Literature DB >> 18054981

Aging disrupts the neural transformations that link facial identity across views.

Claudine Habak1, Frances Wilkinson, Hugh R Wilson.   

Abstract

Healthy human aging can have adverse effects on cortical function and on the brain's ability to integrate visual information to form complex representations. Facial identification is crucial to successful social discourse, and yet, it remains unclear whether the neuronal mechanisms underlying face perception per se, and the speed with which they process information, change with age. We present face images whose discrimination relies strictly on the shape and geometry of a face at various stimulus durations. Interestingly, we demonstrate that facial identity matching is maintained with age when faces are shown in the same view (e.g., front-front or side-side), regardless of exposure duration, but degrades when faces are shown in different views (e.g., front and turned 20 degrees to the side) and does not improve at longer durations. Our results indicate that perceptual processing speed for complex representations and the mechanisms underlying same-view facial identity discrimination are maintained with age. In contrast, information is degraded in the neural transformations that represent facial identity across views. We suggest that the accumulation of useful information over time to refine a representation within a population of neurons saturates earlier in the aging visual system than it does in the younger system and contributes to the age-related deterioration of face discrimination across views.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18054981      PMCID: PMC4828250          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.10.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  37 in total

1.  Degradation of stimulus selectivity of visual cortical cells in senescent rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  M T Schmolesky; Y Wang; M Pu; A G Leventhal
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Senile changes in visual acuity.

Authors:  R A Weale
Journal:  Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K       Date:  1975-04

3.  Size-invariant but viewpoint-dependent representation of faces.

Authors:  Yunjo Lee; Kazumichi Matsumiya; Hugh R Wilson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 4.  The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition.

Authors:  T A Salthouse
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Face recognition in the elderly.

Authors:  Lori A Lott; Gunilla Haegerstrom-Portnoy; Marilyn E Schneck; John A Brabyn
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Network analysis of cortical visual pathways mapped with PET.

Authors:  A R McIntosh; C L Grady; L G Ungerleider; J V Haxby; S I Rapoport; B Horwitz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Aging and low-contrast vision: face perception.

Authors:  C Owsley; R Sekuler; C Boldt
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Preservation of episodic visual recognition memory in aging.

Authors:  Robert Sekuler; Michael J Kahana; Chris McLaughlin; Julie Golomb; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2005 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.645

9.  GABA and its agonists improved visual cortical function in senescent monkeys.

Authors:  Audie G Leventhal; Yongchang Wang; Mingliang Pu; Yifeng Zhou; Yuanye Ma
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-05-02       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 10.  The effects of normal aging on myelin and nerve fibers: a review.

Authors:  Alan Peters
Journal:  J Neurocytol       Date:  2002 Sep-Nov
View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  Aging and vision.

Authors:  Cynthia Owsley
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Reduction in white matter connectivity, revealed by diffusion tensor imaging, may account for age-related changes in face perception.

Authors:  Cibu Thomas; Linda Moya; Galia Avidan; Kate Humphreys; Kwan Jin Jung; Mary A Peterson; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Reduced ability to detect facial configuration in middle-aged and elderly individuals: associations with spatiotemporal visual processing.

Authors:  Daniel Norton; Ryan McBain; Yue Chen
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2009-03-02       Impact factor: 4.077

4.  Dedifferentiated face processing in older adults is linked to lower resting state metabolic activity in fusiform face area.

Authors:  Leslie Zebrowitz; Noreen Ward; Jasmine Boshyan; Angela Gutchess; Nouchine Hadjikhani
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Age-related changes in matching novel objects across viewpoints.

Authors:  Karin S Pilz; Yaroslav Konar; Quoc C Vuong; Patrick J Bennett; Allison B Sekuler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Ageing and visual spatiotemporal processing.

Authors:  Karin S Pilz; Marina Kunchulia; Khatuna Parkosadze; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Age-related changes in processing faces from detection to identification: ERP evidence.

Authors:  Sharon Daniel; Shlomo Bentin
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 4.673

8.  Identity modulates short-term memory for facial emotion.

Authors:  Murray Galster; Michael J Kahana; Hugh R Wilson; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Why are some people's names easier to learn than others? The effects of face similarity on memory for face-name associations.

Authors:  Peter C Pantelis; Marieke K van Vugt; Robert Sekuler; Hugh R Wilson; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-09

10.  Age-related delay in information accrual for faces: evidence from a parametric, single-trial EEG approach.

Authors:  Guillaume A Rousselet; Jesse S Husk; Cyril R Pernet; Carl M Gaspar; Patrick J Bennett; Allison B Sekuler
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 3.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.