PURPOSE: Genomic complexity is present in approximately 15% to 30% of all chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and has emerged as a strong independent predictor of rapid disease progression and short remission duration in CLL. We conducted this study to advance our understanding of the causes of genomic complexity in CLL. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We have obtained quantitative measurements of radiation-induced apoptosis and radiation-induced ATM autophosphorylation in purified CLL cells from 158 and 140 patients, respectively, and have used multivariate analysis to identify independent contributions of various biological variables on genomic complexity in CLL. RESULTS: Here, we identify a strong independent effect of radiation resistance on elevated genomic complexity in CLL and describe radiation resistance as a predictor for shortened CLL survival. Furthermore, using multivariate analysis, we identify del17p/p53 aberrations, del11q, del13q14 type II (invariably resulting in Rb loss), and CD38 expression as independent predictors of genomic complexity in CLL, with aberrant p53 as a predictor of approximately 50% of genomic complexity in CLL. Focusing on del11q, we determined that normalized ATM activity was a modest predictor of genomic complexity but was not independent of del11q. Through single nucleotide polymorphism array-based fine mapping of del11q, we identified frequent monoallelic loss of Mre11 and H2AFX in addition to ATM, indicative of compound del11q-resident gene defects in the DNA double-strand break response. CONCLUSIONS: Our quantitative analysis links multiple molecular defects, including for the first time del11q and large 13q14 deletions (type II), to elevated genomic complexity in CLL, thereby suggesting mechanisms for the observed clinical aggressiveness of CLL in patients with unstable genomes.
PURPOSE: Genomic complexity is present in approximately 15% to 30% of all chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and has emerged as a strong independent predictor of rapid disease progression and short remission duration in CLL. We conducted this study to advance our understanding of the causes of genomic complexity in CLL. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We have obtained quantitative measurements of radiation-induced apoptosis and radiation-induced ATM autophosphorylation in purified CLL cells from 158 and 140 patients, respectively, and have used multivariate analysis to identify independent contributions of various biological variables on genomic complexity in CLL. RESULTS: Here, we identify a strong independent effect of radiation resistance on elevated genomic complexity in CLL and describe radiation resistance as a predictor for shortened CLL survival. Furthermore, using multivariate analysis, we identify del17p/p53 aberrations, del11q, del13q14 type II (invariably resulting in Rb loss), and CD38 expression as independent predictors of genomic complexity in CLL, with aberrant p53 as a predictor of approximately 50% of genomic complexity in CLL. Focusing on del11q, we determined that normalized ATM activity was a modest predictor of genomic complexity but was not independent of del11q. Through single nucleotide polymorphism array-based fine mapping of del11q, we identified frequent monoallelic loss of Mre11 and H2AFX in addition to ATM, indicative of compound del11q-resident gene defects in the DNA double-strand break response. CONCLUSIONS: Our quantitative analysis links multiple molecular defects, including for the first time del11q and large 13q14 deletions (type II), to elevated genomic complexity in CLL, thereby suggesting mechanisms for the observed clinical aggressiveness of CLL in patients with unstable genomes.
Authors: Christine Mayr; Michael R Speicher; David M Kofler; Raymund Buhmann; John Strehl; Raymonde Busch; Michael Hallek; Clemens-Martin Wendtner Journal: Blood Date: 2005-09-22 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: A Carter; K Lin; P D Sherrington; M Atherton; K Pearson; A Douglas; A Burford; V Brito-Babapulle; E Matutes; D Catovsky; A R Pettitt Journal: Leukemia Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Thorsten Zenz; Alexander Kröber; Katrin Scherer; Sonja Häbe; Andreas Bühler; Axel Benner; Tina Denzel; Dirk Winkler; Jennifer Edelmann; Carsten Schwänen; Hartmut Döhner; Stephan Stilgenbauer Journal: Blood Date: 2008-08-08 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Belinda Austen; Judith E Powell; Azra Alvi; Ian Edwards; Laura Hooper; Jane Starczynski; A Malcolm R Taylor; Christopher Fegan; Paul Moss; Tatjana Stankovic Journal: Blood Date: 2005-07-12 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: R N Damle; T Wasil; F Fais; F Ghiotto; A Valetto; S L Allen; A Buchbinder; D Budman; K Dittmar; J Kolitz; S M Lichtman; P Schulman; V P Vinciguerra; K R Rai; M Ferrarini; N Chiorazzi Journal: Blood Date: 1999-09-15 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Tait D Shanafelt; Thomas E Witzig; Stephanie R Fink; Robert B Jenkins; Sarah F Paternoster; Stephanie A Smoley; Kimberly J Stockero; Danielle M Nast; Heather C Flynn; Renee C Tschumper; Susan Geyer; Clive S Zent; Tim G Call; Diane F Jelinek; Neil E Kay; Gordon W Dewald Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-10-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Gareth L Bond; Wenwei Hu; Elisabeth E Bond; Harlan Robins; Stuart G Lutzker; Nicoleta C Arva; Jill Bargonetti; Frank Bartel; Helge Taubert; Peter Wuerl; Kenan Onel; Linwah Yip; Shih-Jen Hwang; Louise C Strong; Guillermina Lozano; Arnold J Levine Journal: Cell Date: 2004-11-24 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Azra J Alvi; Belinda Austen; Victoria J Weston; Christopher Fegan; David MacCallum; Athos Gianella-Borradori; David P Lane; Mike Hubank; Judith E Powell; Wenbin Wei; A Malcolm R Taylor; Paul A H Moss; Tatjana Stankovic Journal: Blood Date: 2005-02-03 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Jennifer R Brown; Megan Hanna; Bethany Tesar; Lillian Werner; Nathalie Pochet; John M Asara; Yaoyu E Wang; Paola Dal Cin; Stacey M Fernandes; Christina Thompson; Laura Macconaill; Catherine J Wu; Yves Van de Peer; Mick Correll; Aviv Regev; Donna Neuberg; Arnold S Freedman Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-05-23 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Matthew J J Rose-Zerilli; Jade Forster; Helen Parker; Anton Parker; Ana E Rodríguez; Tracy Chaplin; Anne Gardiner; Andrew J Steele; Andrew Collins; Bryan D Young; Anna Skowronska; Daniel Catovsky; Tatjana Stankovic; David G Oscier; Jonathan C Strefford Journal: Haematologica Date: 2014-02-28 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: Preetesh Jain; Michael Keating; Phillip A Thompson; Long Trinh; Xuemei Wang; William Wierda; Alessandra Ferrajoli; Jan Burger; Hagop Kantarjian; Zeev Estrov; Lynne Abruzzo; Susan O'Brien Journal: Am J Hematol Date: 2015-03-30 Impact factor: 10.047
Authors: Veronika Navrkalova; Ludmila Sebejova; Jana Zemanova; Jana Kminkova; Blanka Kubesova; Jitka Malcikova; Marek Mraz; Jana Smardova; Sarka Pavlova; Michael Doubek; Yvona Brychtova; David Potesil; Veronika Nemethova; Jiri Mayer; Sarka Pospisilova; Martin Trbusek Journal: Haematologica Date: 2013-04-12 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: Larissa Lezina; Ruth V Spriggs; Daniel Beck; Carolyn Jones; Kate M Dudek; Aleksandra Bzura; George D D Jones; Graham Packham; Anne E Willis; Simon D Wagner Journal: Blood Adv Date: 2018-08-14