Literature DB >> 21159879

Serotype-specific inactivation of the cellular DNA damage response during adenovirus infection.

Natalie A Forrester1, Garry G Sedgwick, Anoushka Thomas, Andrew N Blackford, Thomas Speiseder, Thomas Dobner, Philip J Byrd, Grant S Stewart, Andrew S Turnell, Roger J A Grand.   

Abstract

Adenovirus type 5 (Ad5) inactivates the host cell DNA damage response by facilitating the degradation of Mre11, DNA ligase IV, and p53. In the case of p53, this is achieved through polyubiquitylation by Ad5E1B55K and Ad5E4orf6, which recruit a Cul5-based E3 ubiquitin ligase. Recent evidence indicates that this paradigm does not apply to other adenovirus serotypes, since Ad12, but not Ad5, causes the degradation of TOPBP1 through the action of E4orf6 alone and a Cul2-based E3 ubiquitin ligase. We now have extended these studies to adenovirus groups A to E. While infection by Ad4, Ad5, and Ad12 (groups E, C, and A, respectively) cause the degradation of Mre11, DNA ligase IV, and p53, infection with Ad3, Ad7, Ad9, and Ad11 (groups B1, B1, D, and B2, respectively) only affects DNA ligase IV levels. Indeed, Ad3, Ad7, and Ad11 cause the marked accumulation of p53. Despite this, MDM2 levels were very low following infection with all of the viruses examined here, regardless of whether they increase p53 expression. In addition, we found that only Ad12 causes the degradation of TOPBP1, and, like Ad5, Ad4 recruits a Cul5-based E3 ubiquitin ligase to degrade p53. Surprisingly, Mre11 and DNA ligase IV degradation do not appear to be significantly affected in Ad4-, Ad5-, or Ad12-infected cells depleted of Cul2 or Cul5, indicating that E1B55K and E4orf6 recruit multiple ubiquitin ligases to target cellular proteins. Finally, although Mre11 is not degraded by Ad3, Ad7, Ad9, and Ad11, no viral DNA concatemers could be detected. We suggest that group B and D adenoviruses have evolved mechanisms based on the loss of DNA ligase IV and perhaps other unknown molecules to disable the host cell DNA damage response to promote viral replication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21159879      PMCID: PMC3067775          DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01748-10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Virol        ISSN: 0022-538X            Impact factor:   5.103


  53 in total

1.  Proteasome-dependent degradation of Daxx by the viral E1B-55K protein in human adenovirus-infected cells.

Authors:  Sabrina Schreiner; Peter Wimmer; Hüseyin Sirma; Roger D Everett; Paola Blanchette; Peter Groitl; Thomas Dobner
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 2.  Adenovirus E1B 55-kilodalton protein: multiple roles in viral infection and cell transformation.

Authors:  Andrew N Blackford; Roger J A Grand
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 5.103

3.  Distinct requirements of adenovirus E1b55K protein for degradation of cellular substrates.

Authors:  Rachel A Schwartz; Seema S Lakdawala; Heather D Eshleman; Matthew R Russell; Christian T Carson; Matthew D Weitzman
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 5.103

4.  Identification of integrin alpha3 as a new substrate of the adenovirus E4orf6/E1B 55-kilodalton E3 ubiquitin ligase complex.

Authors:  Frédéric Dallaire; Paola Blanchette; Peter Groitl; Thomas Dobner; Philip E Branton
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  Relocalization of the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex by the adenovirus E4 ORF3 protein is required for viral replication.

Authors:  Jared D Evans; Patrick Hearing
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.103

6.  Adenovirus type 5 E4orf3 protein targets the Mre11 complex to cytoplasmic aggresomes.

Authors:  Felipe D Araujo; Travis H Stracker; Christian T Carson; Darwin V Lee; Matthew D Weitzman
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.103

7.  E1B 55k-independent dissociation of the DNA ligase IV/XRCC4 complex by E4 34k during adenovirus infection.

Authors:  Sumithra Jayaram; Timra Gilson; Elana S Ehrlich; Xiao-Fang Yu; Gary Ketner; Les Hanakahi
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 3.616

8.  Differential requirements of the C terminus of Nbs1 in suppressing adenovirus DNA replication and promoting concatemer formation.

Authors:  Seema S Lakdawala; Rachel A Schwartz; Kevin Ferenchak; Christian T Carson; Brian P McSharry; Gavin W Wilkinson; Matthew D Weitzman
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 5.103

9.  The quest for human cancer viruses.

Authors:  J J TRENTIN; Y YABE; G TAYLOR
Journal:  Science       Date:  1962-09-14       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Mislocalization of the MRN complex prevents ATR signaling during adenovirus infection.

Authors:  Christian T Carson; Nicole I Orazio; Darwin V Lee; Junghae Suh; Simon Bekker-Jensen; Felipe D Araujo; Seema S Lakdawala; Caroline E Lilley; Jiri Bartek; Jiri Lukas; Matthew D Weitzman
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  41 in total

1.  Viral and Cellular Genomes Activate Distinct DNA Damage Responses.

Authors:  Govind A Shah; Clodagh C O'Shea
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Analysis of the Cullin binding sites of the E4orf6 proteins of human adenovirus E3 ubiquitin ligases.

Authors:  Timra Gilson; Chi Ying Cheng; Woosuk Steve Hur; Paola Blanchette; Philip E Branton
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 5.103

3.  Adenovirus Core Protein VII Downregulates the DNA Damage Response on the Host Genome.

Authors:  Daphne C Avgousti; Ashley N Della Fera; Clayton J Otter; Christin Herrmann; Neha J Pancholi; Matthew D Weitzman
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 5.103

4.  Role of E1B55K in E4orf6/E1B55K E3 ligase complexes formed by different human adenovirus serotypes.

Authors:  Chi Ying Cheng; Timra Gilson; Peter Wimmer; Sabrina Schreiner; Gary Ketner; Thomas Dobner; Philip E Branton; Paola Blanchette
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  Downregulation of Mdm2 and Mdm4 enhances viral gene expression during adenovirus infection.

Authors:  Heng Yang; Zhi Zheng; Lisa Y Zhao; Qiang Li; Daiqing Liao
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 4.534

6.  Adenovirus E4orf3 targets transcriptional intermediary factor 1γ for proteasome-dependent degradation during infection.

Authors:  Natalie A Forrester; Rakesh N Patel; Thomas Speiseder; Peter Groitl; Garry G Sedgwick; Neil J Shimwell; Robert I Seed; Pól Ó Catnaigh; Christopher J McCabe; Grant S Stewart; Thomas Dobner; Roger J A Grand; Ashley Martin; Andrew S Turnell
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 7.  Adenoviral strategies to overcome innate cellular responses to infection.

Authors:  Sook-Young Sohn; Patrick Hearing
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 4.124

8.  Serotype-specific restriction of wild-type adenoviruses by the cellular Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex.

Authors:  Neha J Pancholi; Matthew D Weitzman
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.616

9.  Localization of the kinase Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated to Adenovirus E4 mutant DNA replication centers is important for its inhibitory effect on viral DNA accumulation.

Authors:  Dipendra Gautam; Gabrielle Stanley; Mary Owen; Eileen Bridge
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 3.616

10.  Adenovirus E4-ORF3 Targets PIAS3 and Together with E1B-55K Remodels SUMO Interactions in the Nucleus and at Virus Genome Replication Domains.

Authors:  Jennifer M Higginbotham; Clodagh C O'Shea
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 5.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.