Literature DB >> 17148209

Habitat selection determines abundance, richness and species composition of beetles in aquatic communities.

Christopher A Binckley1, William J Resetarits.   

Abstract

Distribution and abundance patterns at the community and metacommunity scale can result from two distinct mechanisms. Random dispersal followed by non-random, site-specific mortality (species sorting) is the dominant paradigm in community ecology, while habitat selection provides an alternative, largely unexplored, mechanism with different demographic consequences. Rather than differential mortality, habitat selection involves redistribution of individuals among habitat patches based on perceived rather than realized fitness, with perceptions driven by past selection. In particular, habitat preferences based on species composition can create distinct patterns of positive and negative covariance among species, generating more complex linkages among communities than with random dispersal models. In our experiments, the mere presence of predatory fishes, in the absence of any mortality, reduced abundance and species richness of aquatic beetles by up to 80% in comparison with the results from fishless controls. Beetle species' shared habitat preferences generated distinct patterns of species richness, species composition and total abundance, matching large-scale field patterns previously ascribed to random dispersal and differential mortality. Our results indicate that landscape-level patterns of distribution and species diversity can be driven to a large extent by habitat selection behaviour, a critical, but largely overlooked, mechanism of community and metacommunity assembly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 17148209      PMCID: PMC1617157          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2005.0310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  4 in total

1.  Dispersal rates affect species composition in metacommunities of Sarracenia purpurea inquilines.

Authors:  Jamie M Kneitel; Thomas E Miller
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2003-07-16       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 2.  Toward an ecological synthesis: a case for habitat selection.

Authors:  Douglas W Morris
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-04-11       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Effects of competition, predation, and dispersal on species richness at local and regional scales.

Authors:  J B Shurin; E G Allen
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Habitat selection behaviour links local and regional scales in aquatic systems.

Authors:  William J Resetarits
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 9.492

  4 in total
  22 in total

1.  Light triggers habitat choice of eyeless subterranean but not of eyed surface amphipods.

Authors:  Žiga Fišer; Luka Novak; Roman Luštrik; Cene Fišer
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2016-01-12

2.  Leaf litter input mediates tadpole performance across forest canopy treatments.

Authors:  Bethany K Williams; Tracy A G Rittenhouse; Raymond D Semlitsch
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-11-30       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Pesticide alters oviposition site selection in gray treefrogs.

Authors:  James R Vonesh; Julia C Buck
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-07-31       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Beetle and plant density as cues initiating dispersal in two species of adult predaceous diving beetles.

Authors:  Donald A Yee; Stacy Taylor; Steven M Vamosi
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Pesticide alters habitat selection and aquatic community composition.

Authors:  James R Vonesh; Johanna M Kraus
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-02-28       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Tree leaf litter composition drives temporal variation in aquatic beetle colonization and assemblage structure in lentic systems.

Authors:  Matthew R Pintar; William J Resetarits
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Habitat choice meets thermal specialization: Competition with specialists may drive suboptimal habitat preferences in generalists.

Authors:  Staffan Jacob; Estelle Laurent; Bart Haegeman; Romain Bertrand; Jérôme G Prunier; Delphine Legrand; Julien Cote; Alexis S Chaine; Michel Loreau; Jean Clobert; Nicolas Schtickzelle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Spatial contagion drives colonization and recruitment of frogflies on clutches of red-eyed treefrogs.

Authors:  Myra C Hughey; Michael W McCoy; James R Vonesh; Karen M Warkentin
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Patch quality and context, but not patch number, drive multi-scale colonization dynamics in experimental aquatic landscapes.

Authors:  William J Resetarits; Christopher A Binckley
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Giving predators a wide berth: quantifying behavioral predator shadows in colonizing aquatic beetles.

Authors:  William J Resetarits
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.