PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to determine the impact of 13N-ammonia positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) on clinical decision making and its cost-effectiveness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred consecutive patients (28 women, 72 men; mean age 60.9 +/- 12.0 years; range 24-85 years) underwent 13N-ammonia PET scanning (and computed tomography, used only for attenuation correction) to assess myocardial perfusion in patients with known (n = 79) or suspected (n = 8) coronary artery disease (CAD), or for suspected small-vessel disease (SVD; n = 13). Before PET, the referring physician was asked to determine patient treatment if PET would not be available. Four weeks later, PET patient management was reassessed for each patient individually. RESULTS: Before PET management strategies would have been: diagnostic angiography (62 of 100 patients), diagnostic angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI; 6 of 100), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG; 3 of 100), transplantation (1 of 100), or conservative medical treatment (28 of 100). After PET scanning, treatment strategies were altered in 78 patients leading to: diagnostic angiography (0 of 100), PCI (20 of 100), CABG (3 of 100), transplantation (1 of 100), or conservative medical treatment (76 of 100). Patient management followed the recommendations of PET findings in 97% of the cases. Cost-effectiveness analysis revealed lower costs of <euro>206/patient as a result of PET scanning. CONCLUSION: In a population with a high prevalence of known CAD, PET is cost-effective and has an important impact on patient management.
PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to determine the impact of 13N-ammonia positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) on clinical decision making and its cost-effectiveness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred consecutive patients (28 women, 72 men; mean age 60.9 +/- 12.0 years; range 24-85 years) underwent 13N-ammonia PET scanning (and computed tomography, used only for attenuation correction) to assess myocardial perfusion in patients with known (n = 79) or suspected (n = 8) coronary artery disease (CAD), or for suspected small-vessel disease (SVD; n = 13). Before PET, the referring physician was asked to determine patient treatment if PET would not be available. Four weeks later, PET patient management was reassessed for each patient individually. RESULTS: Before PET management strategies would have been: diagnostic angiography (62 of 100 patients), diagnostic angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI; 6 of 100), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG; 3 of 100), transplantation (1 of 100), or conservative medical treatment (28 of 100). After PET scanning, treatment strategies were altered in 78 patients leading to: diagnostic angiography (0 of 100), PCI (20 of 100), CABG (3 of 100), transplantation (1 of 100), or conservative medical treatment (76 of 100). Patient management followed the recommendations of PET findings in 97% of the cases. Cost-effectiveness analysis revealed lower costs of <euro>206/patient as a result of PET scanning. CONCLUSION: In a population with a high prevalence of known CAD, PET is cost-effective and has an important impact on patient management.
Authors: L J Shaw; R Hachamovitch; D S Berman; T H Marwick; M S Lauer; G V Heller; A E Iskandrian; K L Kesler; M I Travin; H C Lewin; R C Hendel; S Borges-Neto; D D Miller Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1999-03 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: P G Camici; P Marraccini; R Lorenzoni; G Buzzigoli; N Pecori; A Perissinotto; E Ferrannini; A L'Abbate; M Marzilli Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1991-06 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Michael E Merhige; William J Breen; Victoria Shelton; Teresa Houston; Brian J D'Arcy; Anthony F Perna Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: G D Hutchins; M Schwaiger; K C Rosenspire; J Krivokapich; H Schelbert; D E Kuhl Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1990-04 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: R E Stewart; M Schwaiger; E Molina; J Popma; G M Gacioch; M Kalus; S Squicciarini; Z R al-Aouar; A Schork; D E Kuhl Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 1991-06-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Pascal Koepfli; Christophe A Wyss; Mehdi Namdar; Michael Klainguti; Gustav K von Schulthess; Thomas F Lüscher; Philipp A Kaufmann Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Manuela Jörg-Ciopor; Mehdi Namdar; Jurai Turina; Rolf Jenni; Jürg Schwitter; Marko Turina; Otto M Hess; Philipp A Kaufmann Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Dong-Yeon Kim; Hyeon Sik Kim; Hwa Youn Jang; Ju Han Kim; Hee-Seung Bom; Jung-Joon Min Journal: ACS Med Chem Lett Date: 2014-09-10 Impact factor: 4.345
Authors: John O Prior; Gilles Allenbach; Ines Valenta; Marek Kosinski; Cyrill Burger; Francis R Verdun; Angelika Bischof Delaloye; Philipp A Kaufmann Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2012-03-08 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Salah Am Said; Aly Agool; Arno Hm Moons; Mounir Wz Basalus; Nils Rl Wagenaar; Rogier Lg Nijhuis; Jutta M Schroeder-Tanka; Riemer Hja Slart Journal: World J Cardiol Date: 2018-10-26