Literature DB >> 27943099

Incremental value of high b value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3-T for prediction of extracapsular extension in patients with prostate cancer: preliminary experience.

Ayumu Kido1, Tsutomu Tamada2, Teruki Sone2, Naoki Kanomata3, Yoshiyuki Miyaji4, Akira Yamamoto2, Katsuyoshi Ito2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate whether high b value diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) contributes to the improvement of diagnostic ability of extracapsular extension (ECE) in prostate cancer (PC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-three patients with PC underwent multiparametric MRI including DWI (b values: 0, 2000 s/mm2) at 3-T. Two radiologists assessed the presence of ECE and the diagnostic certainty degree using conventional diagnostic method by consensus. Tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC, ×10-3 mm2/s) was also measured. Independent predictors of ECE were identified among PSA, tumor ADC, Gleason score, and conventional MRI. ECE in patients with low diagnostic certainty by conventional MRI was further reevaluated using ADC cutoff value, and the results were combined with those of patients with high diagnostic certainty by conventional MRI (MRI + ADC method).
RESULTS: Tumor ADC was an independent predictor of ECE, and the ADC cutoff value was 0.72. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of conventional MRI and MRI + ADC method in the diagnosis of ECE were 44, 92, and 72%, and 78, 96, and 88%, respectively. Among MRI findings leading to the judgement of low diagnostic certainty, broad tumor contact was most common (72% of the patients).
CONCLUSIONS: The addition of ADC obtained with high b value DWI at 3-T to conventional MRI improved the diagnostic ability of ECE.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apparent diffusion coefficient; Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging; Prediction; Prostatic neoplasm; Tumor staging

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27943099     DOI: 10.1007/s11547-016-0712-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Med        ISSN: 0033-8362            Impact factor:   3.469


  47 in total

1.  Comparison of phased-array 3.0-T and endorectal 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of local staging accuracy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Byung Kwan Park; Bohyun Kim; Chan Kyo Kim; Hyun Moo Lee; Ghee Young Kwon
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging staging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ronil V Chandra; Stefan Heinze; Richard Dowling; Clair Shadbolt; Anthony Costello; John Pedersen
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.872

3.  Detection of extracapsular extension of prostate carcinoma with endorectal and phased-array coil MR imaging: multivariate feature analysis.

Authors:  K K Yu; H Hricak; R Alagappan; D M Chernoff; P Bacchetti; C J Zaloudek
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Value of diffusion-weighted imaging at 3 T for prediction of extracapsular extension in patients with prostate cancer: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Yousun Chong; Chan Kyo Kim; Sung Yoon Park; Byung Kwan Park; Ghee Young Kwon; Jung Jae Park
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Prostate cancer: utility of diffusion-weighted imaging as a marker of side-specific risk of extracapsular extension.

Authors:  Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Hersh Chandarana; Anthony Gilet; Fang-Ming Deng; James S Babb; Jonathan Melamed; Samir S Taneja
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Prostate carcinoma: assessment of diagnostic criteria for capsular penetration on endorectal coil MR images.

Authors:  E K Outwater; R O Petersen; E S Siegelman; L G Gomella; C E Chernesky; D G Mitchell
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  Imaging prostate cancer: a multidisciplinary perspective.

Authors:  Hedvig Hricak; Peter L Choyke; Steven C Eberhardt; Steven A Leibel; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Local staging of prostatic carcinoma: comparison of transrectal sonography and endorectal MR imaging.

Authors:  J C Presti; H Hricak; P A Narayan; K Shinohara; S White; P R Carroll
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Do apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values obtained using high b-values with a 3-T MRI correlate better than a transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsy with true Gleason scores obtained from radical prostatectomy specimens for patients with prostate cancer?

Authors:  Kazuhiro Kitajima; Satoru Takahashi; Yoshiko Ueno; Hideaki Miyake; Masato Fujisawa; Fumi Kawakami; Kazuro Sugimura
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.528

10.  ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012.

Authors:  Jelle O Barentsz; Jonathan Richenberg; Richard Clements; Peter Choyke; Sadhna Verma; Geert Villeirs; Olivier Rouviere; Vibeke Logager; Jurgen J Fütterer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  6 in total

1.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging versus Partin tables and the Memorial Sloan-Kettering cancer center nomogram in risk stratification of patients with prostate cancer referred to external beam radiation therapy.

Authors:  Rossano Girometti; Martina Pancot; Marco Andrea Signor; Martina Urbani; Luca Balestreri; Chiara Zuiani
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2018-05-12       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Quantitative characterisation of clinically significant intra-prostatic cancer by prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression and cell density on PSMA-11.

Authors:  Liran Domachevsky; Natalia Goldberg; Hanna Bernstine; Meital Nidam; David Groshar
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Multiparametric MRI Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Accuracy in Diagnosing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Pietro Pepe; Davide D'Urso; Antonio Garufi; Giandomenico Priolo; Michele Pennisi; Giorgio Russo; Maria Gabriella Sabini; Lucia Maria Valastro; Antonio Galia; Filippo Fraggetta
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2017 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 4.  [Imaging of locally advanced prostate cancer : Importance of ultrasound and especially MRI].

Authors:  O Solyanik; B Schlenker; C Gratzke; B Ertl-Wagner; D A Clevert; C Stief; J Ricke; D Nörenberg
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 5.  The Use of Quantitative Imaging in Radiation Oncology: A Quantitative Imaging Network (QIN) Perspective.

Authors:  Robert H Press; Hui-Kuo G Shu; Hyunsuk Shim; James M Mountz; Brenda F Kurland; Richard L Wahl; Ella F Jones; Nola M Hylton; Elizabeth R Gerstner; Robert J Nordstrom; Lori Henderson; Karen A Kurdziel; Bhadrasain Vikram; Michael A Jacobs; Matthias Holdhoff; Edward Taylor; David A Jaffray; Lawrence H Schwartz; David A Mankoff; Paul E Kinahan; Hannah M Linden; Philippe Lambin; Thomas J Dilling; Daniel L Rubin; Lubomir Hadjiiski; John M Buatti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Combining the Tumor Contact Length and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Better Predicts Extraprostatic Extension of Prostate Cancer with Capsular Abutment: A 3 Tesla MR Imaging Study.

Authors:  Koichi Ito; Emiko Chiba; Noriko Oyama-Manabe; Satoshi Washino; Osamu Manabe; Tomoaki Miyagawa; Kohei Hamamoto; Masahiro Hiruta; Keisuke Tanno; Hiroshi Shinmoto
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 2.760

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.