Literature DB >> 15193689

Gadolinium delayed enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance correlates with clinical measures of myocardial infarction.

W Patricia Ingkanisorn1, Kenneth L Rhoads, Anthony H Aletras, Peter Kellman, Andrew E Arai.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The current study tested the hypothesis that gadolinium delayed enhancement assessment of infarct size correlates with clinical indices of myocardial infarction (MI) in humans. Acute infarct mass by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) was compared with peak troponin I, acute and chronic left ventricular (LV) systolic function, and chronic infarct mass in patients imaged after recent acute MI.
BACKGROUND: Cardiac magnetic resonance accurately determines myocardial viability in patients with chronic ischemic heart disease but is not well validated for recent MI.
METHODS: Patients with first acute MI (n = 33) or chronic MI (n = 10) underwent cine CMR followed by gadolinium delayed enhancement imaging. A follow-up CMR scan was performed on 20 of the 33 acute MI patients and all of the chronic MI patients.
RESULTS: In patients with acute percutaneous coronary intervention, acute MI mass correlated with peak troponin I (r = 0.83, p < 0.001, n = 23). In the 20 acute infarct patients with follow-up CMR scans, the acute infarct size correlated well with the follow-up LV ejection fraction (r = 0.86, p < 0.001). The transmural extent of delayed enhancement imaged acutely correlated inversely with wall thickening measured acutely (p < 0.001) and at follow-up (p < 0.001). Although chronic infarct size was reproducible (11 +/- 4% vs. 12 +/- 7%, p = NS), acute infarct size decreased from 16 +/- 12% to 11 +/- 9% (p < 0.003).
CONCLUSION: In humans imaged shortly after acute MI, gadolinium delayed enhancement acute CMR infarct size correlates with acute and chronic indices of infarct size but will appear to diminish in size on follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15193689     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.02.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  71 in total

1.  Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging findings in non-ST-segment elevation versus ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing early invasive intervention.

Authors:  Jianqiang Xu; Young Bin Song; Joo-Yong Hahn; Sung-A Chang; Sang-Chol Lee; Yeon Hyeon Choe; Seung-Hyuk Choi; Jin-Ho Choi; Sang Hoon Lee; Jae K Oh; Hyeon-Cheol Gwon
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Contrast agents and cardiac MR imaging of myocardial ischemia: from bench to bedside.

Authors:  Pierre Croisille; Didier Revel; Maythem Saeed
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Stem cells to repair the broken heart: much ado about nothing?

Authors:  M Saha; R Zbinden; S R Redwood; M S Marber
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Quantitative myocardial distribution volume from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Nathan A Pack; Edward V R Dibella; Brent D Wilson; Christopher J McGann
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 7.  Prognosis following acute myocardial infarction: insights from cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Kevin J Duffy; Victor A Ferrari
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 8.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the clinical cardiologist.

Authors:  Eric Larose; Josep Rodés-Cabau; Robert Delarochelliere; Gerald Barbeau; Bernard Noel; Olivier Bertrand
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.223

9.  Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: an essential diagnostic aid in suspected myocardial re-infarction in a 40 year old woman.

Authors:  Günter Pilz; Peter Bernhardt; Elisabeth Harrer; Markus Klos; Berthold Höfling
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 5.460

10.  Assessment of myocardial viability with delayed-enhancement MRI in coronary artery disease: A correlative study with coronary artery stenosis using digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Xinxiang Zhao; Yanglin Zhang; Yong Sun; Lin Sun; Renhui Cai
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 2.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.