Literature DB >> 18043056

Craniocervical motion during direct laryngoscopy and orotracheal intubation with the Macintosh and Miller blades: an in vivo cinefluoroscopic study.

Scott A LeGrand1, Bradley J Hindman, Franklin Dexter, Julie B Weeks, Michael M Todd.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have characterized segmental craniocervical motion that occurs during direct laryngoscopy and intubation with a Macintosh laryngoscope blade. Comparable studies with the Miller blade have not been performed. The aim of this study was to compare maximal segmental craniocervical motion occurring during direct laryngoscopy and orotracheal intubation with Macintosh and Miller blades.
METHODS: Eleven anesthetized and pharmacologically paralyzed patients underwent two sequential orotracheal intubations, one with a Macintosh blade and another with a Miller in random order. During each intubation, segmental craniocervical motion from the occiput to the fifth cervical vertebra (C5) was recorded using continuous lateral cinefluoroscopy. Single-frame images corresponding to the point of maximal cervical motion for both blade types were compared with a preintubation image. Using image analysis software, angular change in the sagittal plane at each of five intervertebral segments was compared between the Macintosh and Miller blades.
RESULTS: Extension at occiput-C1 was greater with the Macintosh blade compared with the Miller (12.1 degrees +/- 4.9 degrees vs. 9.5 degrees +/- 3.8 degrees, respectively; mean difference = 2.7 degrees +/- 3.0 degrees; P = 0.012). Total craniocervical extension (occiput-C5) was also greater with the Macintosh blade compared with the Miller (28.1 degrees +/- 9.5 degrees vs. 23.2 degrees +/- 8.4 degrees, respectively; mean difference = 4.8 degrees +/- 4.4 degrees; P = 0.008).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the Macintosh, the Miller blade was associated with a statistically significant, but quantitatively small, decrease in cervical extension. This difference is likely too small to be important in routine practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18043056     DOI: 10.1097/01.anes.0000291461.62404.46

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  7 in total

Review 1.  Prehospital use of cervical collars in trauma patients: a critical review.

Authors:  Terje Sundstrøm; Helge Asbjørnsen; Samer Habiba; Geir Arne Sunde; Knut Wester
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 5.269

2.  The pressure exerted on the tongue during intubation with simultaneous cervical spine immobilisation: a comparison between four videolaryngoscopes and the Macintosh laryngoscope-a manikin study.

Authors:  Dawid Aleksandrowicz; Tomasz Gaszyński
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Intubation Biomechanics: Laryngoscope Force and Cervical Spine Motion during Intubation in Cadavers-Cadavers versus Patients, the Effect of Repeated Intubations, and the Effect of Type II Odontoid Fracture on C1-C2 Motion.

Authors:  Bradley J Hindman; Robert P From; Ricardo B Fontes; Vincent C Traynelis; Michael M Todd; M Bridget Zimmerman; Christian M Puttlitz; Brandon G Santoni
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Intubation biomechanics: laryngoscope force and cervical spine motion during intubation with Macintosh and Airtraq laryngoscopes.

Authors:  Bradley J Hindman; Brandon G Santoni; Christian M Puttlitz; Robert P From; Michael M Todd
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Fluoroscopic Comparison of Cervical Spine Motion Using LMA CTrach, C-MAC Videolaryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope.

Authors:  Tülay Şahin; Zehra İpek Arslan; Gür Akansel; Onur Balaban; Derya Berk; Mine Solak; Kamil Toker
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2018-02-01

6.  Comparison of glottic visualisation and ease of intubation with different laryngoscope blades.

Authors:  Atul P Kulkarni; Amar S Tirmanwar
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2013-03

7.  Anesthetic considerations in acute spinal cord trauma.

Authors:  Neil Dooney; Armagan Dagal
Journal:  Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci       Date:  2011-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.