Literature DB >> 16469348

Size-invariant but viewpoint-dependent representation of faces.

Yunjo Lee1, Kazumichi Matsumiya, Hugh R Wilson.   

Abstract

The present study investigated the role of size and view on face discrimination, using a novel set of synthetic face stimuli. Face discrimination thresholds were measured using a 2AFC match-to-sample paradigm, where faces were discriminated from a mean face. In Experiment 1, which assessed the effect of size alone, subjects had to match faces that differed in size up to four-fold. In Experiment 2 where only viewpoint was manipulated, a target face was presented at one of four different views (0 degree front, 6.7 degrees, 13.3 degrees, and 20 degrees side) and subsequent matches appeared either at the same or different view. Experiment 3 investigated how face view interacts with size changes, and subjects matched faces differing both in size and view. The results were as follows: (1) size changes up to four-fold had no effect on face discrimination; (2) threshold for matching different face views increased with angular difference from frontal view; (3) size differences across different views had no effect on face discrimination. Additionally, the present study found a perceptual boundary between 6.7 degrees and 13.3 degrees side views, grouping 0 degrees front and 6.7 degrees side views together and 13.3 degrees and 20 degrees side views together. This suggests categorical perception of face view. The present study concludes that face view and size are processed by parallel mechanisms.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16469348     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  8 in total

1.  Aging disrupts the neural transformations that link facial identity across views.

Authors:  Claudine Habak; Frances Wilkinson; Hugh R Wilson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Effect of familiarity and viewpoint on face recognition in chimpanzees.

Authors:  Lisa A Parr; Erin Siebert; Jessica Taubert
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  Matching faces with emotional expressions.

Authors:  Wenfeng Chen; Karen Lander; Chang Hong Liu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-08-30

4.  Viewing distance matter to perceived intensity of facial expressions.

Authors:  Andreas Gerhardsson; Lennart Högman; Håkan Fischer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-02

5.  On Response Bias in the Face Congruency Effect for Internal and External Features.

Authors:  Günter Meinhardt; Bozana Meinhardt-Injac; Malte Persike
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  About Face: Matching Unfamiliar Faces Across Rotations of View and Lighting.

Authors:  Simone Favelle; Harold Hill; Peter Claes
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-11-29

7.  Incongruence in Lighting Impairs Face Identification.

Authors:  Denise Y Lim; Alan L F Lee; Charles C-F Or
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-02-28

8.  Healthy aging impairs face discrimination ability.

Authors:  Andrew J Logan; Gael E Gordon; Gunter Loffler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 2.004

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.