Literature DB >> 17640605

Inferences under time pressure: how opportunity costs affect strategy selection.

Jörg Rieskamp1, Ulrich Hoffrage.   

Abstract

Do the inference strategies people select depend on the magnitude of time pressure? Is this dependency modified by the type of time pressure? These questions are addressed in three experimental studies in which participants made inferences after having searched for information on a computerized information board. In Study 1, time pressure was induced indirectly by imposing opportunity costs of being slow, a form of time pressure that is common in daily life but that has rarely been examined in the literature. A simple lexicographic heuristic (LEX) achieved the best fit in predicting participants' inferences. Studies 2 and 3 induced high time pressure either indirectly by imposing opportunity costs in terms of time or directly by limiting the time for each choice. Regardless of how time pressure was induced, under high time pressure the inferences could be best predicted with LEX, whereas under low time pressure a weighted linear model that integrates all available information predicted the inferences best. We conclude that people select strategies adaptively depending on characteristics of the situation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17640605     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  27 in total

1.  Take-the-best in expert-novice decision strategies for residential burglary.

Authors:  Rocio Garcia-Retamero; Mandeep K Dhami
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

2.  Whatever the cost? Information integration in memory-based inferences depends on cognitive effort.

Authors:  Benjamin E Hilbig; Martha Michalkiewicz; Marta Castela; Rüdiger F Pohl; Edgar Erdfelder
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-05

3.  Decision-Making Processes in Social Contexts.

Authors:  Elizabeth Bruch; Fred Feinberg
Journal:  Annu Rev Sociol       Date:  2017-05-12

4.  A conceptual model for generating and validating in-session clinical judgments.

Authors:  Sofia B Jacinto; Cara C Lewis; João N Braga; Kelli Scott
Journal:  Psychother Res       Date:  2016-04-18

5.  On the suitability of fast and frugal heuristics for designing values clarification methods in patient decision aids: a critical analysis.

Authors:  Arwen H Pieterse; Marieke de Vries
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Is Cognitive Impairment Related to Violations of Rationality? A Laboratory Alcohol Intoxication Study Testing Transitivity of Preference.

Authors:  Clintin P Davis-Stober; Denis M McCarthy; Daniel R Cavagnaro; Mason Price; Nicholas Brown; Sanghyuk Park
Journal:  Decision (Wash D C )       Date:  2018-07-23

7.  Clinical reasoning in the real world is mediated by bounded rationality: implications for diagnostic clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Ana Paula Ribeiro Bonilauri Ferreira; Rodrigo Fernando Ferreira; Dimple Rajgor; Jatin Shah; Andrea Menezes; Ricardo Pietrobon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The influence of information redundancy on probabilistic inferences.

Authors:  Ania Dieckmann; Jörg Rieskamp
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-10

9.  A comparison of representations for discrete multi-criteria decision problems.

Authors:  Johannes Gettinger; Elmar Kiesling; Christian Stummer; Rudolf Vetschera
Journal:  Decis Support Syst       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 5.795

Review 10.  Good judgments do not require complex cognition.

Authors:  Julian N Marewski; Wolfgang Gaissmaier; Gerd Gigerenzer
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2009-09-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.