Literature DB >> 12508377

Is analysis of lower esophageal sphincter vector volumes of value in diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease?

Robert E Marsh1, Christopher L Perdue, Ziad T Awad, Patrice Watson, Mohamed Selima, Richard E Davis, Charles J Filipi.   

Abstract

AIM: With successful surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), there is interest in understanding the anti-reflux barrier and its mechanisms of failure. To date, the potential use of vector volumes to predict the DeMeester score has not been adequately explored.
METHODS: 627 patients in the referral database received esophageal manometry and ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring. Study data included LES resting pressure (LESP), overall LES length (OL) and abdominal length (AL), total vector volume (TVV) and intrabdominal vector volume (IVV).
RESULTS: In cases where LESP, TVV or IVV were all below normal, there was an 81.4 % probability of a positive DeMeester score. In cases where all three were normal, there was an 86.9 % probability that the DeMeester score would be negative. Receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) for LESP, TVV and IVV were nearly identical and indicated no useful cut-off values. Logistic regression demonstrated that LESP and IVV had the strongest association with a positive DeMeester score; however, the regression formula was only 76.1 % accurate.
CONCLUSION: While the indices based on TVV, IVV and LESP are more sensitive and specific, respectively, than any single measurement, the measurement of vector volumes does not add significantly to the diagnosis of GERD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12508377      PMCID: PMC4728237          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v9.i1.174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  22 in total

1.  24-h pH monitoring for gastroesophageal reflux disease: already standard but not yet gold?

Authors:  E M Quigley
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Manometry of individual segments of the distal esophageal sphincter. Its relation to functional incompetence.

Authors:  P F Crookes; B K Kaul; T R DeMeester; H J Stein; M Oka
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1993-04

3.  Complications of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Role of the lower esophageal sphincter, esophageal acid and acid/alkaline exposure, and duodenogastric reflux.

Authors:  H J Stein; A P Barlow; T R DeMeester; R A Hinder
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  Symptom priority ranking in the care of gastroesophageal reflux: a review of 1,850 cases.

Authors:  T Martinez-Serna; F Tercero; C J Filipi; T J Dickason; P Watson; S K Mittal; M R Tasset
Journal:  Dig Dis       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.404

5.  Technique, indications, and clinical use of 24 hour esophageal pH monitoring.

Authors:  T R DeMeester; C I Wang; J A Wernly; C A Pellegrini; A G Little; P Klementschitsch; G Bermudez; L F Johnson; D B Skinner
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux in patients with reflux esophagitis.

Authors:  W J Dodds; J Dent; W J Hogan; J F Helm; R Hauser; G K Patel; M S Egide
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-12-16       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Computerized axial manometry of the esophagus. A new method for the assessment of antireflux operations.

Authors:  C T Bombeck; O Vaz; J DeSalvo; P E Donahue; L M Nyhus
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Muscular equivalent of the lower esophageal sphincter.

Authors:  D Liebermann-Meffert; M Allgöwer; P Schmid; A L Blum
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  A new technique for measuring lower oesophageal sphincter competence in patients.

Authors:  P J Byrne; R C Stuart; P Lawlor; T N Walsh; T P Hennessy
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 1.568

10.  Determinants of gastroesophageal junction incompetence: hiatal hernia, lower esophageal sphincter, or both?

Authors:  S Sloan; A W Rademaker; P J Kahrilas
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1992-12-15       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  3 in total

1.  Accurate positioning of the 24-hour pH monitoring catheter: agreement between manometry and pH step-up method in two patient positions.

Authors:  Mehmet-Fatih Can; Gokhan Yagci; Sadettin Cetiner; Mustafa Gulsen; Taner Yigit; Erkan Ozturk; Semih Gorgulu; Turgut Tufan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-12-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Comparison of the efficiencies of esophageal manometry, vector volume analysis and esophagus pH monitoring in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  Emrah Aydın; Rahşan Özcan; Ergun Erdoğan; Gonca Tekant
Journal:  Turk Pediatri Ars       Date:  2015-12-01

3.  A comparative study of 22-channel water-perfusion system and solid-state system with 36-sensors in esophageal manometery.

Authors:  Kun Wang; Li-Ping Duan; Ying Ge; Zhi-Wei Xia; Zhi-Jie Xu
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.067

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.