Literature DB >> 18042104

Should the quality of preparation impact postcolonoscopy follow-up recommendations?

John H Bond.   

Abstract

A high-quality bowel cleansing preparation is an essential prerequisite for a safe, efficient, and accurate colonoscopy. Large studies, however, have shown that up to 25% of patients undergoing colonoscopy have what is considered to be an inadequate preparation. A well-done survey reported in this issue of the American Journal of Gastroenterology by Ben-Horin et al. found considerable variability among endoscopists in their assessment of preparation adequacy from photographs of three representative cases. When the preparation was judged suboptimal, follow-up colonoscopy often was recommended at shorter time intervals than is currently indicated by clinical guidelines. Because this practice is not supported by any direct investigation, a better practice might be to determine if the preparation is poor or inadequate, indicating instead the need for a prompt repeat preparation and another colonoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18042104     DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01483.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  10 in total

Review 1.  Bowel preparations as quality indicators for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Jae Young Jang; Hoon Jai Chun
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Impact of Bowel Preparation Quality on Adenoma Identification During Colonoscopy and Optimal Timing of Surveillance.

Authors:  Ju Seok Kim; Sun Hyung Kang; Hee Seok Moon; Eaum Seok Lee; Seok Hyun Kim; Jae Kyu Sung; Byung Seok Lee; Hyun Yong Jeong; Woo Suk Chung
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Adherence to recommended intervals for surveillance colonoscopy in average-risk patients with 1 to 2 small (<1 cm) polyps on screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Stacy B Menees; Eric Elliott; Shail Govani; Constantinos Anastassiades; Philip Schoenfeld
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  The impact of suboptimal bowel preparation on adenoma miss rates and the factors associated with early repeat colonoscopy.

Authors:  Benjamin Lebwohl; Fay Kastrinos; Michael Glick; Adam J Rosenbaum; Timothy Wang; Alfred I Neugut
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Change in renal function after sodium phosphate preparation for screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Dong Choon Seol; Sung Noh Hong; Jeong Hwan Kim; In Kyung Sung; Hyung Seok Park; Jung Hyun Lee; Chan Sup Shim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Shortened surveillance intervals following suboptimal bowel preparation for colonoscopy: results of a national survey.

Authors:  Grace Clarke Hillyer; Corey H Basch; Benjamin Lebwohl; Charles E Basch; Fay Kastrinos; Beverly J Insel; Alfred I Neugut
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-08-12       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  The impact of bowel cleansing on follow-up recommendations in average-risk patients with a normal colonoscopy.

Authors:  Stacy B Menees; Eric Elliott; Shail Govani; Constantinos Anastassiades; Stephanie Judd; Annette Urganus; Suzanna Boyce; Philip Schoenfeld
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  The impact of fair colonoscopy preparation on colonoscopy use and adenoma miss rates in patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy.

Authors:  Stacy B Menees; H Myra Kim; Eric E Elliott; Jennifer L Mickevicius; Brittany B Graustein; Philip S Schoenfeld
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  The Effect of the Bowel Preparation Status on the Risk of Missing Polyp and Adenoma during Screening Colonoscopy: A Tandem Colonoscopic Study.

Authors:  Sung Noh Hong; In Kyung Sung; Jeong Hwan Kim; Won Hyeok Choe; Byung Kook Kim; Soon Young Ko; Jung Hyun Lee; Dong Choon Seol; Su Young Ahn; Sun-Young Lee; Hyung Seok Park; Chan Sup Shim
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2012-11-30

10.  Impact of Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation Quality on Follow-up Interval Recommendations for Average-risk Patients With Normal Screening Colonoscopies: Data From the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.

Authors:  Lynn F Butterly; Marion R Nadel; Joseph C Anderson; Christina M Robinson; Julia E Weiss; David Lieberman; Jean A Shapiro
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.174

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.