Literature DB >> 18062544

Memory for scenes: refixations reflect retrieval.

Linus Holm1, Timo Mäntylä.   

Abstract

Most conceptions of episodic memory hold that reinstatement of encoding operations is essential for retrieval success, but the specific mechanisms of retrieval reinstatement are not well understood. In three experiments, we used saccadic eye movements as a window for examining reinstatement in scene recognition. In Experiment 1, participants viewed complex scenes, while number of study fixations was controlled by using a gaze-contingent paradigm. In Experiment 2, effects of stimulus saliency were minimized by directing participants' eye movements during study. At test, participants made remember/know judgments for each recognized stimulus scene. Both experiments showed that remember responses were associated with more consistent study-test fixations than false rejections (Experiments 1 and 2) and know responses (Experiment 2). In Experiment 3, we examined the causal role of gaze consistency on retrieval by manipulating participants' expectations during recognition. After studying name and scene pairs, each test scene was preceded by the same or different name as during study. Participants made more consistent eye movements following a matching, rather than mismatching, scene name. Taken together, these findings suggest that explicit recollection is a function of perceptual reconstruction and that event memory influences gaze control in this active reconstruction process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18062544     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193500

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  42 in total

1.  Reactivation of motor brain areas during explicit memory for actions.

Authors:  L Nyberg; K M Petersson; L G Nilsson; J Sandblom; C Aberg; M Ingvar
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Reactivation of encoding-related brain activity during memory retrieval.

Authors:  L Nyberg; R Habib; A R McIntosh; E Tulving
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Associative knowledge controls deployment of visual selective attention.

Authors:  Elisabeth Moores; Liana Laiti; Leonardo Chelazzi
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Top-down facilitation of visual recognition.

Authors:  M Bar; K S Kassam; A S Ghuman; J Boshyan; A M Schmid; A M Schmidt; A M Dale; M S Hämäläinen; K Marinkovic; D L Schacter; B R Rosen; E Halgren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-03       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Fixation patterns made during brief examination of two-dimensional images.

Authors:  S K Mannan; K H Ruddock; D S Wooding
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Eye movement strategies involved in face perception.

Authors:  G J Walker-Smith; A G Gale; J M Findlay
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Memory representations underlying motor commands used during manipulation of common and novel objects.

Authors:  A M Gordon; G Westling; K J Cole; R S Johansson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Scene consistency in object and background perception.

Authors:  Jodi L Davenport; Mary C Potter
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-08

10.  Constructing visual representations of natural scenes: the roles of short- and long-term visual memory.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  16 in total

1.  Do object refixations during scene viewing indicate rehearsal in visual working memory?

Authors:  Gregory J Zelinsky; Lester C Loschky; Christopher A Dickinson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-05

2.  Reinstatement of individual past events revealed by the similarity of distributed activation patterns during encoding and retrieval.

Authors:  Erik A Wing; Maureen Ritchey; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Hippocampal contribution to implicit configuration memory expressed via eye movements during scene exploration.

Authors:  Anthony J Ryals; Jane X Wang; Kelly L Polnaszek; Joel L Voss
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 3.899

4.  The spatial distribution of attention predicts familiarity strength during encoding and retrieval.

Authors:  Michelle M Ramey; John M Henderson; Andrew P Yonelinas
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2020-04-06

5.  Uncertainty in learning, choice, and visual fixation.

Authors:  Hrvoje Stojić; Jacob L Orquin; Peter Dayan; Raymond J Dolan; Maarten Speekenbrink
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Eye movements support behavioral pattern completion.

Authors:  Jordana S Wynn; Jennifer D Ryan; Bradley R Buchsbaum
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Listen up, eye movements play a role in verbal memory retrieval.

Authors:  Agnes Scholz; Katja Mehlhorn; Josef F Krems
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-12-20

8.  Attention deployment during memorizing and executing complex instructions.

Authors:  Jens K Apel; Gavin F Revie; Angelo Cangelosi; Rob Ellis; Jeremy Goslin; Martin H Fischer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-13       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Memory after visual search: Overlapping phonology, shared meaning, and bilingual experience influence what we remember.

Authors:  Viorica Marian; Sayuri Hayakawa; Scott R Schroeder
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2021-08-28       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  Tracking down the path of memory: eye scanpaths facilitate retrieval of visuospatial information.

Authors:  Agata Bochynska; Bruno Laeng
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.