Literature DB >> 18060681

Prognostic significance of Gleason score discrepancies between needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy.

Michael Müntener1, Jonathan I Epstein, David J Hernandez, Mark L Gonzalgo, Leslie Mangold, Elizabeth Humphreys, Patrick C Walsh, Alan W Partin, Matthew E Nielsen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Discordance between the Gleason score (GS) on needle biopsy (NB) and the GS of the radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen is a common finding. The objective of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of these discrepancies with respect to outcomes following RP.
METHODS: In the study, 6625 men treated by RP were categorized as having NB=RP (68.8%), NB<RP (25.0%) or NB>RP (6.2%) GS, and stratified for analyses into RP GS groups. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze differences in biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS), and multivariate Cox analyses were performed to estimate the independent relative risk of progression associated with GS discrepancies.
RESULTS: Across multiple RP GS strata (3+4, 7, 8, 8-10), patients with a lower NB GS experienced significantly better BRFS than patients with equal NB and RP GS (all p<0.05). NB<RP GS was independently associated with better (pooled HR, 0.76, p=0.001) BRFS, within and across RP GS strata. Similarly, patients with NB>RP GS had poorer BRFS than patients with NB=RP GS across multiple RP GS strata (< or =3+3, 3+4, 7; all p<0.05). NB>RP GS was independently associated with worse (pooled HR, 1.91, p<0.001) BRFS probabilities, within and across RP GS strata.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the GS of the NB adds additional prognostic value to the RP GS in a consistent manner that may be applicable to strategies of risk stratification and patient counseling after surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18060681     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.11.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  21 in total

1.  The influence of expertise of the surgical pathologist to undergrading, upgrading, and understaging of prostate cancer in patients undergoing subsequent radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Attila Majoros; Attila Marcell Szász; Péter Nyirády; Eszter Székely; Péter Riesz; Attila Szendrői; Attila Keszthelyi; Janina Kulka; Imre Romics
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Immunohistochemical expression of BRCA1 and lethal prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michelangelo Fiorentino; Gregory Judson; Kathryn Penney; Richard Flavin; Jennifer Stark; Christopher Fiore; Katja Fall; Neil Martin; Jing Ma; Jennifer Sinnott; Edward Giovannucci; Meir Stampfer; Howard D Sesso; Philip W Kantoff; Stephen Finn; Massimo Loda; Lorelei Mucci
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 3.  Correlation between Gleason Scores in Needle Biopsy and Corresponding Radical Prostatectomy Specimens: A Twelve-Year Review.

Authors:  Maliheh Khoddami; Yassaman Khademi; Maryam Kazemi Aghdam; Haleh Soltanghoraee
Journal:  Iran J Pathol       Date:  2016

4.  Preoperative low serum testosterone is associated with high-grade prostate cancer and an increased Gleason score upgrading.

Authors:  A Pichon; Y Neuzillet; H Botto; J-P Raynaud; C Radulescu; V Molinié; J-M Herve; T Lebret
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 5.554

5.  Association between percentage of tumor involvement and Gleason score upgrading in low-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Qiang Fu; Judd W Moul; Lionel L Bañez; Leon Sun; Vladimir Mouraviev; Dongha Xie; Thomas J Polascik
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 3.064

6.  The EGFR polymorphism rs884419 is associated with freedom from recurrence in patients with resected prostate cancer.

Authors:  Carmen A Perez; Heidi Chen; Yu Shyr; Regina Courtney; Wei Zheng; Qiuyin Cai; Misun Hwang; Jerry Jaboin; Stephen Schleicher; Luigi Moretti; Marcia Wills; Joseph A Smith; Bo Lu
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 7.  Guidance on patient consultation. Current evidence for prostate-specific antigen screening in healthy men and treatment options for men with proven localised prostate cancer.

Authors:  Giovannalberto Pini; Justin Collins; Pirus Ghadjar; Peter Wiklund
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.092

8.  The Significance of Accurate Determination of Gleason Score for Therapeutic Options and Prognosis of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Burkhard Helpap; Daniel Ringli; Jens Tonhauser; Immanuel Poser; Jürgen Breul; Heidrun Gevensleben; Hans-Helge Seifert
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 3.201

9.  Tissue-based biomarkers in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Timothy N Clinton; Aditya Bagrodia; Yair Lotan; Vitaly Margulis; Ganesh V Raj; Solomon L Woldu
Journal:  Expert Rev Precis Med Drug Dev       Date:  2017-09-05

10.  Predicting Prostate Cancer Upgrading of Biopsy Gleason Grade Group at Radical Prostatectomy Using Machine Learning-Assisted Decision-Support Models.

Authors:  Hailang Liu; Kun Tang; Ejun Peng; Liang Wang; Ding Xia; Zhiqiang Chen
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 3.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.