Literature DB >> 29451396

Vacuum assisted breast biopsy (VAB) excision of subcentimeter microcalcifications as an alternative to open biopsy for atypical ductal hyperplasia.

Simone Schiaffino1, Elena Massone1, Licia Gristina1, Piero Fregatti2, Giuseppe Rescinito3, Alessandro Villa4, Daniele Friedman2, Massimo Calabrese1,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) is a proliferative lesion associated with a variable increased risk of breast malignancy, but the management of the patients is still not completely defined, with mandatory surgical excision in most cases. To report the results of the conservative management with mammographic checks of patients with ADH diagnosed by vacuum assisted breast biopsy (VAB), without residual calcifications.
METHODS: The authors accessed the institutional database of radiological, surgical and pathological anatomy. Inclusion criteria were: ADH diagnosed by VAB on a single group of microcalcifications, without residual post-procedure; follow-up at least of 12 months. Exclusion criteria were the presence of personal history of breast cancer or other high-risk lesions; association with other synchronous lesions, both more and less advanced proliferative lesions.
RESULTS: The 65 included patients were all females, with age range of 40-79 years (mean 54 years). The maximum diameter range of the groups of microcalcifications was 4-11 mm (mean 6.2 mm), all classified as BI-RADS 4b (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 4b) and defined as fine pleomorphic in 29 cases (45%) or amorphous in 36 cases (55%). The range of follow-up length was 12-156 months (mean 67 months). Only one patients developed new microcalcifications, in the same breast, 48 months after and 15 mm from the first VAB, interpreted as low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) at surgical excision.
CONCLUSION: These results could justify the conservative management, in a selected group of patients, being the malignancy rate lower than 2%, considered in the literature as the "probably benign" definition. Advances in knowledge: Increasing the length of follow-up of selected patients conservatively managed can improve the management of ADH cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29451396      PMCID: PMC6190792          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20180003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  44 in total

1.  Atypical ductal hyperplasia in breast core needle biopsies. Correlation of size of the lesion, complete removal of the lesion, and the incidence of carcinoma in follow-up biopsies.

Authors:  A A Renshaw; N Cartagena; R H Schenkman; R P Derhagopian; E W Gould
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.493

2.  Atypical ductal hyperplasia on vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: suspicion for ductal carcinoma in situ can stratify patients at high risk for upgrade.

Authors:  Kimberly H Allison; Peter R Eby; Jennifer Kohr; Wendy B DeMartini; Constance D Lehman
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 3.466

3.  Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy performed on suspicious clustered microcalcifications: could patients without residual microcalcifications be managed conservatively?

Authors:  Alessandro Villa; Alberto Tagliafico; Fabio Chiesa; Maurizio Chiaramondia; Daniele Friedman; Massimo Calabrese
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Core biopsy of the breast with atypical ductal hyperplasia: a probabilistic approach to reporting.

Authors:  K A Ely; B A Carter; R A Jensen; J F Simpson; D L Page
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.394

5.  Scoring to predict the possibility of upgrades to malignancy in atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed by an 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy device: an external validation study.

Authors:  S Bendifallah; S Defert; N Chabbert-Buffet; N Maurin; J Chopier; M Antoine; C Bezu; D Touche; S Uzan; O Graesslin; R Rouzier
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  The natural history of low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in women treated by biopsy only revealed over 30 years of long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Melinda E Sanders; Peggy A Schuyler; William D Dupont; David L Page
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Stereotactic breast biopsy of atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ lesions: improved accuracy with directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy.

Authors:  F Burbank
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Vacuum-assisted stereotactic breast biopsy: histologic underestimation of malignant lesions.

Authors:  W E Burak; K E Owens; M B Tighe; L Kemp; S A Dinges; C L Hitchcock; J Olsen
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2000-06

9.  Atypical ductal hyperplasia: can some lesions be defined as probably benign after stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy, eliminating the recommendation for surgical excision?

Authors:  Roger J Jackman; Robyn L Birdwell; Debra M Ikeda
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  Nonmalignant lesions in breast core needle biopsies: to excise or not to excise?

Authors:  Timothy W Jacobs; James L Connolly; Stuart J Schnitt
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.394

View more
  4 in total

1.  Value of stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in non-palpable suspicious calcifications: an eight-year single institution experience with 587 patients.

Authors:  Shiping Li; Feilin Qu; Yinlong Yang; Lei Wang; Juping Shen; Zhiming Shao
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-10

2.  The Margins' Challenge: Risk Factors of Residual Disease After Breast Conserving Surgery in Early-stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Piero Fregatti; Marco Gipponi; Giulia Atzori; Raffaele DE Rosa; Raquel Diaz; Chiara Cornacchia; Marco Sparavigna; Alessandro Garlaschi; Liliana Belgioia; Alessandra Fozza; Francesca Pitto; Luca Boni; Eva Blondeaux; Francesca Depaoli; Federica Murelli; Simonetta Franchelli; Gabriele Zoppoli; Matteo Lambertini; Daniele Friedman
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Visualization positioning-guided biopsy of suspicious breast microcalcifications: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Liulu Zhang; Minyi Cheng; Yuanqi Chen; Xiaosheng Zhuang; Ciqiu Yang; Fei Ji; Hongfei Gao; Mei Yang; Teng Zhu; Jieqing Li; Kun Wang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-11

4.  Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia: Risk Factors for Predicting Pathologic Upgrade on Excisional Biopsy.

Authors:  Ko Woon Park; Boo-Kyung Han; Sun Jung Rhee; Soo Youn Cho; Eun Young Ko; Eun Sook Ko; Ji Soo Choi
Journal:  Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi       Date:  2021-10-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.