Literature DB >> 18059993

Plantar foot pressures after the augmented low dye taping technique.

Bill Vicenzino1, Thomas McPoil, Susan Buckland.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Taping and orthoses are frequently applied to control excessive foot pronation to treat or prevent musculoskeletal pain and injury of the lower limb. The mechanism(s) by which these devices bring about their clinical effects are at best speculative and require systematic evaluation.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the initial effect of the augmented low Dye taping technique (ALD) on plantar foot pressures during walking and jogging.
DESIGN: Within-subjects, repeated-measures randomized control trial.
SETTING: Gait research laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Fifteen women and 7 men with an average age of 28.0 +/- 7.4 years who were asymptomatic. INTERVENTION(S): Participants walked and jogged along a 12-m walkway before and after the application of ALD. The untaped side served as the control. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Peak and mean maximum plantar pressure data were calculated for the medial and lateral areas of the rear and midfoot and the medial, central, and lateral forefoot areas. Thus, a 3-factor model was tested: condition (ALD, control) x time (preapplication, postapplication) x area (medial and lateral rearfoot and midfoot and medial, central, and lateral forefoot).
RESULTS: Significant 3-way interactions were present for both peak and mean maximum plantar pressure during walking (F (6,126) = 9.55, P = .006 and F (6,126) = 11.36, P = .003, respectively) and jogging (F (6,126) = 5.76, P = .026 and F (6,126) = 4.56, P = .045, respectively) tasks. The ALD predominantly increased plantar pressures in the lateral midfoot during walking and jogging. In addition, tape reduced mean maximum pressure at the medial forefoot and at the medial rearfoot during walking.
CONCLUSIONS: The ALD, which has previously been shown to reduce excessive pronation, produced significant increases in lateral midfoot plantar pressures, thereby providing additional information to be considered when the mechanism(s) of action of such a treatment are modeled.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gait; pronation

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18059993      PMCID: PMC1978458     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  16 in total

Review 1.  Plantar pressure assessment.

Authors:  M N Orlin; T G McPoil
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2000-04

2.  The effect of low-Dye taping on peak plantar pressures of normal feet during gait.

Authors:  S J Russo; L S Chipchase
Journal:  Aust J Physiother       Date:  2001

3.  Arch structure and injury patterns in runners.

Authors:  D S Williams; I S McClay; J Hamill
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  The effect of low-Dye taping on plantar pressures, during gait, in subjects with navicular drop exceeding 10 mm.

Authors:  Belinda Lange; Lucy Chipchase; Angela Evans
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.751

Review 5.  Foot orthotics in the treatment of lower limb conditions: a musculoskeletal physiotherapy perspective.

Authors:  Bill Vicenzino
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2004-11

6.  Reliability of pressure measurements: the EM ED F system.

Authors:  J Hughes; L Pratt; K Linge; P Clark; L Klenerman
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 2.063

7.  Variability of plantar pressure data. A comparison of the two-step and midgait methods.

Authors:  T G McPoil; M W Cornwall; L Dupuis; M Cornwell
Journal:  J Am Podiatr Med Assoc       Date:  1999-10

8.  Navicular drop as a composite measure of excessive pronation.

Authors:  M J Mueller; J V Host; B J Norton
Journal:  J Am Podiatr Med Assoc       Date:  1993-04

9.  The effect of foot structure and range of motion on musculoskeletal overuse injuries.

Authors:  K R Kaufman; S K Brodine; R A Shaffer; C W Johnson; T R Cullison
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Reliability and validity of center-of-pressure quantification.

Authors:  Mark W Cornwall; Thomas G McPoil
Journal:  J Am Podiatr Med Assoc       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  A physiological and psychological basis for anti-pronation taping from a critical review of the literature.

Authors:  Melinda Franettovich; Andrew Chapman; Peter Blanch; Bill Vicenzino
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  The effect of exercise and time on the height and width of the medial longitudinal arch following the modified reverse-6 and the modified augmented low-dye taping procedures.

Authors:  Mark W Cornwall; Thomas G McPoil; Austin Fair
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2014-10

3.  Arch-Taping Techniques for Altering Navicular Height and Plantar Pressures During Activity.

Authors:  Tim Newell; Janet Simon; Carrie L Docherty
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  The effects of the application of low-dye taping on paretic side plantar pressure among patients with plantar fasciitis.

Authors:  Chan Park; Sangyong Lee; Shingyun Kim; Gak Hwangbo
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-11-30

5.  Short-term effects of sports taping on navicular height, navicular drop and peak plantar pressure in healthy elite athletes: A within-subject comparison.

Authors:  Taegyu Kim; Jong-Chul Park
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Clinical and Biomechanical Effects of Low-Dye Taping and Figure-8 Modification of Low-Dye Taping in Patients With Heel Pad Atrophy.

Authors:  You Hyeon Chae; Joo Sup Kim; Yeon Kang; Hyun Young Kim; Tae Im Yi
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2018-04-30

7.  Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy Versus Kinesiology Taping in the Management of Plantar Fasciitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Banu Ordahan; Gözde Türkoğlu; Ali Yavuz Karahan; Halil Ekrem Akkurt
Journal:  Arch Rheumatol       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 1.472

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.