Literature DB >> 18049825

Leaf litter input mediates tadpole performance across forest canopy treatments.

Bethany K Williams1, Tracy A G Rittenhouse, Raymond D Semlitsch.   

Abstract

Understanding the mechanisms limiting the distributions of organisms is necessary for predicting changes in community composition along habitat gradients. In many areas of the USA, land originally cleared for agriculture has been undergoing a process of reforestation, creating a gradient of canopy cover. For small temporary wetlands, this gradient can alter abiotic conditions and influence the resource base of wetland food webs by affecting litter inputs. As distributions of amphibians and many other temporary wetland taxa correlate with canopy cover, we experimentally manipulated shade levels and litter types in pond mesocosms to explore mechanisms limiting species performance in wetlands with canopy cover. Most differences between ponds were mediated by litter type rather than direct effects of shading. Although all three amphibian species tested are open-canopy specialists, spring peepers were the only species to show decreased survival in shaded ponds. Pond litter type generally had strong effects on growth and development rates, with tadpoles of two species in grass litter ponds growing to twice the size of, and metamorphosing 7 days earlier than, those in leaf litter ponds. Contrary to our initial hypothesis, shade level and litter type showed very few significant interactions. Our results indicate that the effects of shading cannot be considered in isolation of vegetation changes in pond basins when evaluating the effects of forest succession on temporary pond communities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18049825     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-007-0920-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  8 in total

1.  Habitat selection determines abundance, richness and species composition of beetles in aquatic communities.

Authors:  Christopher A Binckley; William J Resetarits
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Returning forests analyzed with the forest identity.

Authors:  Pekka E Kauppi; Jesse H Ausubel; Jingyun Fang; Alexander S Mather; Roger A Sedjo; Paul E Waggoner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Predatory salamanders reverse the outcome of competition among three species of anuran tadpoles.

Authors:  P J Morin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-06-12       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Top-down effects of a terrestrial frog on forest nutrient dynamics.

Authors:  Karen H Beard; Kristiina A Vogt; Andrew Kulmatiski
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2002-12-01       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Remarkable amphibian biomass and abundance in an isolated wetland: implications for wetland conservation.

Authors:  J Whitfield Gibbons; Christopher T Winne; David E Scott; John D Willson; Xavier Glaudas; Kimberly M Andrews; Brian D Todd; Luke A Fedewa; Lucas Wilkinson; Ria N Tsaliagos; Steven J Harper; Judith L Greene; Tracey D Tuberville; Brian S Metts; Michael E Dorcas; John P Nestor; Cameron A Young; Tom Akre; Robert N Reed; Kurt A Buhlmann; Jason Norman; Dean A Croshaw; Cris Hagen; Betsie B Rothermel
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 6.560

6.  Forest mediated light regime linked to amphibian distribution and performance.

Authors:  M A Halverson; D K Skelly; J M Kiesecker; L K Freidenburg
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-01-09       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Culex restuans (Diptera: Culicidae) oviposition behavior determined by larval habitat quality and quantity in southeastern Michigan.

Authors:  Michael H Reiskind; Mark L Wilson
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.278

8.  Effects of forest canopy on habitat selection in treefrogs and aquatic insects: implications for communities and metacommunities.

Authors:  Christopher A Binckley; William J Resetarits
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-07-11       Impact factor: 3.225

  8 in total
  9 in total

1.  Reciprocal subsidies in ponds: does leaf input increase frog biomass export?

Authors:  Julia E Earl; Raymond D Semlitsch
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Tree leaf litter composition drives temporal variation in aquatic beetle colonization and assemblage structure in lentic systems.

Authors:  Matthew R Pintar; William J Resetarits
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Leaf litter resource quality induces morphological changes in wood frog (Lithobates sylvaticus) metamorphs.

Authors:  Aaron B Stoler; Jeffrey P Stephens; Rick A Relyea; Keith A Berven; Scott D Tiegs
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-07-19       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Community-weighted mean functional effect traits determine larval amphibian responses to litter mixtures.

Authors:  J S Cohen; S-K D Rainford; B Blossey
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Leaf litter input to ponds can dramatically alter amphibian morphological phenotypes.

Authors:  Julia E Earl
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Effects of subsidy quality on reciprocal subsidies: how leaf litter species changes frog biomass export.

Authors:  Julia E Earl; Paula O Castello; Kara E Cohagen; Raymond D Semlitsch
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Intraspecific variation overrides origin effects in impacts of litter-derived secondary compounds on larval amphibians.

Authors:  Laura J Martin; Bernd Blossey
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-03-03       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Slipping through the cracks: rubber plantation is unsuitable breeding habitat for frogs in Xishuangbanna, China.

Authors:  Jocelyn E Behm; Xiaodong Yang; Jin Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Pool choice in a vertical landscape: Tadpole-rearing site flexibility in phytotelm-breeding frogs.

Authors:  Chloe A Fouilloux; Shirley Jennifer Serrano Rojas; Juan David Carvajal-Castro; Janne K Valkonen; Philippe Gaucher; Marie-Therese Fischer; Andrius Pašukonis; Bibiana Rojas
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 2.912

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.