Literature DB >> 18046416

The centromere geometry essential for keeping mitosis error free is controlled by spindle forces.

Jadranka Loncarek1, Olga Kisurina-Evgenieva, Tatiana Vinogradova, Polla Hergert, Sabrina La Terra, Tarun M Kapoor, Alexey Khodjakov.   

Abstract

Accurate segregation of chromosomes, essential for the stability of the genome, depends on 'bi-orientation'-simultaneous attachment of each individual chromosome to both poles of the mitotic spindle. On bi-oriented chromosomes, kinetochores (macromolecular complexes that attach the chromosome to the spindle) reside on the opposite sides of the chromosome's centromere. In contrast, sister kinetochores shift towards one side of the centromere on 'syntelic' chromosomes that erroneously attach to one spindle pole with both sister kinetochores. Syntelic attachments often arise during spindle assembly and must be corrected to prevent chromosome loss. It is assumed that restoration of proper centromere architecture occurs automatically owing to elastic properties of the centromere. Here we test this assumption by combining laser microsurgery and chemical biology assays in cultured mammalian cells. We find that kinetochores of syntelic chromosomes remain juxtaposed on detachment from spindle microtubules. These findings reveal that correction of syntelic attachments involves an extra step that has previously been overlooked: external forces must be applied to move sister kinetochores to the opposite sides of the centromere. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the shape of the centromere is important for spindle assembly, because bipolar spindles do not form in cells lacking centrosomes when multiple chromosomes with juxtaposed kinetochores are present. Thus, proper architecture of the centromere makes an important contribution to achieving high fidelity of chromosome segregation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18046416      PMCID: PMC2586812          DOI: 10.1038/nature06344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  27 in total

1.  Centrosome-independent mitotic spindle formation in vertebrates.

Authors:  A Khodjakov; R W Cole; B R Oakley; C L Rieder
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2000-01-27       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 2.  The vertebrate cell kinetochore and its roles during mitosis.

Authors:  C L Rieder; E D Salmon
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 20.808

Review 3.  How cells get the right chromosomes.

Authors:  R B Nicklas
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-01-31       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  The sudden recruitment of gamma-tubulin to the centrosome at the onset of mitosis and its dynamic exchange throughout the cell cycle, do not require microtubules.

Authors:  A Khodjakov; C L Rieder
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1999-08-09       Impact factor: 10.539

Review 5.  Focusing on spindle poles.

Authors:  D A Compton
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 5.285

6.  Kinetochore-driven formation of kinetochore fibers contributes to spindle assembly during animal mitosis.

Authors:  Helder Maiato; Conly L Rieder; Alexey Khodjakov
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2004-11-29       Impact factor: 10.539

7.  Probing spindle assembly mechanisms with monastrol, a small molecule inhibitor of the mitotic kinesin, Eg5.

Authors:  T M Kapoor; T U Mayer; M L Coughlin; T J Mitchison
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2000-09-04       Impact factor: 10.539

8.  Centrosomes enhance the fidelity of cytokinesis in vertebrates and are required for cell cycle progression.

Authors:  A Khodjakov; C L Rieder
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2001-04-02       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Localization of Mad2 to kinetochores depends on microtubule attachment, not tension.

Authors:  J C Waters; R H Chen; A W Murray; E D Salmon
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1998-06-01       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  The checkpoint delaying anaphase in response to chromosome monoorientation is mediated by an inhibitory signal produced by unattached kinetochores.

Authors:  C L Rieder; R W Cole; A Khodjakov; G Sluder
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  58 in total

Review 1.  Regulatory mechanisms of kinetochore-microtubule interaction in mitosis.

Authors:  Kozo Tanaka
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 2.  Chromosomes and cancer cells.

Authors:  Sarah L Thompson; Duane A Compton
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 3.  Mitosis in vertebrates: the G2/M and M/A transitions and their associated checkpoints.

Authors:  Conly L Rieder
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 4.  Mechanisms of chromosomal instability.

Authors:  Sarah L Thompson; Samuel F Bakhoum; Duane A Compton
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 5.  Clearing the way for mitosis: is cohesin a target?

Authors:  Mitsuhiro Yanagida
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 6.  Bi-orienting chromosomes: acrobatics on the mitotic spindle.

Authors:  Tomoyuki U Tanaka
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2008-08-02       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  Condensin regulates the stiffness of vertebrate centromeres.

Authors:  Susana A Ribeiro; Jesse C Gatlin; Yimin Dong; Ajit Joglekar; Lisa Cameron; Damien F Hudson; Christine J Farr; Bruce F McEwen; Edward D Salmon; William C Earnshaw; Paola Vagnarelli
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 8.  Geometry and force behind kinetochore orientation: lessons from meiosis.

Authors:  Yoshinori Watanabe
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 9.  SUMO modification of DNA topoisomerase II: trying to get a CENse of it all.

Authors:  Ming-Ta Lee; Jeff Bachant
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2009-02-20

10.  Pericentromeric sister chromatid cohesion promotes kinetochore biorientation.

Authors:  Tessie M Ng; William G Waples; Brigitte D Lavoie; Sue Biggins
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 4.138

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.