Literature DB >> 20419839

Change in renal function after sodium phosphate preparation for screening colonoscopy.

Dong Choon Seol1, Sung Noh Hong, Jeong Hwan Kim, In Kyung Sung, Hyung Seok Park, Jung Hyun Lee, Chan Sup Shim.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the changes in renal function at 12-24 mo in patients following sodium phosphate (NaP) preparation for screening colonoscopy.
METHODS: We carried out a retrospective study on the results from patients who received health check-up services as part of an employer-provided wellness program performed between August 2006 and May 2008 and who were followed up for 12-24 mo. Prior to screening colonoscopy, 224 patients underwent bowel cleansing with NaP (NaP group) and 113 patients with polyethylene glycol (PEG group). The control group comprised 672 age-matched patients. We compared the changes in the creatinine levels and the glomerular filtration rates (GFRs) from baseline to 12-24 mo between the NaP, PEG, and control groups using two-way repeated measured analysis of variance. In addition, multivariate linear regression analysis was performed to assess the risk factors for a decreased GFR.
RESULTS: The baseline mean serum creatinine level in the NaP, PEG, and control groups was 1.12 +/- 0.15, 1.12 +/- 0.16, and 1.12 +/- 0.15 mg/dL, which increased to 1.15 +/- 0.15, 1.15 +/- 0.18, and 1.15 +/- 0.15 mg/dL, respectively, after 12-24 mo. The baseline mean GFR in the NaP, PEG, and control groups was 69.0 +/- 7.7, 68.9 +/- 8.0, and 69.6 +/- 6.7 mL/min per 1.73 m(2), which decreased to 66.5 +/- 7.8, 66.5 +/- 8.3, and 67.4 +/- 6.4 mL/min per 1.73 m(2), respectively, after 12-24 mo. The changes in serum creatinine levels and GFRs were not significantly between the NaP, PEG, and control groups (P = 0.992 and P = 0.233, respectively). Using multivariate linear regression analysis, only the baseline GFR was associated with the change in GFR (P < 0.001). Indeed, the bowel preparations were not associated with the change in GFR (P = 0.297).
CONCLUSION: NaP bowel preparation in subjects with normal renal function was not associated with renal injury, and NaP can thus be used safely for screening colonoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20419839      PMCID: PMC2860079          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i16.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  28 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review: oral bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  J Belsey; O Epstein; D Heresbach
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 8.171

2.  Fatal hyperphosphatemia from a phosphosoda bowel preparation.

Authors:  Nadeem Ullah; Robert Yeh; Murray Ehrinpreis
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.062

3.  Measurement of serum electrolytes and phosphate after sodium phosphate colonoscopy bowel preparation: an evaluation.

Authors:  E J Ainley; P J Winwood; J P Begley
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Extreme hyperphosphatemia and acute renal failure after a phosphorus-containing bowel regimen.

Authors:  M Orias; R L Mahnensmith; M A Perazella
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.754

5.  Changes in renal function following administration of oral sodium phosphate or polyethylene glycol for colon cleansing before colonoscopy.

Authors:  Ramy Abaskharoun; William Depew; Stephen Vanner
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.522

6.  Projected national impact of colorectal cancer screening on clinical and economic outcomes and health services demand.

Authors:  Uri Ladabaum; Kenneth Song
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Sevelamer hydrochloride, a phosphate binder, protects against deterioration of renal function in rats with progressive chronic renal insufficiency.

Authors:  Nobuo Nagano; Sonoe Miyata; Sachiko Obana; Nami Kobayashi; Naoshi Fukushima; Steven K Burke; Michihito Wada
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.992

8.  Renal failure due to acute nephrocalcinosis following oral sodium phosphate bowel cleansing.

Authors:  Glen S Markowitz; Samih H Nasr; Philip Klein; Herman Anderson; Jay I Stack; Lloyd Alterman; Barbara Price; Jai Radhakrishnan; Vivette D D'Agati
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.466

9.  Risk of impaired renal function after colonoscopy: a cohort study in patients receiving either oral sodium phosphate or polyethylene glycol.

Authors:  Stefan Russmann; Lois Lamerato; Aditya Marfatia; Stephen P Motsko; John C Pezzullo; Gregory Olds; Judith K Jones
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Hyperphosphatemia: a factor that provokes severe experimental acute renal failure.

Authors:  R A Zager
Journal:  J Lab Clin Med       Date:  1982-08
View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  The safety of osmotically acting cathartics in colonic cleansing.

Authors:  Caroline Nyberg; Jakob Hendel; Ole H Nielsen
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 46.802

2.  A population-based case-crossover study of polyethylene glycol use and acute renal failure risk in the elderly.

Authors:  Nam-Kyong Choi; Yoosoo Chang; Sun-Young Jung; Yu-Kyong Choi; Joongyub Lee; Jin-Ho Lee; Ju-Young Kim; Byung-Joo Park
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Sodium phosphate does not increase risk for acute kidney injury after routine colonoscopy, compared with polyethylene glycol.

Authors:  J Bradley Layton; Philip J Klemmer; Christian F Christiansen; Andrew S Bomback; John A Baron; Robert S Sandler; Abhijit V Kshirsagar
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 11.382

4.  Efficacy and tolerability of split-dose PEG compared with split-dose aqueous sodium phosphate for outpatient colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Eun Hee Seo; Tae Oh Kim; Tae Gyoon Kim; Hee Rin Joo; Min Jae Park; Jongha Park; Seung Ha Park; Sung Yeon Yang; Young Soo Moon
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  The Effect of the Bowel Preparation Status on the Risk of Missing Polyp and Adenoma during Screening Colonoscopy: A Tandem Colonoscopic Study.

Authors:  Sung Noh Hong; In Kyung Sung; Jeong Hwan Kim; Won Hyeok Choe; Byung Kook Kim; Soon Young Ko; Jung Hyun Lee; Dong Choon Seol; Su Young Ahn; Sun-Young Lee; Hyung Seok Park; Chan Sup Shim
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2012-11-30

Review 6.  A comparative review of use of sulphate and phosphate salts for colonoscopy preparations and their potential for nephrotoxicity.

Authors:  Bruno Moulin; Thierry Ponchon
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2018-10-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.