OBJECTIVE: The myelin protein Nogo inhibits axon regeneration by binding to its receptor (NgR) on axons. Intrathecal delivery of an NgR antagonist (NEP1-40) promotes growth of injured corticospinal axons and recovery of motor function following a dorsal hemisection. The authors used a similar design to examine recovery and repair after a lesion that interrupts the rubrospinal tract (RST). METHODS: Rats received a lateral funiculotomy at C4 and NEP1-40 or vehicle was delivered to the cervical spinal cord for 4 weeks. Outcome measures included motor and sensory tests and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Gait analysis showed recovery in the NEP1-40-treated group compared to operated controls, and a test of forelimb usage also showed a beneficial effect. The density of labeled RST axons increased ipsilaterally in the NEP1-40 group in the lateral funiculus rostral to the lesion and contralaterally in both gray and white matter. Thus, rubrospinal axons exhibited diminished dieback and/or growth up to the lesion site. This was accompanied by greater density of 5HT and calcitonin gene-related peptide axons adjacent to and into the lesion/matrix site in the NEP1-40 group. CONCLUSIONS: NgR blockade after RST injury is associated with axonal growth and/or diminished dieback of severed RST axons up to but not into or beyond the lesion/matrix site, and growth of serotonergic and dorsal root axons adjacent to and into the lesion/matrix site. NgR blockade also supported partial recovery of function. The authors' results indicate that severed rubrospinal axons respond to NEP1-40 treatment but less robustly than corticospinal, raphe-spinal, or dorsal root axons.
OBJECTIVE: The myelin protein Nogo inhibits axon regeneration by binding to its receptor (NgR) on axons. Intrathecal delivery of an NgR antagonist (NEP1-40) promotes growth of injured corticospinal axons and recovery of motor function following a dorsal hemisection. The authors used a similar design to examine recovery and repair after a lesion that interrupts the rubrospinal tract (RST). METHODS:Rats received a lateral funiculotomy at C4 and NEP1-40 or vehicle was delivered to the cervical spinal cord for 4 weeks. Outcome measures included motor and sensory tests and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Gait analysis showed recovery in the NEP1-40-treated group compared to operated controls, and a test of forelimb usage also showed a beneficial effect. The density of labeled RST axons increased ipsilaterally in the NEP1-40 group in the lateral funiculus rostral to the lesion and contralaterally in both gray and white matter. Thus, rubrospinal axons exhibited diminished dieback and/or growth up to the lesion site. This was accompanied by greater density of 5HT and calcitonin gene-related peptide axons adjacent to and into the lesion/matrix site in the NEP1-40 group. CONCLUSIONS:NgR blockade after RST injury is associated with axonal growth and/or diminished dieback of severed RST axons up to but not into or beyond the lesion/matrix site, and growth of serotonergic and dorsal root axons adjacent to and into the lesion/matrix site. NgR blockade also supported partial recovery of function. The authors' results indicate that severed rubrospinal axons respond to NEP1-40 treatment but less robustly than corticospinal, raphe-spinal, or dorsal root axons.
Authors: R Prinjha; S E Moore; M Vinson; S Blake; R Morrow; G Christie; D Michalovich; D L Simmons; F S Walsh Journal: Nature Date: 2000-01-27 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Patrick Freund; Eric Schmidlin; Thierry Wannier; Jocelyne Bloch; Anis Mir; Martin E Schwab; Eric M Rouiller Journal: Nat Med Date: 2006-07-02 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: M S Chen; A B Huber; M E van der Haar; M Frank; L Schnell; A A Spillmann; F Christ; M E Schwab Journal: Nature Date: 2000-01-27 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Zhaohui Shao; Jeffrey L Browning; Xinhua Lee; Martin L Scott; Sveltlana Shulga-Morskaya; Norm Allaire; Greg Thill; Melissa Levesque; Dinah Sah; John M McCoy; Beth Murray; Vincent Jung; R Blake Pepinsky; Sha Mi Journal: Neuron Date: 2005-02-03 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Benxiu Ji; Mingwei Li; Stephane Budel; R Blake Pepinsky; Lee Walus; Thomas M Engber; Stephen M Strittmatter; Jane K Relton Journal: Eur J Neurosci Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 3.386
Authors: Xingxing Wang; Philip Duffy; Aaron W McGee; Omar Hasan; Grahame Gould; Nathan Tu; Noam Y Harel; Yiyun Huang; Richard E Carson; David Weinzimmer; Jim Ropchan; Larry I Benowitz; William B J Cafferty; Stephen M Strittmatter Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Elisa Janine Gonzalez-Rothi; Angela M Rombola; Celeste A Rousseau; Lynne M Mercier; Garrett M Fitzpatrick; Paul J Reier; David D Fuller; Michael A Lane Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2015-05-05 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Brian K Kwon; Elena B Okon; Ward Plunet; Darryl Baptiste; Karim Fouad; Jessica Hillyer; Lynne C Weaver; Michael G Fehlings; Wolfram Tetzlaff Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2010-06-16 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Anita Singh; Laura Krisa; Kelly L Frederick; Harra Sandrow-Feinberg; Sriram Balasubramanian; Scott K Stackhouse; Marion Murray; Jed S Shumsky Journal: J Neurosci Methods Date: 2014-01-24 Impact factor: 2.390
Authors: Manuel D Galvan; Sabina Luchetti; Adrian M Burgos; Hal X Nguyen; Mitra J Hooshmand; Frank P T Hamers; Aileen J Anderson Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2008-12-17 Impact factor: 6.167