Literature DB >> 16719651

SSL: a theory of how people learn to select strategies.

Jörg Rieskamp1, Philipp E Otto.   

Abstract

The assumption that people possess a repertoire of strategies to solve the inference problems they face has been raised repeatedly. However, a computational model specifying how people select strategies from their repertoire is still lacking. The proposed strategy selection learning (SSL) theory predicts a strategy selection process on the basis of reinforcement learning. The theory assumes that individuals develop subjective expectations for the strategies they have and select strategies proportional to their expectations, which are then updated on the basis of subsequent experience. The learning assumption was supported in 4 experimental studies. Participants substantially improved their inferences through feedback. In all 4 studies, the best-performing strategy from the participants' repertoires most accurately predicted the inferences after sufficient learning opportunities. When testing SSL against 3 models representing extensions of SSL and against an exemplar model assuming a memory-based inference process, the authors found that SSL predicted the inferences most accurately. 2006 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16719651     DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.135.2.207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  54 in total

1.  Strategy switch costs in arithmetic problem solving.

Authors:  Patrick Lemaire; Mireille Lecacheur
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-04

2.  From recognition to decisions: extending and testing recognition-based models for multialternative inference.

Authors:  Julian N Marewski; Wolfgang Gaissmaier; Lael J Schooler; Daniel G Goldstein; Gerd Gigerenzer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-06

3.  Age-related differences in sequential modulations of problem-size and rule-violation effects during arithmetic problem verification tasks.

Authors:  Patrick Lemaire; Fleur Brun
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-04

4.  Value-based attentional capture affects multi-alternative decision making.

Authors:  Sebastian Gluth; Mikhail S Spektor; Jörg Rieskamp
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Take-the-best in expert-novice decision strategies for residential burglary.

Authors:  Rocio Garcia-Retamero; Mandeep K Dhami
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

6.  The influence of training and experience on memory strategy.

Authors:  John Patrick; Phillip L Morgan; Victoria Smy; Leyanne Tiley; Helen Seeby; Tanya Patrick; Jonathan Evans
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-07

7.  Empirical content as a criterion for evaluating models.

Authors:  Marc Jekel
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2019-03-20

8.  A unifying computational model of decision making.

Authors:  Alexandra Kirsch
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2019-01-30

9.  The time course of strategy sequential difficulty effects: an ERP study in arithmetic.

Authors:  Kim Uittenhove; Celine Poletti; Stephane Dufau; Patrick Lemaire
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 10.  Good judgments do not require complex cognition.

Authors:  Julian N Marewski; Wolfgang Gaissmaier; Gerd Gigerenzer
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2009-09-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.