Literature DB >> 28374259

Anorectal complications after robotic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.

Li-Jen Kuo1,2, James Chi-Yong Ngu3, Yan-Jiun Huang4,5, Yen-Kuang Lin6, Chia-Che Chen7, Yiu-Shun Tong7, Szu-Chia Huang8, Chia-Chen Hu4, Shu-Hwa Tan9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Robotic intersphincteric resection (ISR) has been introduced for sphincter-preservation in the treatment of low rectal cancer. However, many patients experience anorectal symptoms and defecatory dysfunction after ISR. This study aims to evaluate the anorectal complications that develop after ISR.
METHODS: The medical records of 108 patients who underwent robotic ISR at Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan between December 2011 and June 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Photographic records of perineal conditions were documented at the following time intervals after surgery: 1 day, 2 weeks, 1, 2, 3 and 6 months. Clinical outcomes and treatment results were analysed.
RESULTS: Eighty-five patients (78.7%) developed edematous hemorrhoids after surgery. These subsided at a median of 56 days after operation (range 23-89 days). Forty-six patients (42.6%) were found to have anal stenosis requiring anal dilatation. Sixteen patients (14.8%) had neorectal mucosal prolapse, which was noted to occur at an average of 98 days after surgery (range 41-162 days). Multivariate analysis showed that the occurrence of edematous hemorrhoids was associated with operating time (P = 0.043), and male gender was a significant risk factor for anal stenosis (P = 0.007).
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study reporting on the clinical outcomes of anorectal status after robotic ISR. Further studies are needed to assess the long-term effects of these anorectal complications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anal stenosis; Intersphincteric resection; Mucosal prolapse; Rectal cancer; Robotic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28374259     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5499-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  18 in total

1.  Prospective evaluation of anorectal function after total mesorectal excision for rectal carcinoma with or without preoperative radiotherapy.

Authors:  P van Duijvendijk; J F M Slors; C W Taat; W F van Tets; G van Tienhoven; H Obertop; G E E Boeckxstaens
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Increased burden of colorectal cancer in Asia.

Authors:  Mohamad Amin Pourhoseingholi
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2012-04-15

3.  Anastomotic leakage after lower gastrointestinal anastomosis: men are at a higher risk.

Authors:  Magdalena A Lipska; Ian P Bissett; Bryan R Parry; Arend E H Merrie
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.872

Review 4.  A review on functional results of sphincter-saving surgery for rectal cancer: the anterior resection syndrome.

Authors:  Filippo Pucciani
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2013-06-11

5.  Long-term clinical and functional results of intersphincteric resection for lower rectal cancer.

Authors:  Motoi Koyama; Akihiro Murata; Yoshiyuki Sakamoto; Hajime Morohashi; Seiji Takahashi; Eri Yoshida; Kenichi Hakamada
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Oncological and functional outcomes of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Li-Jen Kuo; Chin-Sheng Hung; Chien-Hua Wu; Web Wang; Ka-Wai Tam; Hung-Hua Liang; Yu-Jia Chang; Po-Li Wei
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 2.192

7.  Function after intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer and its influence on quality of life.

Authors:  G Barisic; V Markovic; M Popovic; I Dimitrijevic; P Gavrilovic; Z Krivokapic
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 3.788

8.  Persisting anorectal dysfunction after rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  A Maris; F Penninckx; A M Devreese; F Staes; P Moons; E Van Cutsem; K Haustermans; A D'Hoore
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.788

9.  Intersphincteric resection for low rectal tumours.

Authors:  R Schiessel; J Karner-Hanusch; F Herbst; B Teleky; M Wunderlich
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Reza Chamlou; Yann Parc; Tabassome Simon; Malika Bennis; Nidal Dehni; Rolland Parc; Emmanuel Tiret
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Robotic Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: Technical Controversies and a Systematic Review on the Perioperative, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes.

Authors:  Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi; Seon Hahn Kim
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2021-11-17

2.  Clinical outcome of the Gant-Miwa-Thiersch procedure for colonic mucosal prolapse after intersphincteric resection-a single-center report from Japan.

Authors:  Toshikatsu Nitta; Masatsugu Ishii; Jun Kataoka; Sedakatsu Senpuku; Yasuhiko Ueda; Ryo Iida; Ayumi Matsutani; Takashi Ishibashi
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-11-05

3.  Robotic surgery for colorectal disease: review of current port placement and future perspectives.

Authors:  Jong Lyul Lee; Hassan A Alsaleem; Jin Cheon Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 1.859

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.