Literature DB >> 18060577

Scoring system for predicting malignancy in patients diagnosed with atypical ductal hyperplasia at ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy.

Eunyoung Ko1, Wonshik Han, Jong Won Lee, Jihyoung Cho, Eun-Kyu Kim, So-Youn Jung, Mee Joo Kang, Woo Kyung Moon, In Ae Park, Sung-Won Kim, Ku Sang Kim, Eun Sook Lee, Kyu Hong Min, Seok Won Kim, Dong-Young Noh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine factors that predict under-evaluation of malignancy in patients diagnosed with atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) at ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy (CNB), and to develop a prediction algorithm for scoring the possibility of a diagnosis upgrade to malignancy based on clinical, radiological and pathological factors.
METHODS: The study enrolled patients diagnosed with ADH at ultrasound-guided CNB who subsequently underwent surgical excision of the lesion. Multivariate analysis was used to identify relevant clinical, radiological and pathological factors that may predict malignancy.
RESULTS: A total of 102 patients with ADH at CNB were identified. Of the 74 patients who underwent subsequent surgical excision, 34 (45.8%) were diagnosed with invasive or in situ malignant foci. Multivariate analysis revealed that age>50 years, microcalcification on mammography, size on imaging>15 mm and a palpable lesion were independent predictors of malignancy. Focal ADH was a negative predictor. A scoring system was developed based on logistic regression models and beta coefficients for each variable. The area under the ROC curve was 0.903 (95% CI: 0.82-0.94), and the negative predictive value was 100% for a score<or=3.5. Similar findings were observed for a validation dataset of 54 patients at other institutions.
CONCLUSIONS: A scoring system to predict malignancy in patients diagnosed with ADH at CNB was developed based on five factors: age, palpable lesion, microcalcification on mammography, size on imaging and focal ADH. This system was able to identify a subset of patients with lesions likely to be benign, indicating that imaging follow-up rather than surgical excision may be appropriate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18060577     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-007-9824-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  16 in total

1.  The risk of upgrade for atypical ductal hyperplasia detected on magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsy: a study of 100 cases from four academic institutions.

Authors:  Thaer Khoury; Zaibo Li; Souzan Sanati; Mohamed M Desouki; Xiwei Chen; Dan Wang; Song Liu; Rouzan Karabakhtsian; Prasanna Kumar; Beatriu Reig
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 5.087

2.  Prospective Analysis Using a Novel CNN Algorithm to Distinguish Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia From Ductal Carcinoma in Situ in Breast.

Authors:  Simukayi Mutasa; Peter Chang; John Nemer; Eduardo Pascual Van Sant; Mary Sun; Alison McIlvride; Maham Siddique; Richard Ha
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2020-06-07       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 3.  Upgrade rates of high-risk breast lesions diagnosed on core needle biopsy: a single-institution experience and literature review.

Authors:  Kelly L Mooney; Lawrence W Bassett; Sophia K Apple
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 7.842

4.  Accuracy of Distinguishing Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia From Ductal Carcinoma In Situ With Convolutional Neural Network-Based Machine Learning Approach Using Mammographic Image Data.

Authors:  Richard Ha; Simukayi Mutasa; Eduardo Pascual Van Sant; Jenika Karcich; Christine Chin; Michael Z Liu; Sachin Jambawalikar
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  A comparison of diagnostic performance of vacuum-assisted biopsy and core needle biopsy for breast microcalcification: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xu Chen Huang; Xu Hua Hu; Xiao Ran Wang; Chao Xi Zhou; Fei Fei Wang; Shan Yang; Gui Ying Wang
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 1.568

6.  Predictive factors for breast cancer in patients diagnosed atypical ductal hyperplasia at core needle biopsy.

Authors:  Byung Joo Chae; Ahwon Lee; Byung Joo Song; Sang Seol Jung
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 2.754

7.  Atypical ductal hyperplasia bordering on DCIS on core biopsy is associated with higher risk of upgrade than conventional atypical ductal hyperplasia.

Authors:  Kate R Pawloski; Nicole Christian; Andrea Knezevic; Hannah Y Wen; Kimberly J Van Zee; Monica Morrow; Audree B Tadros
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Vacuum assisted breast biopsy (VAB) excision of subcentimeter microcalcifications as an alternative to open biopsy for atypical ductal hyperplasia.

Authors:  Simone Schiaffino; Elena Massone; Licia Gristina; Piero Fregatti; Giuseppe Rescinito; Alessandro Villa; Daniele Friedman; Massimo Calabrese
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Diagnostic value of radiomics and machine learning with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for patients with atypical ductal hyperplasia in predicting malignant upgrade.

Authors:  Roberto Lo Gullo; Kerri Vincenti; Carolina Rossi Saccarelli; Peter Gibbs; Michael J Fox; Isaac Daimiel; Danny F Martinez; Maxine S Jochelson; Elizabeth A Morris; Jeffrey S Reiner; Katja Pinker
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 10.  High-risk lesions of the breast: concurrent diagnostic tools and management recommendations.

Authors:  Francesca Catanzariti; Daly Avendano; Giuseppe Cicero; Margarita Garza-Montemayor; Carmelo Sofia; Emmanuele Venanzi Rullo; Giorgio Ascenti; Katja Pinker-Domenig; Maria Adele Marino
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2021-05-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.