Anita Singh1, Laura Krisa2, Kelly L Frederick3, Harra Sandrow-Feinberg3, Sriram Balasubramanian4, Scott K Stackhouse3, Marion Murray3, Jed S Shumsky3. 1. University of Delaware, Newark, DE, United States. Electronic address: anitausingh@hotmail.com. 2. Drexel University, College of Medicine, Queen Lane, Philadelphia, PA, United States; Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States. 3. Drexel University, College of Medicine, Queen Lane, Philadelphia, PA, United States. 4. Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) models in rats have become increasingly useful because of their translational potential. The goal of this study was to design, develop and validate a quick and reliable forelimb locomotor rating scale for adult rats with unilateral cervical SCI injury. NEW METHOD: Adult female rats were subjected to a C5 unilateral mild contusion (n=10), moderate contusion (n=10) or hemisection injury (n=9). Forelimb locomotion was evaluated before injury, four times during the first week (Days 2, 3, 4 and 7) and weekly for up to 8 weeks post-injury. Scoring categories were identified and animals were ranked based on their performance in these categories. The scale was validated for its usefulness by comparing animals with different injury models (dorsolateral funiculotomy C3/4), levels of injury (moderate contusion C4) and sex (male - moderate contusion C3/4) and also by correlating FLS scores with other established behavioral tests (grid walking and kinetic tests). RESULTS AND COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: Forelimb performance on both the grid-walking and kinetic tests was positively correlated with the forelimb locomotor rating scale (FLS). Histological analysis established a positive correlation between the spared tissue and the observed FLS score. Our results show that the new rating scale can reliably detect forelimb deficits and recovery predicted by other behavioral tests. Furthermore, the new method provides reproducible data between trained and naïve examiners. CONCLUSION: In summary, the proposed rating scale is a useful tool for assessment of injury and treatments designed to enhance recovery after unilateral cervical SCI.
BACKGROUND: Cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) models in rats have become increasingly useful because of their translational potential. The goal of this study was to design, develop and validate a quick and reliable forelimb locomotor rating scale for adult rats with unilateral cervical SCI injury. NEW METHOD: Adult female rats were subjected to a C5 unilateral mild contusion (n=10), moderate contusion (n=10) or hemisection injury (n=9). Forelimb locomotion was evaluated before injury, four times during the first week (Days 2, 3, 4 and 7) and weekly for up to 8 weeks post-injury. Scoring categories were identified and animals were ranked based on their performance in these categories. The scale was validated for its usefulness by comparing animals with different injury models (dorsolateral funiculotomy C3/4), levels of injury (moderate contusion C4) and sex (male - moderate contusion C3/4) and also by correlating FLS scores with other established behavioral tests (grid walking and kinetic tests). RESULTS AND COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: Forelimb performance on both the grid-walking and kinetic tests was positively correlated with the forelimb locomotor rating scale (FLS). Histological analysis established a positive correlation between the spared tissue and the observed FLS score. Our results show that the new rating scale can reliably detect forelimb deficits and recovery predicted by other behavioral tests. Furthermore, the new method provides reproducible data between trained and naïve examiners. CONCLUSION: In summary, the proposed rating scale is a useful tool for assessment of injury and treatments designed to enhance recovery after unilateral cervical SCI.
Authors: D Michele Basso; Lesley C Fisher; Aileen J Anderson; Lyn B Jakeman; Dana M McTigue; Phillip G Popovich Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Stephen M Onifer; Yi Ping Zhang; Darlene A Burke; Donna L Brooks; Julie A Decker; Natasha J McClure; Andrea R Floyd; Jacob Hall; Bryan L Proffitt; Christopher B Shields; David S K Magnuson Journal: Exp Neurol Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 5.330
Authors: Rachel P Allred; DeAnna L Adkins; Martin T Woodlee; Lincoln C Husbands; Mónica A Maldonado; Jacqueline R Kane; Timothy Schallert; Theresa A Jones Journal: J Neurosci Methods Date: 2008-02-01 Impact factor: 2.390
Authors: Jared T Wilcox; Kajana Satkunendrarajah; Jeffrey A Zuccato; Farshad Nassiri; Michael G Fehlings Journal: Stem Cells Transl Med Date: 2014-08-08 Impact factor: 6.940
Authors: Megan Ryan Detloff; Daniel Quiros-Molina; Amy S Javia; Lekhaj Daggubati; Anthony D Nehlsen; Ali Naqvi; Vinu Ninan; Kirsten N Vannix; Mary-Katharine McMullen; Sheena Amin; Patrick D Ganzer; John D Houlé Journal: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Date: 2015-12-14 Impact factor: 3.919
Authors: Anna Fredrika Boström; Heli Katariina Hyytiäinen; Petteri Koho; Sigitas Cizinauskas; Anna Katrina Hielm-Björkman Journal: Acta Vet Scand Date: 2018-09-17 Impact factor: 1.695