Robert Mechera1, Salome Dell-Kuster2,3, Marco von Strauss Und Torney2,4, Igor Langer5,6, Markus Furrer7, Heiner C Bucher3, Rachel Rosenthal2. 1. Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland. Robert.Mechera@usb.ch. 2. Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland. 3. Basel Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University Hospital of Basel, Spitalstrasse 12, 4031, Basel, Switzerland. 4. Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Tellstrasse 25, 5001, Aarau, Switzerland. 5. Department of Surgery, Lindenhof Hospital Bern, Bremgartenstrassse 117, 3012, Bern, Switzerland. 6. Swiss Association for Quality Assurance in Surgery (AQC), Birmensdorferstrasse 470, 8055, Zurich, Switzerland. 7. Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Graubünden, Loëstrasse 170, 7000, Chur, Switzerland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tutorial assistance is related to extra time and cost, and the hospitals' financial compensation for this activity is under debate. We therefore aimed at quantifying the extra time and resulting cost required to train one surgical resident in the operating theatre for board certification in Switzerland as an example of a training curriculum involving several surgical subspecialties. Additionally, we intended to quantify the percentage of tutorial assistance. METHODS: We analysed 200,700 operations carried out between 2008 and 2012. Median duration of procedure categories was calculated according to four different seniority levels. The extra time if the procedure was performed by residents, and resulting cost were analysed. The percentage of procedures carried out by residents as compared to more experienced surgeons was assessed over time. RESULTS: On average, residents performed about a third of all operations including typical teaching procedures like appendectomies. An increase in duration and cost of well-defined procedures categories, e.g. cholecystectomies was demonstrated if a resident performed the procedure. In less well-defined categories, residents seemed to perform less difficult procedures than senior consultants resulting in shorter durations of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The financial impact of tutorial assistance is important, and solutions need to be found to compensate for this activity. The low percentage of procedures performed by trainees may make it difficult to fulfil requirements for board certification within a reasonable period of time. This should be addressed within the training curriculum.
BACKGROUND: Tutorial assistance is related to extra time and cost, and the hospitals' financial compensation for this activity is under debate. We therefore aimed at quantifying the extra time and resulting cost required to train one surgical resident in the operating theatre for board certification in Switzerland as an example of a training curriculum involving several surgical subspecialties. Additionally, we intended to quantify the percentage of tutorial assistance. METHODS: We analysed 200,700 operations carried out between 2008 and 2012. Median duration of procedure categories was calculated according to four different seniority levels. The extra time if the procedure was performed by residents, and resulting cost were analysed. The percentage of procedures carried out by residents as compared to more experienced surgeons was assessed over time. RESULTS: On average, residents performed about a third of all operations including typical teaching procedures like appendectomies. An increase in duration and cost of well-defined procedures categories, e.g. cholecystectomies was demonstrated if a resident performed the procedure. In less well-defined categories, residents seemed to perform less difficult procedures than senior consultants resulting in shorter durations of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The financial impact of tutorial assistance is important, and solutions need to be found to compensate for this activity. The low percentage of procedures performed by trainees may make it difficult to fulfil requirements for board certification within a reasonable period of time. This should be addressed within the training curriculum.
Authors: David T Harrington; G D Roye; Beth A Ryder; Thomas J Miner; Pamela Richardson; William G Cioffi Journal: J Surg Educ Date: 2007 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.891
Authors: Timothy J Babineau; James Becker; Gary Gibbons; Stephen Sentovich; Donald Hess; Sharon Robertson; Michael Stone Journal: Arch Surg Date: 2004-04
Authors: Raoul A Droeser; Salome Dell-Kuster; Anita Kurmann; Rachel Rosenthal; Markus Zuber; Jürg Metzger; Daniel Oertli; Christian T Hamel; Daniel M Frey Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Christine S Hwang; Christina R Pagano; Keith A Wichterman; Gary L Dunnington; Edward J Alfrey Journal: Surgery Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Marco von Strauss Und Torney; Sohelia Aghlmandi; Jasmin Zeindler; Debora Nowakowski; Christian A Nebiker; Christoph Kettelhack; Rachel Rosenthal; Raoul A Droeser; Savas D Soysal; Henry Hoffmann; Robert Mechera Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2018-05-21 Impact factor: 4.584