Literature DB >> 12131172

Proprioceptive function, clinical results, and quality of life after unicondylar sledge prostheses.

S Fuchs1, D Frisse, C O Tibesku, H Laass, D Rosenbaum.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of proprioceptive performance and quality of life after implantation of unicondylar sledge knee prostheses in comparison with normal control subjects.
DESIGN: A total of 17 patients were examined after implantation of unicondylar sledge prostheses. Clinical examination was performed, quality of life was assessed, and proprioceptive performance was examined. A total of 11 healthy subjects of comparable age served as a control group.
RESULTS: Clinical results of both groups differed significantly in all categories. Quality-of-life assessment differed only in the following items: physical functioning, role limitation caused by physical problems, and bodily pain. Other than angle reproduction at 15 degrees, no significant differences in proprioceptive testing, neither sway measurement nor angle reproduction, were found. Statistical analysis revealed no correlation between clinical scores and proprioceptive results.
CONCLUSIONS: In comparison with normal control subjects of comparable age, the implantation of unicondylar sledge prostheses does not result in proprioceptive deficits. Except for physical functioning, role limitations caused by physical problems and bodily pain, most aspects of quality of life do not differ between patients and control subjects, although the patients' clinical results were significantly lower than the controls.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12131172     DOI: 10.1097/00002060-200207000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0894-9115            Impact factor:   2.159


  5 in total

1.  Clinical and functional comparison of uni- and bicondylar sledge prostheses.

Authors:  S Fuchs; C O Tibesku; D Frisse; M Genkinger; H Laass; D Rosenbaum
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2004-12-24       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Clinical and functional results after the rehabilitation period in minimally-invasive unicondylar knee arthroplasty patients.

Authors:  Susanne Fuchs; Bernd Rolauffs; Thorsten Plaumann; Carsten O Tibesku; Dieter Rosenbaum
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2004-06-02       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Proprioception after bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty is comparable to unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Florian Baumann; Özkan Bahadin; Werner Krutsch; Johannes Zellner; Michael Nerlich; Peter Angele; Carsten Oliver Tibesku
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  [Minimally invasive unicondylar knee arthroplasty with simultaneous ACL reconstruction : treatment of medial compartment osteoarthritis and cruciate ligament defect].

Authors:  M Tinius; T M Ecker; S Klima; W Tinius; C Josten
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 0.918

5.  Tissue sparing surgery in knee reconstruction: unicompartmental (UKA), patellofemoral (PFA), UKA + PFA, bi-unicompartmental (Bi-UKA) arthroplasties.

Authors:  N Confalonieri; A Manzotti; F Montironi; C Pullen
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2008-07-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.