 12 months of weekly automated interactive voice response telephone calls that assessed their symptom severity and provided self-management strategies. Their patient-nominated supporter (CarePartner) received corresponding guidance on self-management support, and their primary care team received urgent notifications. Those randomized to enhanced usual care received printed generic self-management instructions. Results: One-year attrition rate was 14%. By month 6, symptom severity on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) decreased 2.5 points more in the intervention arm than in the control arm (95% CI -4.2 to -0.8, p = 0.003). This benefit was similar at month 12 (p = 0.004). Intervention was also over twice as likely to lead to ≥50% reduction in symptom severity by month 6 (OR = 2.2 (1.1, 4.7)) and a decrease of ≥5 PHQ-9 points by month 12 (OR = 2.3 (1.2, 4.4)). Conclusions: Technology-facilitated self-management guidance with lay support and clinician notifications improves depression for primary care patients. Subsequent research should examine implementation and generalization to other chronic conditions. clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT01834534.
Authors: Joseph Firth; John Torous; Jennifer Nicholas; Rebekah Carney; Abhishek Pratap; Simon Rosenbaum; Jerome Sarris Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 49.548
Authors: Ann-Marie Rosland; Michele Heisler; Mary R Janevic; Cathleen M Connell; Kenneth M Langa; Eve A Kerr; John D Piette Journal: Fam Syst Health Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 1.950
Authors: John D Piette; Dana Striplin; Lawrence Fisher; James E Aikens; Aaron Lee; Nicolle Marinec; Madhura Mansabdar; Jenny Chen; Lynn A Gregory; Christopher S Kim Journal: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf Date: 2019-12-04
Authors: Peter A Coventry; Joanna L Hudson; Evangelos Kontopantelis; Janine Archer; David A Richards; Simon Gilbody; Karina Lovell; Chris Dickens; Linda Gask; Waquas Waheed; Peter Bower Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-09-29 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: John D Piette; Mary Ann Gregor; David Share; Michele Heisler; Steven J Bernstein; Todd Koelling; Paul Chan Journal: Congest Heart Fail Date: 2008 Jan-Feb
Authors: Josune Martín; Angel Padierna; Bob van Wijngaarden; Urko Aguirre; Ane Anton; Pedro Muñoz; José M Quintana Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2015-06-09 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: John D Piette; Dana Striplin; Nicolle Marinec; Jenny Chen; Lynn A Gregory; Denise L Sumerlin; Angela M DeSantis; Carolyn Gibson; Ingrid Crause; Marylena Rouse; James E Aikens Journal: J Clin Trials Date: 2015-10-03