Literature DB >> 18062555

The influence of information redundancy on probabilistic inferences.

Ania Dieckmann1, Jörg Rieskamp.   

Abstract

Information redundancy affects the accuracy of inference strategies. A simulation study illustrates that under high-information redundancy simple heuristics that rely on only the most important information are as accurate as strategies that integrate all available information, whereas under low redundancy integrating information becomes advantageous. Assuming that people exercise adaptive strategy selection, it is predicted that their inferences will more often be captured by simple heuristics that focus on part of the available information insituations ofhigh-information redundancy, especially when information search is costly. This prediction is confirmed in two experiments. The participants' task was to repeatedly infer which of two alternatives, described by several cues, had a higher criterion value. In the first experiment, simple heuristics predicted the inference process better under high-information redundancy than under low-information redundancy. In the second experiment, this result could be generalized to an inference situation in which participants had no prior opportunity to learn about the strategies' accuracies through outcome feedback. The results demonstrate that people are able to respond adaptively to different decision environments under various learning opportunities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18062555     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  19 in total

1.  Take the best or look at the rest? Factors influencing "one-reason" decision making.

Authors:  Ben R Newell; David R Shanks
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Take the best versus simultaneous feature matching: probabilistic inferences from memory and effects of representation format.

Authors:  Arndt Bröder; Stefanie Schiffer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2003-06

3.  Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology.

Authors:  E BRUNSWIK
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1955-05       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Evidence accumulation in decision making: unifying the "take the best" and the "rational" models.

Authors:  Michael D Lee; Tarrant D R Cummins
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-04

Review 5.  The role of representative design in an ecological approach to cognition.

Authors:  Mandeep K Dhami; Ralph Hertwig; Ulrich Hoffrage
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  A response-time approach to comparing generalized rational and take-the-best models of decision making.

Authors:  F Bryan Bergert; Robert M Nosofsky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Reasoning the fast and frugal way: models of bounded rationality.

Authors:  G Gigerenzer; D G Goldstein
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Assessing the empirical validity of the "take-the-best" heuristic as a model of human probabilistic inference.

Authors:  A Bröder
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  SSL: a theory of how people learn to select strategies.

Authors:  Jörg Rieskamp; Philipp E Otto
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2006-05

10.  Inferences under time pressure: how opportunity costs affect strategy selection.

Authors:  Jörg Rieskamp; Ulrich Hoffrage
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2007-07-20
View more
  7 in total

1.  Take-the-best in expert-novice decision strategies for residential burglary.

Authors:  Rocio Garcia-Retamero; Mandeep K Dhami
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

2.  Fast and effective: Intuitive processes in complex decisions.

Authors:  Michael Brusovansky; Moshe Glickman; Marius Usher
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-08

3.  Information sampling behavior with explicit sampling costs.

Authors:  Mordechai Z Juni; Todd M Gureckis; Laurence T Maloney
Journal:  Decision (Wash D C )       Date:  2016-07

4.  Neural correlates of informational cascades: brain mechanisms of social influence on belief updating.

Authors:  Rafael E Huber; Vasily Klucharev; Jörg Rieskamp
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Ecological rationality: a framework for understanding and aiding the aging decision maker.

Authors:  Rui Mata; Thorsten Pachur; Bettina von Helversen; Ralph Hertwig; Jörg Rieskamp; Lael Schooler
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  A Generative View of Rationality and Growing Awareness.

Authors:  Teppo Felin; Jan Koenderink
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-07

Review 7.  Good judgments do not require complex cognition.

Authors:  Julian N Marewski; Wolfgang Gaissmaier; Gerd Gigerenzer
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2009-09-27
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.